Messages

1

Main / My Super Ex-Girlfriend

Jul 27, 2006, 08:42 AM

I'm asking you for evidence to back up your claim.  You simply keep making the same claim of victimhood repeatedly.  Not gonna work.  Accountability is a tough one.  Give proof or apologize.

Sorry, Dr. E, I'm all burned out on the game of laborously searching through literally hundreds, if not thousands of posts, snipping a byte or two from each, reposting them in one location, and dissecting each one.  I have already done this based upon various whims of yours, on pain of losing board privileges, multiple times in the past.  I do really like this board, but not enough to do this yet again.  To be honest, while this is an easy example of the way you single me out for harrassment, if you did actually practice this requirement fairly and equally across the board, I still wouldn't do it and I imagine you'd soon have an echoingly empty board.  Seriously, dude...anyway, to recap:  you harrass me personally as you harrass no one else, you are doing it again now, of course I can't stop you, but I'm not going to help you do it anymore either.  If you feel you must ban me, so be it.  If not, let's move on.

2

Main / My Super Ex-Girlfriend

Jul 27, 2006, 08:01 AM

No we are not moving on.

First thing you need to do is answer my question.  If you won't answer it I will suspend your account until you do.  Back up your claim that you are the victim of an endless stream of insults here or apologize.

I have been the target of your personal harrassment, Dr. E., something that is hardly a secret on this board.  But unlike the Real World, of course, this board *is* your own personal reality and you can actually reshape it to your own desires rather than being forcibly stuck with what really occurred.  You do what you feel you must.  I'll miss it here, as always, if what you feel you must do is ban me.

3

Main / The Sour Fruit of Modern Gender Ideology

Jul 27, 2006, 07:28 AM

So there's no middle ground between this woman's complete disdain for her children and worshiping them?   She couldn't tell us enough how boring it was to spend even a moment talking to them, or doing *anything* with them at all.   But the only other alternative is to put them on a pedestal and be a martyr?   It has to go over-the-top in either direction?

That's the most important point.  There is a middle ground and it's (IMO only of course) the perfect place to be.  I find both extremes icky and child-damaging.

4

Main / My Super Ex-Girlfriend

Jul 27, 2006, 06:53 AM

Well Lisa. Last time I remember seeing you I had asked you a question and then you dissappeared.  Here's the question:
   

Lisa said: Quote:
Sort of like the endless stream of insults aimed at me, one of which is typified above, that is never recognized or staunched. A pattern here for some time. Rolling Eyes


Dr Evil said: Now how about backing that up and posting the endless stream of insults. Let's see them. Otherwise this is just one more exagerated false accusation.

Maybe you can back up that claim that you have been the victim of an endless stream of insults.  Yes? .

No need, Dr. E, it's been well recognized in the past that you personally, regularly, go after me personally on this board.

Or maybe you can just admit that you exagerated and falsely accused this board of "victimizing" you.

Indeed I never accused the "board" of anything, I love the board!  I simply pointed out *your* totally blatant campaign of harrassment against me personally.  Not that it needed pointing out.   :wink:

As a moderator I find it tiresome that you disappear when confrtonted and then wait several months to return as if the slate is clear.  It is not.  It's time you answered the above question.

All answered!  Let's move on, shall we?  Or you can ban me from the board, your choice.  If I get banned, I would like to say Goodbye and Thanks For Your Time, It Was Very Appreciated to everybody else now!

5

Main / My Super Ex-Girlfriend

Jul 27, 2006, 05:43 AM

lkanneg,

reposting this for you since it is a fit reply for what you said as well as what Devia said.

Looks like another movie sterotyping woman as being crazy.

To some extent yes. But more than that it is portraying a woman being abusive to a man as being funny. And what people here are saying is if you reverse the roles the movie is condemned for glorifiying stalking and abuse. I may see this movie just to see how bad it is. I may evenchuckle at a few parts, but that won't change my view of it overall as playing to the blatant double standards in societal behavior towards men.

Reposting my earlier response, since it's a fit reply for this repost:

Aggh, all I see is that it is one huge insult to both women AND men. blech.

6

Main / Mail Order Husbands (well, sort of)

Jul 27, 2006, 05:40 AM

You are the chase-e here, and still the chase-e there.
For men we have to be the chase-e here, but not there.

kapeash?  

You have a significant point there...however, that would only explain it if I felt the same level of interest both here and abroad...I felt less interest abroad...

When I was in the Navy in 1980, I was stationed in Scotland. The woman there didn't play hard to get if they liked you, they would walk right up to you and ask you to dance, buy you a drink, ect. They weren't afraid of you or treat you as though you were trying to get something from them that they didn't want also.
Here we have to prove ourselves first, there we don't.......I think western woman like the chase........perhaps this would explain 'your interest'?

No, because I was chased far more aggressively over there than I am here...if the chase was my main thing, I'd have been more interested there, but I am more interested here.  Good thought though...

7

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 27, 2006, 05:36 AM

7 times more then me.

Wow. Do you get a prize?

Is somebody giving them out, and would I get it for a lack of discrimination or an overabundance of self-control?   :wink:

8

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 27, 2006, 05:35 AM

Let's see...  hmmmm......   I guess X= the number of sex partners you've had.... Oh, wait, that's the number of MEN you've had sex with.....  My bad...    OK...)

For me personally, # sex partners = # male sex partners, so no need to account for that here...

86/100 (X)  +  1 =   X

Looks to me like X = just over 7

You go girl....

I'm certainly no statistician, but if somebody pulled out, that might allow for an error margin of plus/minus 5 bp.    I'm sure you're within that range here.    

Nah, no error margin.   :wink: my definition of "having sex" is pretty inclusive.

9

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 27, 2006, 05:29 AM

7 times more then me.

Wow. Do you get a prize?

Ummmm, you got married.  She has been with 7 men, so you mean **6** more than you have?  Right?

Steven

Nah, she took the multiplication route of getting from 1 to 7, ie 1 x 7 = 7.

10

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 27, 2006, 05:27 AM

Am I the only sports nut who saw "86%" and instantly knew what the fraction was?  (We baseball fans see numbers like .167, .429, .857 all the time and the fractions 1/6, 3/7, 6/7 become second nature.)

See, I didn't know that...you learn something new every day...

11

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 26, 2006, 07:44 PM

86% ikanneg?   Wow, that's some precise data.   Impressive.

72.4 % of men I've slept with farted in bed.   12.3 % on their left side, 32.6 % on their right side, and the rest answered, "I farted?"

Let's not go into the percentage of time I've farted in bed...     :roll:

Aw, c'mon.  It's just a rounded decimal conversion from the precise fraction.  Hey, for all you arithmetic whizzes and story problem lovers out there, here's your big chance to figure out how many men I've had sex with...wheee, bet there's a lot of excitement out there about THAT  :roll: ...so if 86% of the men I've had sex with asked me what I thought of their penis sizes AND only 1 of the men I've had sex with has NOT asked me what I thought of his penis size...how many men have I had sex with total?

A train is leaving Chicago headed westbound at 35 miles per hour.....

You know that's almost exactly what I was thinking when I wrote that.   :lol:

12

Main / Mail Order Husbands (well, sort of)

Jul 26, 2006, 07:26 PM

Nice to see you back! I think part is not just the chasee part but also in both places, men were wanting to please YOU instead of how men experience it where men in western nations tend to go from having to chase and plase her to being chased and her being interested in pleasing him as well instead of her being the required center of attention.

Nice to see you too!

13

Main / Re: xx

Jul 26, 2006, 07:25 PM

I submit that if a woman could have a penis for a day, and use it properly, she'd fight to the death to keep it.

Are you nuts?!  Not to knock the penis, I'm sure having one is great.  But it's very, very nice having a clitoris and a vagina, too.  Sex-wise.  As far as having a vagina in regards to actual human reproduction, okay, that's a little less awesome.

As much abuse as being male entails these days, few of us would switch genders.

Now, that IS interesting.  If being a woman is so awesome in our society, as many claim, why don't more men want to become one?

Living in a place where "getting laid" is no more difficult or expensive than ordering pizza makes for an astonishing sense of freedom and empowerment.   It allows me think about my job, my friends,  my sports teams and all the other things that make up my life without being distracted by the "urge."

Yep, I hear you.

Another thing.  Being in SE Asia allowed me to understand the discomfort women experience when being sexually harassed.

Really?  That's a very intriguing thing to say.  Can you elaborate?  I've never heard a man say that before.

14

Main / Cover up, Gentlemen

Jul 26, 2006, 05:36 PM

Having recently returned from among other things, a nude beach, I gotta say, I think clothing should always be optional except when it poses a health hazard (like places with food contact surfaces or hospitals or subzero temperatures).  Yep, most people are kinda nasty naked (at least most people at nude beaches).  However, it is not the responsibility of other people to be forced to either look hot or hide themselves from view so we can all enjoy our visual experiences when we look around.  And from the feminist perspective, everybody being naked would totally get rid of all that "dressing provocatively is a legitimate argument against the victim of rape" crap.   Yep, I vote "clothing-optional" everywhere.

15

Main / NYC Billboard - A Woman Scorned

Jul 26, 2006, 05:29 PM

"Even a whale feels small in the ocean."

Woman:  "My, you have a small organ."

Man:  "I didn't know I was going to be playing in a cathedral!"

Try the roast beef... I'll be here all week!

Baboom

:heartbeat: no2fembots  :lol: