This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The consequences are that you get a warning. I was going to let it slide but since you are unable to take a shred of responsibility I will enforce the rule as it stands. That was a negative globalization about women and breaks the rules here. That's a warning.Are you calling me a misogynist?
This thread has been useful to note that we do indeed have misogynists amongst us. Sad but true.
Yes.
That's a personal attack! I hope you have a warning lined up for yourself.
You said that women could not be trusted as leaders or mothers due to a tiny fraction of them being abusive to their children. This is the same as when feminists try to shame and blame all men due to the 1% that are violent offenders. It is misandry when they do it and it is misogyny when you do it. Don't like it? Prove me wrong.
Uh no, I said the stats said that. I never gave a personal opinion.
You personally attacked me and I want to know what the consequence is for that?
Are you calling me a misogynist?
This thread has been useful to note that we do indeed have misogynists amongst us. Sad but true.
Yes.
That's a personal attack! I hope you have a warning lined up for yourself.
You said that women could not be trusted as leaders or mothers due to a tiny fraction of them being abusive to their children. This is the same as when feminists try to shame and blame all men due to the 1% that are violent offenders. It is misandry when they do it and it is misogyny when you do it. Don't like it? Prove me wrong.
your pissing with the wind blowing the wrong direction
he didnt threaten to ban you for being a mysiginist in his eyes so why are you pressing the issue
and why does his personal opinion matter to you?
he pays the bills though
Are you calling me a misogynist?
This thread has been useful to note that we do indeed have misogynists amongst us. Sad but true.
Yes.
something like this kinda quiz BRIAN
1. name two rights garunteed in the first ten amendments?
2.what are the three branches of federal goverment
3. what has to happen for congress to ovverride a presidedntial veto?
4. how many supreme court justices are there
5.what are the two houses of congress and how many members do they have?
..and does any of this help a person determine who would the best President?
Yes. It means they have half a brain and that they have at least been paying a modicum of attention.
Are you calling me a misogynist?
This thread has been useful to note that we do indeed have misogynists amongst us. Sad but true.
something like this kinda quiz BRIAN
1. name two rights garunteed in the first ten amendments?
2.what are the three branches of federal goverment
3. what has to happen for congress to ovverride a presidedntial veto?
4. how many supreme court justices are there
5.what are the two houses of congress and how many members do they have?
Women are not useless.
If they have no use as mothers or as citizens, then what is their use?
This is my issue.
If women can't be trusted as leaders, then how can they be trusted as mothers?
The stats say that they can't.
The logical conclusion to a group of individuals who are useless is extermination.
This is my issue.
If women can't be trusted as leaders, then how can they be trusted as mothers?
The stats say that they can't.
What stats are those?
The ones that report that women abuse children more than men.
I have my doubts about that stat. I believe the statistic that more abuse of children is perpetrated by women than men. I also suspect that more diamonds are stolen out of mine shafts by employee theft by men than women. The crimes are occupation-specific. A meaningful statistic would be number of offenders per 1000 population, by gender.
This is my issue.
If women can't be trusted as leaders, then how can they be trusted as mothers?
The stats say that they can't.
What stats are those?
The ones that report that women abuse children more than men.
If you are going to go down that road then you also have to say that men can't be trusted either since they committ the majority of murders and assaults. This is very flimsy thinking and it is exactly that our opponents have been utilizing now for over thirty years: trying to frame all men due to the acts of a tiny fraction. Please don't try the same thing, saying it is flimsy is being overly nice. Trying to tar all women due to the tiny percentage that abuse their kids is misogyny just as blaming all men due to some men's violence is misandry.
I'm not going to even touch the "blame women for everything" excuse. You guys feel free but that makes me no better than feminists. Women shoukd vote. They are moral beings same as blacks and any other human. I just don't agree everything went to pot when women voted. It was probably going that way anyway.
This is my issue.
If women can't be trusted as leaders, then how can they be trusted as mothers?
The stats say that they can't.
What stats are those?