Stand Your Ground

Stand Your Ground Forums => Main => Topic started by: The Biscuit Queen on Dec 28, 2010, 05:50 AM

Title: Early feminists were pro-life
Post by: The Biscuit Queen on Dec 28, 2010, 05:50 AM
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/letters-to-the-editor/2010/12/27/like-sarah-palin-early-feminists-were-pro-life (http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/letters-to-the-editor/2010/12/27/like-sarah-palin-early-feminists-were-pro-life)

I gotta hand it to Palin, she is really rocking the boat. This is an excellent article. There was one quote that said it all:

Quote
Elizabeth Cady Stanton lamented in a personal letter, "When we consider that women are treated as property, it is degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be disposed of as we see fit." [Letter to Julia Ward Howe, October 16, 1873]


Two points: Of course it is also degrading to children that we treat them as property. And even as she keeps a pro-life stance she plays the double victim. Women are victims when treated as property, AND when they treat others as property. Logic would dictate that women are the oppressors of children, not their victims. This could be explained by the idea the feminists had that if women were not oppressed they would never need an abortion. Unfortunately this proved the opposite.
Title: Re: Early feminists were pro-life
Post by: Men's Rights Activist on Dec 28, 2010, 06:19 AM
Yea, that's another inconvenient, gender feminist truth.  They brush over that in women's studies for the good of their Marx-o-centric agenda.
Title: Re: Early feminists were pro-life
Post by: poiuyt on Dec 28, 2010, 02:40 PM
Today, baby boys, baby girls, but most especially infant sons, if not aborted prior to delivery or aborted afterwards, are abandoned to fatherlessness, isolation, orphanry and bastardy, not because of the activities of women or feminists of an earlier age, but because of the genocidal culture adopted and manically enfored through institutions by dead and dying chauvenist males of this rotten land !!!

The women of this genderist shithole of a society are no different to the women of the rest of the world in their demands from their menfolk for more, more and more in return for less or nothing. But contrary to their womenfolk, it is the menfolk of this place that are different to others of the world, for readily caving into and capitulating to every single demand of females and genderists. Furthermore they use womens demands as an enduring excuse, pretext and justification for the most barbaric and most nasty of things they wish to do to disposess and violate others for no reason at all.

But to add insult to injury, these malicious animals answering to being men in these shithole lands, went a few shameless steps further than mere treachery to themselves, their own kind and their own sons. They even audaciously but falsely suggested to their womenfolk, other mens womenfolk, and continue to suggest to even women whom never themselves asked for it, the kinds of demands, rights, privilages, entitlements and protections they were owed by their menfolk. Because that then gives these dead and dying chauvenist men in their twisted, foaming minds, the continuing excuse and authority they need for ongoing unjust actions.

Thus, are these men in public authority and office or those ones giving legitimacey and service to such a barbaric and one sided genderist system, not themselves lower than animals, lower than vermin, lower than bedbugs, disease and sickness, than are their womenfolk whom merely abort, kill or wound their unborn on permission from these malicious men ? They are !

Why should they continue to exist unobtruded, freely spreading their evil, their ideological contamination and their genderist bigotry everywhere amongst honest men, women and children ... whom would be much more healthier, more free and much more happier without them ?