This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
So I've heard a few professors in my educational career stand in front of the class and mention prehistorical matriarchies. Most of them spend less than 30 seconds (if that) on the topic. They usually stick it in really quick and there is almost no reason to argue the point. Until recently i've not done so.
Quote... it's just adolescent foolishness dressed up as "modern" lifestyle, given philosophical credibility by man-hating harpies.
Well-written, bachelor tom (as usual).
QuoteDuring the trial, the plaintiffs portrayed one district manager as particularly abusive, so much so that he showed women pornographic images and invited them to sit on his lap.
That is not abusive.
Did the women tell him point blank not to show them the images after the first time? Did he threaten the women with demotion or lack of promotion if they did not sit on his lap or look at the pictures? Women in the workplace need to learn to draw lines by speaking to those who are offensive to them. Most likely the men do not realize what they are doing is so offensive, and once told will back off.
I believe an earlier post referred to a woman who sought to shatter the glass ceiling by creating an all-female company (advertising or video production, I believe)...it only lasted a year. the female CEO said she'd never do it again because of the overwhelming nonstop drama her staff created in (or brought to) the workplace. There was backstabbing, insubordination, single-mother emergency absences, other domestic issues, PMS, sexual harrassment (incredibly, staff members talked about sex endlessly, then started arguing about it, then used it to eliminate rivals), more than enough physical and mental illness to go around, etc. etc. etc.
Statistically, female-run businesses make less profits than male-run businesses. That's not a stab at female-run businesses, it shows that they're less concerned with the bottom line. However, in a practical sense, they have difficulty competing with similar male-run businesses. A good stock retort to feminists should be "You're so qualified, start your own business."
Finally, since graduating college in 1990, probably 3/4ths of my bosses or supervisors (in about 20 different jobs) have been female.
QuoteAfter Bieber jokingly called Kardashian his "girlfriend" on his Twitter page, the pop star's two million Twitter fans began to threaten the sexy reality star.
This goes against everything the feminists said about men and women. According to them, men will use violence to get their way because they're aggressive, egotistical, selfish and uncaring. The behaviour from the girls suggests that there are many girls willing to use violence to get what they want and, do not care about the consequences it has on other people. This shows there are many young girls who are everything the feminists said about men.
How many men threaten to kill the men who date Pamela Anderson? I've never heard of one doing it.
Western feminists ignore social class in their pronouncements. Working class girls will raise a fist without hesitation, while "nice" middle class ladies might not use violence as a first option. The same may be true for men (I don't know the stats, just going by personal observation here)
There is a link between violence and class.
QuoteAfter Bieber jokingly called Kardashian his "girlfriend" on his Twitter page, the pop star's two million Twitter fans began to threaten the sexy reality star.
This goes against everything the feminists said about men and women. According to them, men will use violence to get their way because they're aggressive, egotistical, selfish and uncaring. The behaviour from the girls suggests that there are many girls willing to use violence to get what they want and, do not care about the consequences it has on other people. This shows there are many young girls who are everything the feminists said about men.
How many men threaten to kill the men who date Pamela Anderson? I've never heard of one doing it.
The woman's comment about men running 3 levels of Government is a fallacy. She based it on the sole fact that most of the representatives in Parliament and the Senate are men. What she didn't acknowledge is the fact that the members of the Parliament and Senate are required to act in favour of the people they represent. Since the bulk of the people they represent are women -- women vote more than men and are more likely to band together -- the members of Parliament and Senate need to bow to women's demands. Failure to meet women's demands will lead to them been voted out of office. Therefore, men do not run all three levels of Government.
Boiled down to it's essence, Game is learning to be largely unaffected by female beauty. It strips away Chivalry, and introduces you to the base nature of women...you know, the kind that like their bums in the air and their face repeatedly pounding a pillow?
Which, by the way, is damn near all of them.
But mostly, Game is a confidence builder in a meaningful way.
Think of it like this. You start a new job in an unfamiliar field, and the work is complex. Would you rather start that job fresh off the street, or would you think some education might be in order?
Game is education and training for dealing with women.