Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Masterpiece

1
Main / File Release: Goodbye Daddy
Nov 18, 2004, 05:30 AM
Quote from: "daksdaddy"
Would it it possible to get a "DAT" or BETA copy of this show.
Our local Cable Co Has 2 channels for "local Broadcast", I am a contractor for the Company.


Unfortunately this file was made by capturing a VHS and I overdubbed the english subtitles, allowing it to be shared on any filesharing program without looking up subtitles too. A BETA or DAT is quite impossible for me to get my hands on. The best I can provide is an MPEG1 without subtitles. But you can, however, get one from the TV station who made it.

Address:

Spelling in english:
DR-Dokumentar, DR 1, Danmarks Radio
TV-Byen Moerkhoejvej 500.
2860 Soeborg, Denmark
Phone. + 45 35 20 30 40

Spelling in Danish:
DR-Dokumentar, DR 1, Danmarks Radio
TV-Byen Mørkhøjvej 500.
2860 Søborg, Danmark
Phone. + 45 35 20 30 40

The documentary's name in english:
Goodbye Daddy (of course)

The documentary's name in danish:
Farvel Far

Is it any good?

By the way; despite my english the translation is pretty good. Close to perfect. LSBeene cleaned it up several times while we wrote the subtitles. I'm working on one more translation for a follow-up on this documentary, this time, exposing officials who deliberately advocated false accusations to create some jobs for themselves (I live in a feminist/communist country...go figure). I've just been pretty busy lately but I will make it a high priority if this project did any good for you guys in here.
2
Main / File Release: Goodbye Daddy
Nov 17, 2004, 05:54 AM
Update:

Anyone in here still want this file?

You can get it with Bit Torrent here:

http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrents/view_36834
3
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 10:10 AM
Quote from: "mr niceguy"
When in doubt, look it up on snopes: http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

Here's your fireball: http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/03/07/gen.pentagon.pictures/

Gotta go, but I'll return for more of this entertainment later today.


I can see the fireball. As Eric Huffschmid has demonstrated, this fireball is bright and white, consistent with explosives - whereas a fireball from jet fuel is much more likely to be dark and filled with sod because of the poor mix with oxygen. Furthermore, it's very revealing, that we never get to see the timestamps when the pictures from the security cameras at the Pentagon are printed in newspapers. The timestamp clearly says: "Sep. 12, 2001". Why?

This (official) explanation http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm doesn't really hold any water as I see it. There are to many "likely" and "probably" in it. And the answers seem outright unbelievable to me, when I take all other evidences into consideration.


Besides, this presentation reveals, that plaincrashes mess up the ground:

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon121.swf

So either these pilots were very skilled pilots, capable of flying extremely low without hitting the ground - or the military was smoking pot that day, when they allowed these planes to fly around for an hour without any scrambled jegfighters interferring, therefore allowing the pilots to really get time to do a "test-run" before they finally got it right - and hit the Pentagon.

Masterpiece
4
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 09:14 AM
Quote from: "mr niceguy"
Where there's smoke, there's fire.

Here's an eyewitness account from someone who saw the plane crash: http://www.naualumni.com/News/News.cfm?ID=613&c=4. Or is she a part of the conspiracy too?

I too was surprised when I saw the two planes crash into the WTC. I would have thought that planes would drop to the ground after crashing into buildings. Maybe that is true for small, light planes. But as we all saw, when a large Boeing slams into a building, it buries itself into the building, explodes, and disintegrates.

I'm glad I could clear this up for you guys.


Eyewitnesses can be bought. Especially when other eyewitnesses say they saw a missile. That turn the "eyewitness" arguements into a draw. We can now concentrate on finding the Boeing, that nobody seems to be able to find in the Pentagon, and the OBVIUOS lack of damage to a puny book and a litlle fragile monitor, that OUGHT to either be blown to 10.000 pieces or disintegrate in a wild fire feeded by 8600 gallons of fuel.

When we are done with that, we can move on to questions about the mounted missilepod under the first plane that hit WTC.

I repeat; where can I buy such a monitor? http://www.geocities.com/reverent_wise/911_in_plane_Site.html?1095608542031

Masterpiece
5
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 08:44 AM
Quote from: "Dr Evil"
I think it is a valid question to ask where the debris from the plane might be.  For something that large it simply doesn't disintegrate and vaporize.  We have all seen coverage of numerous plane crashes over the years and I have yet to see one where there is not a shred of evidence like a piece of the tail or fuselage or something.  Even when planes go down into water and sink there is still debris floating on the surface.  It seems very very suspicious that there was no debris to be seen.


Right Dr. Evil!

I just put up two more pictures. Both from the security camera at the Pentagon. I find two serious flaws; 1. Where is the Boeing? Are we supposed to believe, that the smoke at the right side of the picture represents exhaust from a boeing that isn't there? 2. Why is the time stamp altered to September 12th?

http://www.geocities.com/reverent_wise/911_in_plane_Site.html?1095608542031

Masterpiece
6
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 08:24 AM
Quote from: "mr niceguy"
Quote from: "Masterpiece"
Are you honestly going to tell me, that these damages are consitent with the results of a plane loaded with 8600 gallons of fuel crashing into the Pentagon?

Apparently -- yes.

Quote
How can a book lie around undamaged then? Or how can the computer monitor look like new? And where is the plane for that matter? Well it COULD have been removed but that doesn't quite answer the lack of damages from a HUGE fire?

So now you are denying that there was a huge fire? WE ALL SAW THE HUGE FIRE BURNING, ON TV!


What I saw on TV was a lot of smoke. But I didn't actually see any fire. So what is the computer monitor and the book made of? Titanium? One thing is certain; I want to get in contact with the manufacture of these books and screens - because they should TRUELY be able to withstand the test of time - and planecrashes.
7
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 08:17 AM
Mr. Niceguy:

Take a look at these pictures.

http://www.geocities.com/reverent_wise/911_in_plane_Site.html?1095606821593

Are you honestly going to tell me, that these damages are consitent with the results of a plane loaded with 8600 gallons of fuel crashing into the Pentagon?

How can a book lie around undamaged then? Or how can the computer monitor look like new? And where is the plane for that matter? Well it COULD have been removed but that doesn't quite answer the lack of damages from a HUGE fire?
8
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 07:51 AM
Quote from: "mr niceguy"
Quote from: "Masterpiece"
I have just watched this documentary; "911 in plane site".

http://www.policestate21.com/

This is probably nr. 20 I've watched or something to that extend - and this one ALSO has footage of the attacks on both the Pentagon and WTC in best possible quality from both handheld and broadcast cameras. I will cut frames out of it and post them on a homepage of my own, to prove my case, by myself, if necessary.

This documentary CLEARLY confirms both these homepages claims:

http://letsroll911.org/



http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

You've (all of us really) been dubed America. By whom I don't know - but we've been suckered!


Masterpiece:

You need to stop believing everything you see and read. Surely you are not this gullible?

These 9/11 fantasies were already debunked earlier in this thread while you were sleeping.

I repeat my question: Where are the people who were aboard the plane that we were all told crashed into the Pentagon?

--Bob


And you need to stop talking about things you don't really know anything about - even bother to examine. And those 911 fantasies were not debunkered, because the "probably-theory" is not de-bunking. It's just a communist trick.  

I don't know were that plain is. It could be sitting at the bottom of the sea for all I care. BUT...it did NOT hit the Pentagon because I have VERY good pictures of the hole in the Pentagon. They're so good, that I can SEE an open book on a chair (not the slightest burned) and a computer screen which is NOT broke - at ALL! So now I will cut some frames and begin to ask YOU some questions. I look very much forward to see, how possible denial is.

Masterpiece
9
Main / Free Energy - a goal for MRA's
Sep 19, 2004, 06:25 AM
Quote from: "Mr Benn"
Hey guys, stop jumping all over Masterpiece.

Maybe this device for tapping into the claimed zero-point energy field is valid. And maybe it isn't. But theres a bigger picture here that Masterpiece was, I beleive, trying to get at.

And that is that it is worth considering the sociological implications of promoting non-traditional energy sources.

Think of the power that terrorists derive from their potential ability to disrupt the oil supply. Think of the potential danger of a terrorist attack on a nuclear power plant.


Than you Mr. Benn. That was exactly my point. I just watched "The race to Zero point" but I'm unfortunately not very mathematical - therefore I can't really seperate real from wrong information in this field. But everything looks perfectly legitimit to me. This documentary has lot's of explanations to why Einsteins relativity theory doesn't apply here - but as I said- I have no way of really knowing.

Masterpiece
10
Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 19, 2004, 06:17 AM
I have just watched this documentary; "911 in plane site".

http://www.policestate21.com/

This is probably nr. 20 I've watched or something to that extend - and this one ALSO has footage of the attacks on both the Pentagon and WTC in best possible quality from both handheld and broadcast cameras. I will cut frames out of it and post them on a homepage of my own, to prove my case, by myself, if necessary.

This documentary CLEARLY confirms both these homepages claims:

http://letsroll911.org/

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

You've (all of us really) been dubed America. By whom I don't know - but we've been suckered!
11
Main / Free Energy - a goal for MRA's
Sep 16, 2004, 06:04 AM
Well, I guess it would be a simple thing to check out for real  then, instead of just debating sceptisism. Actually, I have a 60 minute documentary about zero point energy. I haven't seen it yet but I will do that now. And the guy from beefreetech happens to participate in it.

Masterpiece
12
Main / Free Energy - a goal for MRA's
Sep 16, 2004, 03:30 AM
Hi guys.

Look, we need some kind of goal for the Mens movemement. I think we should stop bitching and work towards a common goal. And I suggest we make free energy something for MRA's to strive for. Besides beeing free energy it would also undermine the current power structures. What do you say?

http://www.befreetech.com/media.htm

I haven't actually seen these apparatus. But they look very very promising. And the opportunities it would provide us are endless.

Masterpiece
13
Main / Re: Men being the problem
Sep 16, 2004, 03:24 AM
Quote from: "Captain Stubing"
MrNiceGuy, I am starting to think that maybe I can teach you more than you can teach me. Any man who spends time with lots of women know of the basic contradictions there are. Women do love to be put on pedestals. When you ignore them, they respond very favorably because their self-esteem takes a hit. So there is no paradox and nothing flawed in my logic and statements, even though you try hard to insult me whenever you can. I said that a) women love to be put on pedestals and I also said b) that if you don't put them on a pedestal they will respond favorably. The contradiction is not within me but within the particular women I refer to, which is the majority. That is why they claim to want love and nice guys but dump you for the hippie who rebels against society. That is surely a contradiction. So, let's break it down for you, Mr.NiceGuy. Anytime I go too fast for you, let me know. Women do want you to put them on a pedestal. They want things their way and they want lots of attention. However, they also like challenges more than they like the pedestal treatment. So, when you don't put them on a pedestal they go crazy wanting you, wanting you to put them back on the pedestal. If you still don't understand, ask yourself because I am now somewhat sure you are a woman masquerading as a man on this site, or a girly-man.


I totally aggree. I don't give a shit about women or their affection and I actually tend to ignore them. It was not always so. But after I found out, that they really don't give a shit about anything but thermselves, naturally, I simply gave up on them and began to look in other directions for some usefullness - an found it. Ironicly, when i DID give a shit about women I got screwed. Now, theyr'e more like perthetic little lap-dogs around me because I couldn't care less about them. The only problem I have with women is, that they want to enslave me and my gender when they don't get the expected attention. I wish they would just take their rubber dicks and fuc* off and do it with themselves AND stop using my taxmoney.

Masterpiece
14
Quote from: "angryharry"
Masterpiece

Quote
Good point AH. But also a point that makes me incredibly fuc**** tired just thinking about - because it seems impossible to resolve. Is this where jiggering the gender ratio becomes a solution?


LOL!

Not yet!

First, we need to grow the organism of the Men's Movement and do as much as we can to ensure that the spread of information continues.

Eventually, the minds of men-who-sit-at-screens will dominate the planet.

Let me put this another way.

If there were 10 million men floating aroung forums such as this, the war against feminism would very quickly be over.

The rest is just a question of filling in the details.

And if we do not grow the men's movement quickly enough, I reckon that we are all pretty much doomed.

Viruses!

And as more and more people begin to realise this, both men and women will rush to support us.

Imagine, for example, if F4J had access to viruses!

Imagine if LST8000 had access to viruses!!!!!!!

LOL!

There is no happy future for any of us without the support of 'men'.

Harry



Harry...you are a damn genius. I think you're right on the money. I got to get some sleep now - it's 01:00 AM over here. And your forementioned point made me really tired - but the last one made me want to dream some sweet dreams regardless how odd it may seem.

Masterpiece
15
Quote from: "angryharry"
Feminism
Quote
It's nothing but a Rockerfeller creation


No. Feminism is much more than that.

For example, let me quote from one of my pieces ...

............

The Beatles pop group took the world by storm in the early 1960s. They produced a kind of music that many people wanted to hear. And their 'enterprise' - their music - would have had no influence at all if people had not responded so positively toward it.

The Beatles - the 'leaders' - did not 'inflict' their music upon a reluctant world and force their musical enterprise into becoming the global phenomenon that it turned out to be. Their enterprise mushroomed because a positive feedback loop was generated.

This involved ordinary people responding to their music in such a way (buying their records, attending their concerts etc) that the Beatles themselves were further empowered with the wherewithal to create even more music, and to spread it around even further.

The point is that their music - their enterprise - did not invade the western world so pervasively simply because of the activities of the Beatles themselves. The activities of millions of others gave rise to the prominence of their music.

Without these millions of others, hardly anyone would ever have heard of the Beatles or their music.

And, clearly, the same can be said with regard to big ideologies and big movements.

For example, there is no way that somebody like Hitler - on his own - could have forced millions of Germans to do what they did in the 1930s. The huge influence that he and his cronies exerted stemmed not only from their own actions but from the feedback mechanisms in which millions of others took part.

For example, German women positively adored Hitler. They can be seen in the mass rallies behaving in exactly the same manner toward him as did young western girls who attended Beatles' concerts.

They screamed. They cried. They called out his name. They begged to touch him. And so when Hitler and his cronies - and, indeed, everybody else - saw this unbridled adulation being inspired by him, both he and his ideology spread like wildfire.

And, unsurprisingly, millions of German men wanted to be like him!

Indeed, if women had not found Hitler to be so deliciously attractive then his influence upon men would have been curtailed quite considerably - if not completely.

...............

Organisms!

LOL!

Harry



Good point AH. But also a point that makes me incredibly fuc**** tired just thinking about - because it seems impossible to resolve. Is this where jiggering the gender ratio becomes a solution?

Masterpiece