Unbelievable dinner conversation

[Garak]

So how did OJ take a manly position? Must explain this to me, I must be dense.

Beats me, he was found not guilty of murder.

[Cordell Walker]

what the fuck does OJ have to do with anything in the first place
why bring him up at all

[devia]

So you don't know why he was brought into the conversation but you know it had nothing to do with his wife's murder? You'd think if you knew that you'd know why he was brought up. Kinda stands to reason.

[Bobx23456]

So you don't know why he was brought into the conversation but you know it had nothing to do with his wife's murder? You'd think if you knew that you'd know why he was brought up. Kinda stands to reason.

OJ stood his ground and ended up with custody of his children, unlike so many fahters who waste money on "family" courts and their evil scumbag lieyers.  He should be an example for men who's children are taken by the evil femiNazi Gestapo and their slave catchers. 

Blessings

Bob

[Garak]

So you don't know why he was brought into the conversation but you know it had nothing to do with his wife's murder? You'd think if you knew that you'd know why he was brought up. Kinda stands to reason.

Like I said, beats me, OJ was found not guilty.

[Cordell Walker]

So you don't know why he was brought into the conversation but you know it had nothing to do with his wife's murder? You'd think if you knew that you'd know why he was brought up. Kinda stands to reason.

all I'm saying devia is that  OJ shouldnt be  brought up in the first place, and yes I know who brought him up but my point is twofold
a)he was found not guilty of the murder despite probably having done it
b)the OJ case bears NO similarity to the one cited at the begingin of the thread

[Garak]

So you don't know why he was brought into the conversation but you know it had nothing to do with his wife's murder? You'd think if you knew that you'd know why he was brought up. Kinda stands to reason.

all I'm saying devia is that  OJ shouldnt be  brought up in the first place, and yes I know who brought him up but my point is twofold
a)he was found not guilty of the murder despite probably having done it
b)the OJ case bears NO similarity to the one cited at the begingin of the thread

This isn't about OJ but I have to say this: Why in the hell is a man still guilty when even the man hating courts proved him innocent???

[Cordell Walker]

I dint say he was guilty.............I said that I think he probably did it, he got a just verdict though......the courts fucked that case so bad I had reasonable doubt

[devia]

I agree Tony... not sure what he has to do with anything, the only thing he's notorious for is being the guy who seems to have gotten away with killing his ex. Best to get back on topic.

P.S Lots of men are found guilty that are innocent... sometimes it happens the other way around.

[Galt]

Why in the hell is a man still guilty when even the man hating courts proved him innocent???

Because he did it. No matter what the idiotic jury decided.

[Garak]

Why in the hell is a man still guilty when even the man hating courts proved him innocent???

Because he did it. No matter what the idiotic jury decided.

Yeah, kinda like the Duke Lacrosse case where half the public still thinks they did it.

[Cordell Walker]

good comeback Garak
but ANYWAYS i wuld be willing to et this aint what the original thread is about

the origianl thread is about the journalistic bias toward mothers/women in news realeases

[Cordell Walker]

and btw bob, if you wanted to prove a point why not point to  someone who used deadly force standing their ground in a kidnapping/support/custody battle
bad OJ analogy.........think deeper
using OJ seems to me to be
a)either ill thought out
b)a shock tactic

[Garak]

and btw bob, if you wanted to prove a point why not point to  someone who used deadly force standing their ground in a kidnapping/support/custody battle
bad OJ analogy.........think deeper
using OJ seems to me to be
a)either ill thought out
b)a shock tactic

It worked as a shock tactic, got Devia, Tony and you worked up about it.

[Cordell Walker]

first of all.........I AM TONY
second of all, I wasnt worked up, if he was going to make the point of a man standing his grounds in the face of unfair treatment by the courts there is darren mack that black guy in ATL etc et all
and btw bob if youre so god damn enthusiastic about killin and revolution, why you aint out on th ewarpath