I can see why they are upset. I have no issue with a blog calling out American women on their behavior-it is boorish and unfair and these women should understand that when they behave in these ways it turns men off. I am an american woman and I am embarrassed by what passes as normal behavior and ideas. The attempt to give women carte blanche to ruin a man's life by crying rape for consenual sex, by bypassing the rights of the accused, and by turning a blind eye to women's criminal behavior are all dangerous problems to everyone in society, especially men. I completely agree with the boycott and would not blame any man for steering clear of American women for these reasons.
The issue I have is the use of derogatory terms like sluts and whores and telling them to become lesbians or cat hoarders, none of which describe the behavior to which this blogger is refering. He is basically taking a really good point and dressing it up with lumps of turds....no one will see his points because all they see is the shit.
I really wish people would take 5 minutes to think about what they write before they push 'enter'.
You're going the diplomatic route, the Glen Sacks way. Its been tried, some will keep trying and they may win with that route, but only if the "extremists" wake folks up at this point. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, as radical feminists have often proven. Some average women and manginas need to see how angry many men are, how biased the system is. Men will be demonized whether they try the reasonable route or "get in your face" or rather promote a boycott. A boycott that will never ever be fully effective, except for the men with the most potential (the ones women want to mate/grab on to) jumping ship (already happening and more noticable every day). I'm told my anger will go away if I clean myself up and get out there. Well sure, in many ways thats true. That doesn't change the fact that I'll still be a second class citizen and still have even single mothers who expect or demand that I worship them just for being women, oh and finance their kids and lifestyles. I should feel damn lucky they want me at all. Oh, and pick up the tab for all the party girls through social welfare taxes too while you're at it. Theres a good boy! Who wants a clam flavored biscuit!
Over the past couple of years, having thought about it a lot, the very passage of IMBRA says diplomacy, compromise, talking things out isn't going to work on its own. That Valenti's argument for repeal of the long legal tradition of "innocent until proven guilty" for sex crimes/rape gets posted in a NATIONAL newspaper tells me there is little room or point to debate in a "calm reasonable manner". They (feminists) won't listen. They'll turn up the Shrill Harridan Harpy Amp to 11.