Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Masterpiece

Main / Free Energy - a goal for MRA's
Sep 16, 2004, 03:30 AM
Hi guys.

Look, we need some kind of goal for the Mens movemement. I think we should stop bitching and work towards a common goal. And I suggest we make free energy something for MRA's to strive for. Besides beeing free energy it would also undermine the current power structures. What do you say?

I haven't actually seen these apparatus. But they look very very promising. And the opportunities it would provide us are endless.

I still think this homepage provides all the basic answers to what feminsim is. It's nothing but a Rockerfeller creation. In fact - it's  just another Nazi army of psychological warfare. So why don't we aim our guns at the Rockerfeller Foundation? Address the cause and not the symptoms?

Main / When do we dispense with the bull...
Sep 14, 2004, 08:46 AM
Hey Guys.

Look...when are MRA's going to dispense with the bullsh** and their  fighting with feminism ONLY? Like feminism is our main problem. When are you going to wake up to the New World Order? Anyone who can't see the elite is using feminism as a tool for establishing a new Roman Fascist "Wellfare" Empire by using female voters to vote for it - and 911 as an excuse to expand the "Project for the New American Century" to the rest of the world has to be damn blind.

By the way...America is probably finished. You are going down and so are we in Europe if you do. Both economicly, spiritually and physicly. Can we discuss feminism in this context now?

Sorry for this very intimidating post. But frankly...we're running out of time. And this is not just an American problem. Your problems are the worlds problems. Let's get down to business god damn it...

Main / File Release: Goodbye Daddy
Aug 23, 2004, 03:48 AM
In 1999, a court order prohibited the airing of a controversial documentary exposing critical flaws in the application and procedure of justice in Denmark. This was done on the grounds that one of the girls in the documentary was visible in the recordings allegedly compromising her privacy. The girl in the documentary however, was blurred out, her voice made unrecognizable and every form of personal data was removed. Still the court persisted in their prohibiting this documentary from being shown.

The court, with this judgment, disregarded years of guidelines, related to privacy and the free press. The courts descision was appealed and the documentary aired 14 days later - at midnight!

"Goodbye Daddy" had utilized a hidden camera, and showed how these applications and procedures in conjunction with false accusations of incest, are often used as weaponry during disputes over visitation and custody rights.

Denmark agreed to the 'UN Convention on the Rights of the Child' in 1991 which clearly states that: "a child has a right to both parents". This file is a "must see" guys.

*** Please be aware, that you must have a download engine that will access the Overnet/edonkey network to get this file. You can get the DE-engine here:

Installation instructions are here: ***

Genre: Documentary
Video Codec: DivX 5.1.1
Video: ~570 kbit/s
Runtime: 58 Min
Audio Format: ~64kbit/s MP3 CBR
Aspect Ratio: 4:3
Frame Size: 352x264
Framerate: 25,000 fps
Language: Danish (English subtitles)

Hit this link and the file will begin downloading.

Main / Help with translation
Aug 17, 2004, 05:54 AM
Hi Guys.

I'm currently writing english subtitles for a documentary which has gained cult-status among divorced fathers fighting over custody in Denmark. It exposes the most outrageous abuse of the criminal system and especially in relation to false charges with incest and abuse in general. It shows hidden recordings of the most outrageous psychological evaluations, fathers survaillanced by social workers on the grounds of NOTHING and hidden recordings of an infamous female lawyer who is best known for her use of false charges with incest in Denmark. However, my english is far from perfect and I plan to release this file, english subtitled, on the file sharing networks - and all the Mens For Justice forums I can find. I've translated nearly half of it by now and it will amount to somwehere around 20 A4-pages when done. Is anyone in here interested in helping me out with bad grammar and syntaxes when I'm done? I will translate to the best of my ability but I could surely need some help with spelling and grammar.



P.S. What is the proper term for fathers seeing their children regularly  - like having their children on weekends on a regular basis? Is there a word for that situation in english?
Hi Guys.

Please watch this movie. If everything said in this movie can be verified, then you'll probabaly begin to understand what NOW and other Women's Organizations are to be used for. I've always wondered how on earth so many officials can turn logic on it's head when argueing "equality" (read as: inversed UNequality).

I've spend the last ½ a year seaching for other answers, and it has become increasingly clear to me, that our problems hardly comes from the Womens Movement itself, but rather from The New World Order.

Global Governance: The quiet War against American Independence
This document is the doctrine adopted by the Policy Committee of the Bilderburg
Group during its first known meeting in 1954. A copy found in 1969 was in the
possession of Navel Intelligence. The following document, dated May 1979, was
found on July 7, 1986, in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a surplus

Top Secret

Silent Weapons for a Quiet War

An Introductory Programming Manual
Operations Research
Technical Manual

This publication marks the 25th anniversary of the Third World War, called the "Quiet
War," being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with "silent

This book contains an introductory description of this war, its strategies, and
its weaponry.

May 1979 #74-1120


It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a
society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on
a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social
control and destruction of human life, i .e., slavery and genocide.

This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing must be
secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a technically
formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or group of
persons in a position of great power, and without the full knowledge and consent
of the public, uses such knowledge and methodology for economic conquest -- it
must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said person
or group of persons and the public.

The solution of today's problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly candid,
with no agonizing over religious, moral, or cultural values.

You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at human
society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your observations and
conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without a loss of
discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best interest. Do
not deviate from them.


Silent weapon technology has evolved from Operations Research (O.R.), a
strategic and tactical methodology developed under the military management in
England during World War II. The original purpose of Operations Research was to
study the strategic and tactical problems of air and land defense with the
objective of effective use of limited military resources against foreign enemies
(i.e., logistics).

It was soon recognized by those in positions of power that the same methods
might be useful for totally controlling a society. But better tools were

Social engineering (the analysis and automation of a society) requires the
correlation of great amounts of constantly changing economic information (data),
so a high speed computerized data processing system was necessary which could
race ahead of the society and predict when society would arrive for capitulation.

Relay computers were too slow, but the electronic computer, invented in 1946 by
J. Presper Eckert and John W. Mauchly filled the bill.

The next breakthrough was the development of the simplex method of linear
programming in 1947 by the mathematician, George B. Dantzig.

Then, in 1948, the transistor, invented by J. Bardeen, W. H. Brattain, and W.
Shockley, promised great expansion of the computer field by reducing space and
power requirements.

With these three inventions under their direction, those in positions of power
strongly suspected that it was possible for them to control the whole world with
the push of a button.

Immediately, the Rockefeller Foundation got in on the ground floor by making a
four year grant to Harvard College, funding the Harvard economic research
project for the study of the structure of the American economy. One year later,
in 1949, the United States Air Force joined in.

In 1952 the original great period terminated, and a high level meeting of the
elite was held to determine the next phase of social operations research. The
Harvard project had been very fruitful as is borne out by the publication of
some of its results in 1953 suggesting the feasibility of economic (social)
engineering. (Studies in the Structure of the American Economy -- copyright 1953
by Wassily Leontief, International Sciences Press Inc., White Plains, New York.)

Engineered in the last half decade of the 1940's, the new Quiet War machine
stood, so to-speak, in sparkling gold plated hardware on the showroom floor by

With the creation of the Maser in 1954, the promise of unlocking unlimited
sources of fusion atomic energy from the heavy hydrogen in sea water and the
consequent availability of unlimited social power became a possibility only
decades away.

The combination was irresistible.

The Quiet War was quietly declared by the international elite at a meeting held
in 1954.

Although the silent weapons system was nearly exposed 13 years later, the
evolution of the new weapon system has never suffered any major setbacks.

This volume marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of the Quiet War.
Already this domestic war has had many victories on many fronts throughout the


In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it was
only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public would be
able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the new
silent weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they were for
providing a private utopia.

The issue of primary concern that of dominance, revolved around the subject of
the energy sciences.


Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science is the
study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science,
theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and control of
social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems; mathematics. Therefore, mathematics
is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the public can
be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.

All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is
control. Beyond this remains only one issue, "who will be the beneficiary?".

In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral
Issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that
a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better
than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are beasts of burden
and steaks on the table by choice and consent.

CONSEQUENTLY, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it
was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an
ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth)
of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined,
responsible, and worthy few.

In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and
apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class of weapons so subtle and
sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn
for themselves the name 'silent weapons'.

In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the magnates
of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and services, is
the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and manipulatable.

In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low class elements of the
society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be house-broken, trained,
and assigned a yoke and long term social duties from a very early age, before
they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter. In order to
achieve such conformity, the lower class family unit must be disintegrated by a
process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment of
government operated day care centers for the occupationally orphaned children.

The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest sort,
so that the meat of ignorance isolating the the inferior class from the superior
class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an
initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any hope of
extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of slavery is
essential to maintaining some measure of social order, peace, and tranquility
for the ruling upper class.


Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a silent
weapon by its creators, but only in it its own manner of functioning.

It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing, instead
of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead of
grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a computer
programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate, instead
of a military general.

It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or mental
injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social life.

Yet it makes an unmistakable 'noise', causes unmistakable physical and mental
damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e., unmistakable
to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.

The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe that they
are being attached and subdued by a weapon.

The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because of the
technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling in a
rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do not
know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to defend
themselves against it.

When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public adjusts/adapts
to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives until the
pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack up.

Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological war fare. It attacks the
vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by knowing,
understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and social
energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and weaknesses.


"Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its laws."

Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)

Today's silent weapons technology is an outgrowth of a simple idea discovered,
succinctly expressed, and effectively applied by the quoted Mr. Mayor Amschel
Rothschild. Mr. Rothschild discovered the missing passive component of economic
theory known as economic inductance. He, of course, did not think of his
discovery in these 20th century terms, and to be sure, mathematical analysis had
to wait for the Second Industrial Revolution, the rise of the theory of
mechanics and electronics, and finally, the invention of the electronic computer
before it could be effectively applied in the control of the world economy.


In the study of energy systems, there always appear three elementary concepts.
These are potential energy, kinetic energy, and energy dissipation. And
corresponding to these concepts, there are three idealized, essentially pure
physical counterparts, called passive components.

(1) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of of potential energy
is associated with a physical property called elasticity or stiffness, and can
be represented by a stretched spring.

In electronic science, potential energy is stored in a capacitor instead of a
spring. This property is called capacitance instead of elasticity or stiffness.

(2) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of kinetic energy is
associated with a physical property called inertia or mass and can be
represented by a mass or a flywheel in motion.

In electronic science, kinetic energy is stored in an inductor (in a magnetic
field) instead of a mass. This property is called inductance instead of inertia.

(3) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of energy dissipation
is associated with a physical property called friction or resistance, and can be
represented by a dashpot or other device which converts system energy into heat.

In electronic science, dissipation of energy is performed by an element called
either a resistor or a conductor, the term 'resistor' being the one generally
used to express the concept of friction, and the term 'conductor' being
generally used to describe a more ideal device (e.g., wire) employed to convey
electric energy efficiently from one location to another. The property of a
resistor or conductor is measured as either resistance or conductance,

In economics these three energy concepts are associated with:

(1) Economic Capacitance -- Capital (money, stock/inventory, investments in
building and durables, etc.)

(2) Economic Conductance -- Goods (production flow coefficients)

(3) Economic Inductance -- Services (the influence of the population of industry
on output).

All of the mathematical theory developed in the study of one energy system, (e.g.,
mechanics, electronics, etc.) can be immediately applied in the study of any
other energy system (e.g., economics).


What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic principle of power, influence,
and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is "when you
assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you".

Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had the
required appearance of power that could be used to induce people (inductance,
with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their real
wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation).
They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory notes. Mr.
Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for, so long
as he had someone's stock of gold as a persuader to show to his customers.

Mr. Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individuals and to governments.
These would create over-confidence. Then he would make money scarce, tighten
control of the system, and collect his collateral through the obligation of
contracts. The cycle was then repeated. These pressures could be used to ignite
a war. Then he would control the availability of currency to determine who would
win the war. That government which agreed to give him control of its economic
system got his support. Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to
the enemy of the debtor. The profit derived from this economic methodology made
Mr. Rothschild all the more wealthy and all the more able to extend his wealth.
He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by government
order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the
production of goods and services (gross national product, GNP).


In this structure, credit, presented as a pure circuit element called "currency",
has the appearance of capital, but is, in fact, negative capital. Hence, it has
the appearance of service, but is, in fact, indebtedness or debt. It is
therefore an economic inductance instead of an economic capacitance, and if
balanced in no other way, will be balanced by the negation of population (war,
genocide). The total goods and services represents real capital called the gross
national product, and currency may be printed up to this level and still
represent economic capacitance; but currency printed beyond this level is
subtractive, represents the introduction of economic inductance, and constitutes
notes of indebtedness. War is therefore the balancing of the system by killing
the true creditors (the public which we have taught to exchange true value for
inflated currency) and falling back on whatever is left of the resources of
nature and the regeneration of those resources.

Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency gave him the power to rearrange the  
economic structure to his own advantage,, to shift economic inductance to those
economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic instability and

The final key to economic control had to wait until there was sufficient data
and high speed computing equipment to keep close watch on the economic
oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits -- (paper


The aviation field provided the greatest evolution in economic engineering by
way of the mathematical theory of shock testing. In this process, a projectile
is fired from an airframe on the ground and the impulse of the recoil is
monitored by vibration transducers connected to the airframe and wired to chart
recorders. By studying the echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in the
airframe, it is possible to discover critical vibrations in the structure of the
airframe which either vibrations of the negine or aeolian vibrations of the
wings, or a combination of the two, might reinforce resulting in a reconant self-destruction
of the airframe in flight as an aircraft. From the standpoint of engineering,
this means that the strengths and weaknesses of the structure of the airframe in
terms of vibrational energy can be discovered and manipulated.


To use this method of airframe shock testing in economic engineering, the prices
of commodities are shocked, and the public consumer reaction is monitored. The
resulting echoes of the economic shock are interpreted theoretically by
computers and the psycho-economic structure of the economy is thus discovered.
It is by this process that partial differential and difference matricos are
discovered that define the family household and make possible its evolution as
an economic industry (dissipative consumer structure). Then the response of the
household to future shocks can be predicted and manipulated, and society becomes
a well regulated animal with its reins under the control of a sophisticated
computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system.

Eventually every individual element of the structure comes under computer
control through a knowledge of personal preferences, such knowledge guaranteed
by computer association of consumer preferences (universal product code -- UPC --
zebra stripe pricing codes on packages) with identified consumers (identified
via association with the use of a credit card and later a permanent 'tattooed'
body number invisible under normal ambient illumination.


Economics is only a social extension of a natural energy system. It, also, has
its three passive components. Because of the distribution of wealth and the lack
of communication and consequent lack of data, this field has been the last
energy field for which a knowledge of these three passive components has been

Since energy is the key to all activity on the face of the earth, it follows
that in order to attain a monopoly of energy, raw materials, goods, and services
and to establish a world system of slave labor, it is necessary to have a first
strike capability in the field of economics. In order to maintain our position,
it is necessary that we have absolute first knowledge of the science of control
over all economic factors and the first experience at engineering the world

In order to achieve such sovereignty, we must at least achieve this one end:
that the public will not make either the logical or mathematical connection
between economics and the other energy sciences or learn to apply such knowledge.

This is becoming increasingly difficult to control because more and more
businesses are making demands upon their computer programmers to create and
apply mathematical models for the management of those businesses.

It is only a matter of time before the new breed of private programmer/economists
will catch on to the far reaching implications of the work begun at Harvard in
1948. The speed with which they can communicate their warning to the public will
largely depend upon how effective we have been at controlling the media,
subverting education, and keeping the public distracted with matters of no real


Economics, as a social energy science has as a first objective the description
of the complex way in which any given unit of resources is used to satisfy some
economic want. (Leontief Matrix) The first objective, when it is extended to get
the most product from the least or limited resources, comprises that objective
of general military) and industrial logistics known as Operations Research. (See
simplex method of linear programming.)

The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-) was an extension of World War II
Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of controlling an
economy; at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It was felt
that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly as
easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and control
the trajectory of a projectile. Such as proven to be the case. Moreover, the
economy has been transformed into a guided missile on target.

The immediate aim of the Harvard project was to discover the economic structure,
what forces change that structure, how the behavior of the structure can be
predicted, and how it can be manipulated. What was needed was a well organized
knowledge of the mathematical structures and interrelationships of investment,
production, distribution, and consumption. To make a short story of it all, it
was discovered than an economy obeyed the same, laws as electricity and that all
of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed for the
electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics. This
discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were and are
kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model, human life
is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when opening a
switch connected to an active inductor in mathematically analogous to the
initiation of a war.

The greatest hurdle which theoretical economists faced was the accurate
description of the household as an industry. This is a challenge, because
consumer purchases are a matter of choice which in turn is influenced by income,
price, and other economic factors.

This hurdle was cleared in an indirect and statistically approximate way by an
application of shock testing to determine the current characteristics, called
current technical coefficients, of a household industry. Why GAS Costs $2.00 Per

Finally, because problems in theoretical economics can be translated very easily
into problems in theoretical electronics, and the solution translated back again,
it follows that only a book of language translation and concept definition
needed to be written for economics. The remainder could be gotten from standard
works on mathematics and electronics. This makes the publication of books on
advanced economics unnecessary, and greatly simplifies project security.


An ideal industry is defined as a device which receives value from other
industries in several forms and converts it into one specific product for sales
and distribution to other industries. It has several inputs and one output. What
the public normally thinks of as one industry is really an industrial complex
where several industries under one roof produce one or more products.

The flow of product from industry #1 (supply) to industry #2 (demand) is denoted
by 112. The total flow out of industry 'K' is denoted by I k . (sales, etc.)

A node is a symbol of collection and distribution of flow. Node #3 receives from
industry #3 and distributes to industries #1 through #3. If industry #3
manufactures chairs, then a flow from Industry #3 back to industry #3 simply  
indicates that industry #3 is using part of its own output product, for example,
as office furniture. Therefore, the flow may be summarized by the equations:


Industries fell into three categories or class by type of output.

Class #1 - Capital (resources)

Class #2 - Goods (commodities or use - dissipative)

Class #3 - Services (action of population)

Class # 1 Industries exist at three levels

(1) Nature - sources of energy and raw materials.

(2) Government - printing of currency equal to gross national product (GNP), and
extension of currency in excess of GNP.

(3) Banking - loaning of money for interest, and extension (counterfeiting) of
economic value through deposit loan account - inflation.

Class # 2 industries exist as producers of tangible or consumer (dissipated)
products. This sort of activity is usually recognized and labeled by the public
as an 'industry'.

Class # 3 industries are those which have service rather than a tangible product
as their output. These industries are called (1) households, and (2) governments.
Their output is human activity of a mechanical sort, and their basis is


The whole economic system can be represented by a three industry model if one
allows the names of the outputs to be (1) capital, (2) goods, and (3) services.
The problem with this representation is that it would not show the influence of,
say, the textile industry on the ferrous metal industry. This is because both
the textile industry and the ferrous metal industry would be contained within a
single classification called the 'goods industry' and by this process of
combining or aggregating these two industries under one system block they would
lose their economic individuality.


A national economy consists of simultaneous flows of production, distribution,
consumption, and investment. If all of these elements including labor and human
functions are assigned a numerical value in like units of measure, say, 1939
dollars, on this flow can be further represented by a current flow in an
electronic circuit, and its behavior can be predicted and manipulated with
useful precision.

The three ideal passive energy components of electronics, the capacitor, the
resistor, and the inductor correspond to the three ideal passive energy
components of economics called the pure industries of capital, goods, and
services, resp..

Economic capacitance represents the storage of capital in one form or another.

Economic conductance represents the level of conductance of materials for the
production of goods.

Economic inductance represents the inertia of economic value in motion. This is
a population phenomenon known as services.


An electrical inductor (e.g., a coil of wire) has an electric current as its
primary phenomenon and a magnetic field as its secondary phenomenon (inertia).
Corresponding to this, an economic inductor has a flow of economic value as its
primary phenomenon and a population field as its secondary phenomenon of inertia.
When the flow of economic value (e.g., money) diminishes, the human population
field collapses in order to keep the economic value (money) flowing (extreme
case - war).

The public inertia is a result of consumer buying habits, expected standard of
living, etc., and is generally a phenomenon of self-preservation.


(1) Population

(2) magnitude of the economic activities of the government.

(3) the method of financing these government activities (see Peter-Paul
Principle-inflation of the currency)


(A few examples will be given.)

CHARGE -- coulombs

-- dollars (1939).

FLOW/CURRENT -- amperes (coulombs per second)

-- dollars of flow per year.

MOTIVATING FORCE -- volts -- dollars (output) demand.

CONDUCTANCE -- amperes per volt.

-- dollars of flow per year per dollar demand.

CAPITANCE -- coulombs per volt.

-- dollars of production inventory/stock per dollar demand.


An ideal industry may be symbolized electronically in various ways. The simplest
way is to represent a demand by a voltage and a supply by a current. When this
is done, the relationship between the two becomes what is called an admittance,
which can result from three economic factors: (1) hindsight flow, 2) present
flow, and (3) foresight flow.

Foresight flow is the result of that property of living entities to cause energy
(food) to be stored for a period of low energy (e.g., a winter season). It
consists of demands made upon an economic system for that period of low energy (winter
season). In a production industry it takes several forms, one of which is known
as production stock or inventory. In electronic symbology this specific industry
demand (a pure capital industry) is represented by capacitance and the stock or
resource is represented by a stored charge. Satisfaction of an industry demand
suffers a lag because of the loading effect of inventory priorities.

Present flow ideally involves no delays. It is, so to speak, input today for
output today, a 'hand to mouth' flow. In electronic symbology, this specific
industry demand (a pure use industry) is represented by a conductance which is
then a simple economic valve (a dissipative element).

Hindsight flow is known as habit or inertia. In electronics, this phenomenon is
the characteristic of an inductor (economic analog = a pure service industry) in
which a current flow (economic analog = flow of money) creates a magnetic field
(economic analog = active human population) which, if the current (money flow)
begins to diminish, collapses (war) to maintain the current (flow of money --

Other large alternatives to war as economic inductors or economic flywheels are
an open-ended social welfare program, or enormous (but fruitful) open-ended
space program.

The problem with stabilizing the economic system is that there is too much
demand on account of (1) too much greed and (2) too much population.

This creates excessive economic inductance which can only be balanced with
economic capacitance (true resources or value - e.g. in goods or services). The
social welfare program is nothing more than an open-ended credit balance system
which creates a false capital industry to give non-productive people a roof over
their heads and food in their stomachs. This can be useful, however, because the
recipients become state property, in return for the 'gift' , a standing array
for the elite. For he who pays the piper, picks the tune. Those who get hooked
on the economic drug, must go to the elite for a fix. In this, the method of
introducing large amounts of stabilizing capacitance is by borrowing on the
future 'credit' of the world. This is a fourth law of motion -- onset, and
consists of performing an action and leaving the system before the reflected
reaction returns to the point of action -- a delayed reaction. The means of
surviving the reaction is by changing the system before the reaction can return.
By this means, politicians become popular in their own time and the public pays
for it later. In fact the measure of such a politician is the delay time. The
same thing is achieved by a government by printing money beyond the limit of the
gross national product, an economic process called inflation. This puts a large
quantity of money into the hands of the public and maintains a balance against
their greed, creates a false self-confidence in them and, for a while, stays the
wolf from the door.

They must eventually resort to war to balance the account, because war
ultimately is merely the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the public
conscience. (See section on consent factors and social-economic structuring.)

If the people really cared about their fellow man, they would control their
appetites (greed, procreation, etc.) so that they would not have to operate on a
credit or welfare social system which steals from this worker to satisfy the bum.

Since most of the general public will not exercise restraint, there are only two
alternatives to reduce the economic inductance of the system.

(1) Let the populace bludgeon each other to death in war, which will only result
in a total destruction of the living earth.

(2) Take control of the world by the use of economic 'silent weapons' in a form
of 'quiet warfare', and reduce the economic inductance of the world to a safe
level by a process of benevolent slavery and genocide.

The latter option has been taken as the obviously better option. At this point
it should be crystal clear to the reader why absolute secrecy about the silent
weapons is necessary. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality
and its faith in its fellow man. It has become a herd of proliferating
barbarians, and, so' to speak, a blight upon the fate of the earth. They do not
care enough about economic science to learn why they have not been able to avoid
war despite religious morality, and their religious or self-gratifying refusal
to deal with earthly problems renders the solution of the earthly problem
unreachable by them. It is left to those few who are truly willing to think and
survive as the fittest to survive, to solve the problem for themselves as the
few who really care. Otherwise, exposure of the silent weapon would destroy our
only hope of preserving the seed of future true humanity.


The industries of finance (banking), manufacturing, and government, real
counterparts of the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, are easily
defined because they are generally logically structured. Because of this their
processes can be described mathematically and their technical coefficients can
be easily deduced. This, however, is not the case with the service industry
known as the household industry.


When the industry flow diagram is represented by a 2-block system of households
on the right and all other industries on the left, the following results.

(labor, etc.)

The arrows from left to right labeled A, B, C, etc., denote flow of economic
value from the industries in the left hand block to the industry in the right
hand block called 'households'. These may be thought of as the monthly consumer
flows of the following commodities. A - alcoholic beverages, B - beef, C -
coffee, ..., U - unknown, etc..

The problem which a theoretical economist faces is that the consumer preferences
of any household is not easily predictable and the technical coefficients of any
one household tend to be a non-linear, very complex, and variable function
income, prices, etc.

Computer information derived from the use of the universal product code in
conjunction with credit card purchase as an individual household identifier
could change this state of affairs. But the U.P.C. method is not yet available
on a national or even a significant regional scale. To compensate for this data
deficiency, an alternate indirect approach of analysis has been adopted known as
economic shock testing. This method, widely used in the aircraft manufacturing
industry develops an aggregate statistical sort of data.

Applied to economics, this means that all of the households in one region or in
the whole nation are studied as a group or class rather than individually, and
the mass behavior rather than individual behavior is used to discover useful
estimates of the technical coefficients governing the economic structure of the
hypothetical single household industry.

Notice in the industry flow diagram that the values for the flows A,B,C, etc.,
are accessible to measurement in terms of selling prices and total sales of

One method of evaluating the technical coefficients of the household industry
depends upon shocking the prices of a commodity and noting the changes in the
sales of all of the commodities.


In recent times, the application of Operations Research to the study of the
public economy has been obvious for anyone who understands the principles of
shock testing.

In the shock testing of an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse of firing a gun
mounted on that airframe causes shock waves in that structure which tell
aviation engineers the conditions under which parts of the airplane or the whole
airplane or its wings will start to vibrate or flutter like a guitar string, a
flute reed, or a tuning fork, and disintegrate or fall apart in flight.

Economic engineers achieve the same result in studying the behavior of the
economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity such
as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar and then causing a sudden change or shock in
its price or availability, thus kicking everybody's budget and buying habits out
of shape.

They then observe the shock waves which result by monitoring the changes in
advertising, prices, and sales of that and other commodities.

The objective of such studies is to acquire know-how to set the public economy
into a predictable state of motion or change, even a controlled self-destructive
state of motion which will convince the public that certain "expert" people
should take control of the money system and reestablish security (rather than
liberty and justice) for all. When the subject citizens are rendered unable to
control their financial affairs, they of course, become totally enslaved, a
source of cheap labor.

Not only the prices of commodities, but also the availability of labor can be
used as the means of shock testing. Labor strikes deliver excellent test shocks
to an economy, especially in the critical service areas of trucking (transportation),
communication, public utilities (energy, water, garbage collection), etc.

By shock testing, it is found that there is a direct relationship between the
availability of money flowing in an economy and the psychological outlook and
response of masses of people dependent upon that availability.

For example, there is a measurable, quantitative relationship between the price
of gasoline, and the probability that a person would experience a headache, feel
a need to watch a violent movie, smoke a cigarette, or go to a tavern for a mug
of beer.

It is most interesting that, by observing and measuring the economic modes by
which the public tries to run from their problems and escape from reality, and
by applying the mathematical theory of Operations Research, it is possible to
program computers to predict the most probable combination of created events (shocks)
which will bring about a complete control and subjugation of the public through
a subversion of the public economy (by shaking the plum tree).


Let the prices and total sales of commodities be given and symbolized as follows.

Let us assume a simple economic model in which the total number of important (staple)
commodities are represented as beef, gasoline, and an aggregate of all other
staple commodities which we will call the hypothetical miscellaneous staple
commodity 'M'. (e.g., M is an aggregate of C, S, T, U, etc..)


Economic amplifiers are the active components of economic engineering. The basic
characteristic of any amplifier, (mechanical, electrical, or economic) is that
it receives an input control signal and delivers energy from an independent
energy, source to a specified output terminal in a predictable relationship to
that input control signal.

The simplest form of economic amplifier is a device called advertising.

If a person is spoken to by a T.V. advertiser as if he were a twelve year old,
then, due to suggestibility, he will, with a certain probability, respond or
react to that suggestion with the uncritical response of a twelve year old and
will reach into his economic reservoir and deliver its energy to buy that
product on impulse when he passes it in the store.

An economic amplifier may have several inputs and outputs. Its response might be
instantaneous or delayed. Its circuit symbol might be a rotary switch if its
options are exclusive, qualitative, 'go' or 'no go', or it might have its
parametric input/output relationships specified by a matrix with internal energy
sources represented.

Whatever its form might be, its purpose is to govern the flow of energy from a
source to an output sink in direct relationship to an input control signal. For
this reason, it is called an active circuit element or component.

Economic Amplifiers fall into classes called strategies, and in comparison with
electronic amplifiers, the specific internal functions or an economic amplifier
are called logistical instead of electrical.

Therefore, economic amplifiers not only deliver power gain, but also, in effect,
are used to cause changes in the economic circuitry.

In the design of an economic amplifier we must have some idea of at least five
functions, which are:

(1) the available input signals,

(2) the desired output control objectives,

(3) the strategic objective,

(4) the available economic power sources,

(5) the logistical options.

The process of defining and evaluating these factors and incorporating the
economic amplifier into an economic system has been popularly called game theory.

The design of an economic amplifier begins with a specification of the power
level of the output, which can range from personal to national. The second
condition is accuracy of response, i.e., how accurately the output action is a
function of the input commands. High gain combined with strong feedback helps to
deliver the required precision. Most of the error will be in the input data
signal. Personal input data tends to be specific, while national input data
tends to be statistical.


Questions to be answered:

(1) what (3) where (5) why

(2) when (4) how (6) who

General sources of information:

(1) telephone taps (3) analysis of garbage

(2) surveillance (4) behavior of children in school

Standard of living by:

(1) food (3) shelter

(2) clothing (4) transportation

Social contacts:

(1) telephone - itemized record of calls

(2) family - marriage certificate, birth certificates, etc.

(3) friends, associates, etc.

(4) memberships in organizations

(5) political affiliation


Personal buying habits, i.e.,

Personal consumer preferences:

(1) checking accounts

(2) credit card purchases

(3) ' tagged' credit card purchases - the credit card purchase of products
bearing the U.P.C. (Universal Product Code)


(1) checking accounts (5) automobile, etc.

(2) savings accounts (6) safety deposit at bank

(3) real estate (7) stock market

(4) business


(1) creditors (3) loans

(2) enemies (see legal) (4) consumer credit

Government sources (ploys)*:

(1) Welfare (4) doles

(2) Social Security (5) grants

(3) U.S.D.A. surplus food (6) subsidies

Government sources (via intimidation)

(1) Internal Revenue Service

(2) OSHA

(3) Census

(4) etc.

* Principle of this ploy -- the citizen will almost always make the collection
of information easy if he can operate on the 'free sandwich principle' of 'eat
now, and pay later'.

Other Government sources -- surveillance of U.S. Mail.


Strengths and weaknesses:

(1) activities (sports, hobbies, etc.)

(2) see 'legal' (fear, anger, etc. - crime record)

(3) hospital records (drug sensitivities, reaction to pain, etc.)

(4) psychiatric records (fears, angers, disgusts, adaptability, reactions to
stimuli, violence, suggestibility or hypnosis, pain, pleasure, love and sex)

Methods of coping -- adaptability -- behavior:

(1) consumption of alcohol

(2) consumption of drugs

(3) entertainment

(4) religious factors influencing behavior

(5) other methods of escaping from reality.

Payment modus operandi (MO) -- pay on time, etc.:

(1) payment of telephone bills

(2) energy purchases (electric, gas...)

(3) water purchases

(4) repayment of loans

(5) house payments

(6) automobile payments

(7) payments on credit cards

Political sensitivity:

(1) beliefs (3) position (5) projects/activities

(2) contacts (4) strengths/weaknesses

Legal inputs - behavior control

(Excuses for investigation, search, arrest, or employment of force to modify

(1) court reports (4) reports made to police

(2) police records - NCIC (5) insurance information

(3) driving record (6) anti-establishment acquaintances


Business sources (via I.R.S., etc.):

(1) prices of commodities

(2) sales

(3) investments in

(a) stocks/inventory

(b) production tools and machinery

(c) buildings and improvements

(d) the stock market

Banks and credit bureaus:

(1) credit information

(2) payment information

Miscellaneous Sources:

(1) polls and surveys

(2) publications

(3) telephone records

(4) energy and utility purchases


Outputs - create controlled situations

- manipulation of the economy. hence society

- control by control of compensation and losses.


(1) allocates opportunities.

(2) destroys opportunities.

(3) controls the economic industry.

(4) controls the availability of raw materials

(5) controls capital.

(6) controls bank rates.

(7) controls the inflation of the currency.

(8) controls the possession of property.

(9) controls the industrial capacity.

(10) controls manufacturing.

(11) controls the availability of goods (commodities).

(12) controls the prices of commodities.

(13) controls services, the labor force, etc.

(14) controls payments to government officials.

(15) controls the legal functions

(16) controls the personal data file uncorrectable - by the party slandered.

(17) controls advertising.

(18) controls media content.

(19) controls material available for T.V. viewing.

(20) disengages attention from real issues.

(21) engages emotions.

(22) creates disorder, chaos, and insanity.

(23) controls design of more probing tax forms.

(24) controls surveillance.

(25) controls the storage of information.

(26) develops psychological analyses and profiles of individuals.

(27) controls legal functions (repeat of 15).

(28) controls sociological factors.

(29) controls health options.

(30) preys on weaknesses.

(31) cripples strengths.

(32) leaches wealth and substance.


Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon and
gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and ignorant
of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused,
disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the other

This is achieved by:

(1) Disengaging their minds, sabotaging their mental activities, by providing a
low quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems design,
and economics, and by discouraging technical creativity.

(2) Engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their
indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:

(a) unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape)
by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media -
especially the T.V. and the newspapers.

(b) giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought" and
depriving them of what they really need.

(3) Rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation,
thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricated
outside priorities.

These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of social
automation technology.

The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the more confusion, the
more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then offer
the solutions.


MEDIA: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues,
and captivated by matters of no real importance.

SCHOOLS: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics,
real law, and real history.

ENTERTAINMENT: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.

WORK: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm
with the other animals.


A silent weapon system operates upon data obtained from a docile public by legal
(but not always lawful) force. Much information is made available to silent
weapon systems programmers through the Internal Revenue Service . (See "Studies
In The Structure Of The American Economy" for an I.R.S. source list.) This
information consists of the enforced delivery of well organized data contained
in federal and state tax forms collected, assembled, and submitted by slave
labor provided by taxpayers and employers. Furthermore, the number of such forms
submitted to the I.R.S. is a useful indicator of public consent, an important
factor in strategic decision making. Other data sources are given in the "Short
List Of Inputs.

Consent Coefficients: numerical feedback indicating victory status.
Psychological basis:

When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without
just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and
is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily
quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay
income tax.


The next step in the process of designing as economic amplifier is discovering
the energy sources. The energy sources which support any primitive economic
system are, of course, a supply of raw materials, and the consent of the people
to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or class in
the social structure; i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the pecking

Each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class
immediately below it, hence preserves the class structure. This provides
stability and security, but also government from the top.

As time goes on and communication and education improve, the lower class
elements of the social labor structure become knowledgeable and envious of the
good things that the upper class members have. They also begin to attain a
knowledge of energy systems and the ability to enforce their rise through the
class structure.

This threatens the sovereignty of the elite.

If this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite can
achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a position of
an essential economic energy source.

Until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of people to
labor and let others handle their affairs must be taken into consideration,
since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final transfer
of energy sources to the control of the elite.

It is essential to recognize that at this time, public consent is still an
essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic amplification.

Therefore, consent as an energy release mechanism will now be considered.


The successful application of a strategy requires a careful study of inputs,
outputs, the strategy connecting the inputs and the outputs, and the available
energy sources to fuel the strategy. This study is called logistics.

A logistical problem is studied at the elementary level first, and then levels
of greater complexity are studied as a synthesis of elementary factors.

This means that a given system is analyzed, i.e., broken down into its sub-systems,
and these in turn are analyzed, until, by this process, one arrives at the
logistical 'atom', the individual.

This is where the process of syntheses properly begins, at the time of the birth
of the individual.


From the time a person leaves its mother's womb, its every effort is directed
toward building, maintaining, and withdrawing into artificial wombs, various
sorts of substitute protective devices or shells.

The objective of these artificial wombs is to provide a stable environment for
both stable and unstable activity; to provide a shelter for the evolutionary
processes of growth, and maturity - i.e., survival; to provide security for
freedom and to provide defensive protection for offensive activity.


The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a political
structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own dependency
relationship of childhood.

Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life, pat
them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner table,
clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that everything
will be alright when they wake up in the morning.

This public demand is incredible, so the human god, the political, meets
incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering nothing.
So who is the bigger liar?, the public?, or the 'godfather'?

This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness and expediency. It is
the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a
disgusting public.


Most people want to be able to subdue and/or kill other human beings which
disturb their daily lives, but they do not want to have to cope with the moral
and religious issues which such an overt act on their part might raise.
Therefore, they assign the dirty work to others (including their own children)
so as to keep the blood off their own hands. They rave about the humane
treatment of animals and then sit down to a delicious hamburger from a
whitewashed slaughterhouse down the street and out of sight. But even more
hypocritical, they pay taxes to finance a professional association of hit men
collectively called politicians, and then complain about corruption in


Again, most people want to be free to do things (to explore, etc.) but they are
afraid to fail.

The fear of failure is manifested in irresponsibility, and especially in
delegating those personal responsibilities to others where success is uncertain
or carries possible or created liabilities (law) which the person is not
prepared to accept.

They want authority (root word - 'author'), but they will not accept
responsibility or liability. They hire politicians to face reality for them.


The people hire the politicians so that the people can:

(1) obtain security without managing it.

(2) obtain action without thinking about it.

(3) inflict theft, injury, and death upon others without having to contemplate
either life or death.

(4) avoid responsibility for their own intentions.

(5) obtain the benefits of reality and science without exerting themselves in
the discipline of facing or learning either of these things.

They give the politicians the power to create and manage a war machine to:

(1) provide for the survival of the NATION/WOMB.

(2) prevent encroachment of anything of anything upon the NATION/WOMB.

(3) destroy the enemy who threatens the NATION/WOMB.

(4) destroy those citizens of their own country who do not conform for the sake
of stability of the NATION/WOMB.

Politicians hold many quasi-military jobs, the lowest being the police which are
soldiers, the attorneys and the C.P.A.s next who are spies and saboteurs (licensed),
and the judges who shout the orders and run the closed union military shop for
whatever the market will bear. The generals are industrialists. The 'presidential'
level of commander-in-chief is shared by the international bankers. The people
know that they have created this farce and financed it with their own taxes (consent),
but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite.

Thus, a nation becomes divided into two very distinct parts, a DOCILE SUB-NATION
and a POLITICAL SUB-NATION. The political sub-nation remains attached to the
docile sub-nation, tolerates it, and leaches its substance until it grows strong
enough to detach itself and devour its parent.


In order to make meaningful computerized economic decisions about war, the
primary economic flywheel, it is necessary to assign concrete logistical values
to each element of the war structure -- personnel and material alike.

This process begins with a clear and candid description of the sub-systems of
such a structure.

THE DRAFT (As military service)

Few efforts of human behavior modification are more remarkable or mor
Main / The Head of the Medusa
Apr 11, 2004, 12:28 AM
Please, read this. This a very good explanation of how and why earlier societies adapted to their sorroundings from a gender perspecrive. It also describes how men as a whole gender is going to get rid off now. I consider us in a real state of war-like circumstances, of the ugliest kind of them all, against a bunch of women.


Has anyone in here thought about psychologically profiling 'aggressive victims'?

Those dangourous victims that wil lie, lie, lie and create violent incidents themselves to BE victims?

Example: Some women act like innocent victims visually (e.g. by gestures - by just acting afraid, thereby getting reason to point out insanity, and then provoke a rise out of their so called attacker), while at the same time attacking verbally. You should be cautious of women like these - they are usually quite anxious, and often perceive the world as terribly evil. They are a bit more "motivated" sort of speak, to interpret 'whatever' as violent behavior, or violence, or attempted rape or anything like that, because they themselves constantly walk at the brink of attack, due to their constant irrationally nervous nature.

I can tell you, that I'm seriously thinking about it myself.


To understand the basic rules of some women's need to place themselves in contradictory relationships with rights vs. obligations, you have to understand how they use their surroundings. First, I will provide a short description of a syndrome known as ""Münchausen by proxy" to ease the understanding.

Münchausen by proxy:

Is a syndrome known mostly among women, and describes how some mothers use their own children as means of drawing attention to themselves, by hurting their own children and therefore creating reasons to require medical attention. The actual damage they inflict on their own children is not the important thing here. What is important is how these women use  proxies to retract themselves into the role of a "devastated mom to a sick child" by using the child as an extension of their own frustration. Thereby drawing the attention to themselves as victims and receive the attention from nurses and doctors without directly expressing their own vulnerability themselves.

Very, very often women's violence and aggressive behaviors are arranged the same way. Women's violence is very often hidden behind a proxy. Either behind the police, social-workers, doctors, friends, or their own children etc. etc.

In this case we are therefore talking about "Violence by proxies".  I wrote an example of how this is practically done here:
And there is really nothing new to this technique. Women have been using it for hundreds of years. Maybe for the thousands? To prove it, I will draw parallels to the older Icelandic Saga's (especially "Njals") which describes the exact same technique - just using other words

What are Saga's.

To those of you who are unfamiliar with the Islandic Saga's and society I will just provide a short description of both.

The word "Saga" can be translated into: "to say". And what characterize Saga's is that they are written imitations of the oral narratives spanning from approximately 870 to 930 where Island were colonized, and further into the Islands prime (930-1030), but written down approximately 200-250 years later. The sentence structures are short and factual and the dialogues idiomatic. Hence, they are supposed to leave the impression of a narrator speaking to known parties. And while Iceland had a system of laws and a judiciary system, there were no law enforcement. This left Icelandic society to rely on oaths and vigilante justice.

Women - the guardians of honor and chivalry:

In the saga-society the women were perceived as guardians of honor. But while women couldn't gain honor without their husbands it therefore became their 'job' to make sure their men (the proxy) acted honorable. Cause if their men lost their honor, the women lost theirs too.

To uphold their men's honor the women mostly used the means of 'eagging' (Icelandic word for bitching). When 'eagging' (bitching) their men, the women often resembled their men with other women in general to make them do as they wished (uphold honor). Nothing was more demeaning for men in Icelandic societies, than being resembled with women and their weak physics. In other words; the women used their men's pride against themselves, to mobilize their aggression and get them to seek out honor for them.

Today, we don't use the word "honor" very often anymore. We have replaced it with "chivalry" instead - but the technique is just the same. Women make their men, or other men, (proxies) do what they expect by calling them whiners, homo's and weak pussy's when they don't do as expected.

The contradictory relationship with rights vs. obligations.

But the most interesting thing about the saga-societies is the contradictory relationship with formal rights vs. actual obligations among women.

1. Formally the women's guardians (which were always men) arranged the marriages, but actually women could just dissolute the relationships they didn't approve of.

2. Formally women had no influence on the legal decisions made by the high council, but could actually dissolute and avoid decisions and sentences by just staying away when decisions were made .

3. Formally it were men's obligation to seek honor for their women, but actually the women 'eagged' (bitch'ed) their men to seek the kind of honor they found appropriate. "Appropriate" was almost always blood-vengeance.

4. Formally women were defined by their husbands, but actually they operated in the background and made the "canon-balls" which men shot in order to gain honor for their wives.

This aspect of women's position in the saga-society becomes most clear when reading "Njals saga" which is also the most popular of them all.

In "Njals saga" we meet Halgerd who arranges an axe in her husbands forehead because she regard him as an unworthy party for herself.
We meet Bergthora who rejects no means at all in order to assert the family-honor.
We meet Gunhild king-mother who settle accounts of her help with sexual contributions from other men.
And we meet queen Kormloed who use her beauty and talent for manipulation to win back Ireland from her ex-husband.

So, formally men made the political decisions on behalf of their women, but the women made the decisions of life and death on behalf of their men. Now we're getting somewhere eh? Do anyone else than myself see A LOT of similarities between our days feminazi-society and the saga-societies?


Main / When Women sexually abuse children
Apr 07, 2004, 07:49 PM
Subconsciously we think that women can't perpetrate sexual violations towards children. But this is in no way true. They most certainly can and they do. It doesn't necessarily take a penis to commit these kinds of sexual violations. Women just use oral sex themselves, or their kids to orally pleasure themselves, fingers - and so on and so forth instead. So let's just get this straight right here and now; women DO perpetrate sexual violations towards children.

Sweden has a hotline for children who get sexually abused at home. And 20% of the callers claim the perpetrator is a woman.

In 1993-94 it was 3%.
In 2003 the percentage had risen to 20%.

Now, you may ask yourself how on earth the percentages can rise so much in just 10 years. And the explanation to this question is found in both our cultural perception of women as saints, which is changing, and the institutionalized countries openness on this subject.

Previously, children usually didn't tell anybody if their mothers abused them sexually. Especially because of the embarrassment that would follow, if the incidents ever got publicly known (among friends, family etc.) So this kind of openness is rather new in socialist/communist/feminazi-countries like Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Which are all supposed to be so much "ahead" when it comes to feminism. Which is true. We are definitely getting ahead on the way to the bottom.

Anyway; in our culture we rapidly associate "sexual abuse" with "acting-outwards" and "sex", therefore we associate further into the word "men", because we still expect men to be those who take action in some way or another.

On the other hand, we are also culturally brainwashed to keep our perception of women as saints intact. That's a neat trick actually. Ha ha. I don't even know whether to weep or laugh. That's how I usually react when told to maintain the illusion of a flat Earth, even though I know it's round.

"Women simply know about children", we think. "They're passionate, solicitous individuals" - and sometimes we even seem to think they carry these qualities genetically.

A lot of these psychologists, nurses, doctors, school teachers and pedagogues the children get in contact with first, are also women. And they too, are burdened by prejudice perceptions of women as pure saints. So they rather want to hear something about male perpetrators than female when these children seek help. Both because they subconsciously strive to maintain the nice image of moms as solicitous, and because they themselves are women. And it's a bit easier to pass uncomfortable perceptions on to the opposite gender when striving to maintain the prejudice.

The right questions are therefore rarely asked. And a great deal of these children, who are now teenagers or young adults can tell some interesting stories about those times back then, where they tried to tell the truth. Which was simply overheard.

You may ask yourself how that can be. So let me give you an example of the circumstances such a child could be up against:

The child or teenager contact his/her social worker, teacher, doctor etc. etc. and  somehow tries to explain that they are sexually abused by mom. This is probably not that easy to do - given all circumstances. Some of these 'treaters' has, of course, quickly noticed trough all the stuttering, that the child tried to communicate some sort of sexual abuse. And when agreed to this -  some of these 'treaters" quickly jumped to conclusions and asked: "ah, who is abusing you - is it your dad? (brother or uncle or whomever)"

So these 'treaters' have simply not wanted to hear that it was a women the child spoke about, and some of the children who are now teenagers or young adults, told they had to change the gender in order to receive help.

This is quite serious business. Because it's not entirely indifferent whether the perpetrator was a man or a woman, because the basic trust in relation to these mothers who were never exposed, and which the children had to base their lives on, is entirely in ruins. Especially in a culture that won't accept the thought of female perpetrators.

We know from a multitude of examinations, that the male perpetrators on average begin their abuse when the child is approximately 4-5 years of age. Actually the culmination is around 7. So, at least the children have worked up some degree of maturity and basic trust before these violations begin. The violations are horrible just the same, but the timing makes a difference.

Women (mom's, aunts, grandmom's etc. etc.) who abuse children sexually are  - on the contrary to most men - rather close to the children in their earlier years, and therefore begin their abuse much earlier. On average while the children are still under the age of 1. Of 1!? This makes the violations much worse, because they are committed in the middle of the building process of 'basic trust'. Where all future trust is supposed to be rooted.

We also know from these women that they commit much more rough violence than their male counterparts, because they tend to think, that this is how raising a child is done. Or this is how love is passed on. So, these women are emotionally quite damaged and has much difficulties with education and keeping jobs etc. etc. But if everything else fails "you can always become a mom". "Then you are something", right?

And it's in this new role of motherhood that these women find out, that they have difficulties on this area as well, and then the frustration are passed on to the children. They become more or less an extension of their own frustration.

The next natural question would probably be: "Do these women go to jail"?

The answer is: "No". Rarely they do. But they are mostly perceived as in need of help, emotionally damaged and let down, and therefore in need of support.

The billion-dollar question would then be: "Why are men not perceived the same way"?
Give me one good reason because I don't know...


On basis of surveys in Canada and America, W.D. Gairdner has in his essay "The war against the family", proved the myth about men's violence against women where women are always victims completely false.

Gairdner is quite frank about his reasons for this essay, and says his primary goal has been to prove how we've gotten brainwashed by man-hating feminists to believe that only men are violent and only women are victims of violence.

These are just SOME of the figures Gairdner refers to:

Violence between men and women:

Calgary University, Interspousal violence.:
562 couples were asked about violence in the family.
38% claimed that there had been violence in the family.

In 80 incidents the violence committed were equally on both sides (both men and women hit each other).
In 58 incidents the violence were primarily directed against the woman (the man hits).
In 75 incidents the violence were primarily directed against the man (the woman hits).

Alberta University, laboratory for population examinations:
708 couples were asked.
Generally the violence commited was equal on both sides of the genders. But in the more harsh incidents the man was the victim in 4,7% of them, whereas the woman was the victim in 2,3% of them,

Murray Straus - US national survey on female victims of violence:
In a survey among 428 female victims of DV the women themselves told they threw the first punch in 52,7 of the incidents whereas the women themselves told their men hit first in 42,6%.

Gryl og Byrd - Survey on dating relationships:
Gryl og Byrd came to the same conclusions in a survey on dating relations.

McLeod - Analysis of 60.000 homes using National crime statistics:
According to McLeods calculations: 1,8 million women and 2,1 million men are victims of DV every year in the US:

Murder - among men and women:
The number of women and men who kill their spouse are equal on both sides according to Steinmetz.
I Canada men are the victims in 65% of the murdercases, whereas women are the victims in 35%.
These numbers are confirmed by figures from Toronto, where in 55 murders in all in 1990 - the women were victims in 16 of these cases. In the period 1980-1989:  640 murders (on average) were spread out on 412 men and 228 women.

Weapons used among men and women.
McLeod has shown that men use weapons in 25% of the very serious cases of violence against women, whereas women use weapons in 82% of the very serious cases.

Violence against children:
Steinmetz has shown that women hit their children in 62% of all cases of violence against children, and that the boys are victims twice as often as girls.

According to Dr Fred Matthews, figures from Toronto has shown, that 7,6% of the boys were violated by women, whereas 16,5% were violated by men.  

New Jerseys Department of Human Services:
Among 54366 reported cases of assault on children, where 36% were confirmed, the victim lived in one-parent-homes (mainly with their mothers) in 67% of the incidents.

The mothers were the perpetrators in 77% of the confirmed cases in one-parent-homes.

"So why is it necessary to gender-polarize violence to be a masculine ability only", Gairdner asks?

And so do I...

Regards Masterpiece
Main / Psykopaths
Apr 02, 2004, 05:48 PM
Recently the issues regarding psychopathic behavior among both successful executives, and not so successful outlaws reemerged in the Danish press. Once again, we could read day in, and day out, about the characteristics and deviations from so called "healthy" and "normal" personalities. In both newspapers and especially womens magazines.

And it made me wonder, how we diagnose psychopathic behavior, without getting biased by gender differences and "normality's"?

I'm tumbling with the idea, that a lot more women than men, gain dispensation from a diagnose, or avoid getting marked as personality disordered if you will. Woman could theoretically blame the most outrageous behaviors on PMS, bad mood, migraine etc. because we normally use manly expressions and "faces" of this behavior, to measure them.

Let me give a hypothetic example:

What is the difference between a rapist who rape a woman without remorse, and a woman reporting assault, or incest, or other kinds of abusive behavior without remorse, to subsequently gain other advantages by doing so? In fights over child custody for an example? I don't see the real differences in outcome and hurt, between getting raped for instance, and being imprisoned or even suspected of these kinds of things?

Would a woman enjoy getting imprisoned and fuc*** in the ass by a 7 foot biker on the grounds of false accusations? I think not. Or even be a suspected and loose their children in the process? I don't think so. I would rather take it in my ass 10 times, than loose any right to see eventual children of mine. Though I hope an outcome like that rarely happens, I frankly don't know whether they do? Do they?

And do these kinds of woman, who are caught in the lie, first and foremost get their heads examined or imprisoned? Because from where I stand, such allegations and their consequences seem pretty psychopathic to me. Maybe it's because I've seen how women's violence is in effect often done through "lobbying" and appealing to some proxies, making it invisible to the naked eye, because the dirty work is usually done by other than themselves.

But do they?


Recently I found this article on If fully describes the tactics used by Mens Movement - i can think of no better fraises myself. AH is right on the money in my opinion. Men communicate on their own frequency, one which women only rarely FULLY understand. This article is rather long, but the link will bring you directly to the essence. The reasson I'm posting it is, that AH's page may seem somewhat confussing to explore. And this is one link, i think deserves the front page.

And this describes the overall differences in the operation of our brains, from a gender perspective.


Main / Manhunters shot down in flight.
Apr 01, 2004, 06:22 PM
But who are these manhunters? They are first and foremost a group of woman (often psychologists), who have made it their specialty to seek out victims of sexual violation among both children and women, with otherwise repressed memories of these violations.

These so called experts, have through many years claimed these violations happened more frequently than the public knew, because they often were kept in secrecy, and that at least every 10th woman, had been subjected to this kind of violation.

A survey among adult women, from 1987, should apparently show, that at least 14% (1 in 7!!!) of these women had been violated as children.

But these were the adult women, and I'll be as forthcoming as can, and claim that most of these women invented excuses for their own feelings of failure, or have been subjected to the kind of programming known among psychologists as "False Memory Syndrome", which flew over the US like a plague in the same period.

But recently the "Danish  Health Institute" did a survey among 6000 pupils in 9 grades (approximately 10% of the pupils in 2002), in the entire country, and asked whether they themselves think they have been violated or not.

Result:  3% of the girls, and 1% of the boys, would themselves say, given the questions asked, they had been sexually violated in some way or another. It should be noted, that I do not know in which way these questions were asked.

The violator were mostly known by the victim, and in 10% of these incidents, the violator were a family member. A "familymember" is not further defined. In 5% of the incidents they were committed by one outside the family.

If we use these figures as a guideline only, approximately 180 girls and 60 boys out of 60.000 youths, themselves believe they have been sexually violated, by not further defined members of their families.

Futhermore, when we use these figures from other surveys, which show approximately 10% of the violations is done by parents, and at the same time assume the amount of youths are more or less equal in these surveys, there are suddenly not that many victims left. Somewhere in the neighbourhood of 18 girls, and 6 boys. As given, they are all approximately 15 years of age, and if we assume that everyone will remember violations down to the age of 4-5, we end up with percentages like 1,8% girls and 0,6% boys have been violated. If we furthermore assume, that the risk of violation spread out evenly, over the entire childhood and youth (which is NOT the case), the following birthyears will also be at risk, with a possibility proportionally lesser in relation to the period of time until the 15th year of age - 9/10th, 8/10th and so on. All figures taken into account, we in Denmark, end up with roughly 11,72 girls and 3,76 boys that are victims of some kind of sexual violation done by parents, out of a population of 6.millions. It should be noted that these figures are the product, of the youths own perception of a "violation", thus clearly showing, as we already knew, that parents are - by far - the best suited for the caring of their own children.

We know from foreign surveys, that approximately 1-2% of all children, have been violated. But surprisingly enough, the Danish counterpart to F4J, and this ONLY, receives crys for help by fathers accused of sexual violations of their children - down to the age of 1 or 2 (!?) in numbers like 12-24 pr. year. Thus clearly showing, that there exist no greater lie than twisted statistics. In this case - making it a virtual crime against humanity to operate with figures in the neighbourhood of 15%, like we see so many help organizations do -  like the "Danish Save the Children" by Vernon Jones for instance, supported by an army of psychologists and "EXPERTS".

If you haven't already done so, I urge you to look further in to similar figures and statistics in the US. I am quite certain, you will find the same suspicious exaggerations all over the place.


Main / One way to be a real man.
Apr 01, 2004, 11:04 AM
A real man understands, that he is a real man, because he is as good at beeing himself, as other real men.

A real man therefore understands, that faking personality or picking up political correct manly characteristics from magazines, that doesn't conform to his own 'self', are both verbal and nonverbal lies, which will in time corrupt his personality, and make him a disoriented pussy.

Hence, a real man will never EVER be dictated how to be a real man by anyone but himself. And a real man will tell anyone, who tries to remodel him in their own picture, to go to the nearest corner and f*** themselves.

If a date insist on picking up the tab, a real man will assume, that he is dating a real woman, who is as good at being herself, as he himself is. Hence, he will assume she means exactly what she says, and assume she wants to pick it up.


The Madonna/Whore-Complex.

There is no one universally used definition of the Madonna/Whore complex. Usually discussions of this complex revolves around the dichotomy of how some men can view women as two distinct and separate persons. That of saint, and that of sinner. That of mother, and that of whore. The complex can also center around the distinction between sacred love and profane love.

As of now, I'm not going further into details surrounding this complex because:

1. Further knowledge of this complex is completely unnecessary in relation to this post, unless you are really interested in the academics on this subject. So I'm going to keep it simple and ease the understanding.

2. My English is a bit rusty, therefore limited, and I really want to spare myself from further entanglement right now...he he he. Year, I'm a lazy dog. ;-)

3. The keyword in the understanding of the Madonna/Whore complex is: "dichotomy". This is really the only thing you need to keep in mind.

I'll just add to this rough description of the complex, that it relates to Sigmund Freud's oedipus complex, which is both described and further theorized in plain English in another thread (Understanding the Gender Subconscious), though I don't use the exact fraise anywhere. But the male psychodynamic theories presented are primarily rooted in the oedipus complex, revolving around the madonna/whore complex, but NOT limited to this phase. So now you know.


I will theorize on a similar complex in girls and woman, though it expresses itself slightly differently. Furthermore, I claim, that the reason Freud never really observed and described similar complex in girls around the 1900th hundred, were due to the social constructions and therefore the general gender pattern at the time, making it virtually invisible in woman, because there were no social framework in place to outlive it. Girls/woman were mostly completely dependant on a male provider at the time, thus woman had greater interests in holding themselves back.

The inspiration for this post came from Assault who wrote the following:

"...This is so very, very true. Every single woman I have been with was with me because of my bad-boy image. They see all the tattoos, piercings and hear other men talk about how I used to be a professional fighter, and they become very intrigued. When they find out I'm a really nice guy, they seem let down.  

I've asked all of them about this and they admit they want the bad boy, but a "good" bad boy who they can change. They set themselves up for a fall every time...

Well...need I say more? Probably not - but I'll do it anyway.

Assault is right on the money! In fact, I don't think I know even ONE guy who wouldn't recognize the dichotomy Assault is referring to. This brings us to:


*I'm completely open to suggestions regarding the name. Let's find a proper name for this complex*

Based on the conclusions reached in my former post, I believe it's safe to lean against two rough stereotypes before I go any further:

1. Woman are in general RECEPTIVE, and measures themselves by the male RESPONSE.
2. Men are primarily PROVIDING, measuring themselves by female INVITATION.

(Not necessarily providing only financially, but also providers of entertainment, sperm, attention, comfort, laughs, fatherhood, excitement etc.)

So, here we go:

There is no one universally used definition of the FamilyMan/BadBoy complex. Usually discussions of this complex revolves around the dichotomy of how some women can view men as two distinct and separate persons. That of saint, and that of sinner. That of family-man, and that of bad-boy The complex can also center around the distinction between sacred love and profane love. This complex reveals itself in a variety of ways:

1. Studies in the female gender have revealed, that females tend to be attracted to wilder and more "rough" kind of males just before, or while, going through ovulation. But during pregnancy and right after giving birth, they tend to be attracted towards softer kind of males. Thus clearly showing that woman seek out genes among the males, that are capable under the rule of the "jungle law", and preferring more stable and softer men, as fathers and providers for them and their children. Hence, the fact that at least 15% of the children in the U.S. do not have the father, they themselves think they have - makes perfect sense!

(The correct figure in Denmark is approximately 6%, but US citizens also seem ahead of time on almost every level compared to Europe. Or any other country for that matter. Hence, I expect a rise in this percentage in Denmark in the near future ;-)  )

2. Woman often seem to prefer male friends over female when given a choice. This observation is solely based on my own experiences. But I've noticed that they only friend up with males, who are in no way capable of turning them on. Hence, only those males that CANNOT threaten them with awakening any desire in them, become friends. The reason for this, I believe is due to these kind of males emotional openness. If my observations are correct, is it then safe to assume, that males with human emotions simply disappoint a lot of females, because it implies as much providing and responsibility for those feelings, as it implies reception. In other words; theoretically only 50% reception! Assuming this is correct, are females then seeking the best qualities from two worlds?

"Soft male friends and stable fathers in the day, and a rough biker or psycho at night"?

3. A lot of woman fantasize about some "mystery man" raping them, though in reality fearing such incidents. I will let this one speak for itself.

Remember guys; the cueword is "dichotomy"!


Main / Understanding the gender subconscious
Mar 31, 2004, 11:03 AM
*Every theory presented in this post is fully compatible with basic, conventional and generally accepted theories in the psychological development process among children. This post is simply transforming the academics into plain words, and suggesting further explanations, still conforming to those theories.*

In my opinion, men can only rarely - maybe never - achieve the feeling of complete intimacy with woman they do not have intercourse with. This is where Mother Nature really screwed the male gender. Both hormonally and psychologically. Because if I'm right, us men, HAVE to penetrate woman physically, in order to achieve FULL psychological awareness of the feelings we have for woman, and to enjoy the full extend of both physical and psychological symbiosis. If we dare give into it, that is.

The rest of the time in between intercourses, I claim, that males tend to forget what they felt quicker than woman. And woman, on the other hand, tend to remember the feeling of complete intimacy for longer periods of time. On top, I believe we are psychologically predispositioned for the lack of words to explain ourselves, and how our emotional pathways work. Compared to woman that is. Hence, we get interpreted as more obsessive about penetration (and ONLY that), than fair.

The reason for my claim is as follows:

Any child will immediately after birth begin to identify with its primary source of satisfaction, namely its mother. The newborn child perceives itself as both omnipotent, and still un-seperated from its mother. Or put into other words, it strives to maintain the illusion of physical symbiosis, because it is psychologically too immature to fully comprehend its own separation and identity. Hence, any child can only recognize its own individuality, when it has matured to being fully aware of the physical separation, finally resulting in a foundation for the building process of its own identity.

But boys separation process possess an extra dimension compared to girls', because apart from the awareness of individuality through the separation process, we have to go through an un-identifying process with our mothers, and the female gender, in order to RE-identify with our fathers and the male gender.

And this un-and-re-identifying-process is simply inevitable, because it will initialize as soon as boys visually realize, that dad has the "dick and a set of balls", and mom has "a set of tits and a vagina". Therefore driving the boys into attempts to overtake their fathers place. In effect; both make them compete with their fathers status in general, but also identify with their characteristics. Obviously, if dad has something mom loves, boys will strive to get it, and try to get rid of the competition.

And luckily, no ordinary child will be fooled into thinking these differences MAKES no difference, because they most certainly DO. Not only due to hormonally differences, but certainly also due to the differences in the gender subconscious constructions.

Hence, boys are biologically predispositioned for a more psychologically rigid separation process, which will, theoretically, put them in an eternal state of longing after symbiotic reconnection with the female gender. Hence, our own mothers have implemented an invisible "force" in us, which will make sure their boys seek symbiotic reconnection with other females, sort of speak. First, and foremost, we will seek the physical reconnection through intercourse (with a little help from testosterone), and on the subconscious level, seek the mentally symbiosis, which we can only TRUELY give into, when the physical symbiosis support it. This would also explain why we often tend to fall in love with woman, both physical and psychologically similar to our own mothers (yaks...I think).

And it would also, to some extend, explain why male serial killers (that kills woman) has more than often experienced unsuccessful childhood separation attempts, from their own dominating mothers - in effect leaving them in an eternal fear of separation, which in time will make them go insane, If confronted negatively enough with the social code and definition of "maleness" and "male independency" . I will dig further into the details surrounding this 'symbiosis-trap' of insanity in another post.

"But what about the girls", you might ask. Or at least - you ought to ask ;-)

Well...woman probably won't accept this explanation too easily, but this is where the penis-envy comes into the picture. When I say "penis envy" it is not really meant the way most might think.  Girls simply observe how boys and their own fathers either turn their biggest weakness (their greater longing after symbiotic reconnection) into their greatest strength, (their greater strive to achieve independency from that lust), or watch them fail in the process. And I claim, this envy is the reason why woman gets attracted towards men, who have reached their full potential of independency. Therefore men in general have to be successful, independent providers, ruling themselves, because this is exactly what woman both envies, and get attracted to. This level of independency is much harder for woman to achieve, because they lack the subconscious motives to drive it.

So woman want what they do not already possess themselves. And so do males, but both genders are driven by entirely different motives. But by possessing a successful, independent male with her libido, the female can convince herself of her own worth. In effect; woman tend to reduce men to a mere RESPONSE to themselves, and men tend to reduce woman to mere SEX, though both of these simple explanations are not completely correct, because they completely lack the understanding of the subconscious motives.
Because of the greater longing after symbiotic reconnection in males (due to the seemingly long forgotten un-identification process) woman has a firm grip on males. And, on the other hand, males have a firm grip on females, because they are much more motivated to strive for TRUE independacy (which is not independacy through dependency on welfare) in effect forcing males to exploit their full potential, under pressure. They have to EARN females, trough "buying" them with their greater potential, which is initially their weakness. This will also explain why females have the potential to absorb the male gender identity, in effect leaving the males in a fear of mental castration, which is much more likely, if they haven't gone successfully through the separation process from their mothers, which is consolidated with the re-identification with other males. First, and foremost, their fathers. This is also the explanation to why the males are much more motivated to either let themselves absorb by woman (making them "weaklings" because they seek symbiotic reconnection too desperatly) or break the woman down, if they take up too much space in the male subconscious. This negative consequence is further strengthened by the testosterone in males, obviously, making us more aggressive by nature.

But...WHY? Why would Mother Nature ever wish to pre-disposition us with a gender psychology ?

I can come up with only one, simple, answer to that question. The males are 'icebreakers'. They are simply put on earth to invent, innovate and clear the road for woman. You will generally notice, that woman consume and administrate what males invent, forcing the males to invent new inventions. Males are constructed in such a way, that they must evolve through conflict, because the male psychology is so very rigid. This is also why males hwage wars, because in wartime the defendant will strive to invent better defences, against an aggressive attacker, who is out to gain ground on behalf of the females.

And this is why we currently wage genderwar in my opinion. Because the alpha-males (At the top of our societys) has eliminated the use of beta-males (The middle or bottom at our societies). Therefore, we not only fight feminism, but also the males that put it into place.

Professor John Archer is a psychologist at the University of Central Lancashire. In 1987 (1987!) he compared 83 surveys on domestic violence, and made a large meta-analysis of them all. In a meta-analysis, you count all the single results, from several different surveys, on the same subject, into one main result. So that those surveys, that count more people, also carries proportionally greater weight in the end result, measured in percent, while those surveys that count lesser people, carries lesser weight.

A meta-analysis should therefore be better able to prevent coincidences, and rule out statistical anomalies, and provide the best answer to the question; "which gender is more domestically violent?"

Most of these surveys has been done in U.S. (in all: 72 of them), while the rest is done in Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand. The conclusion is, not unexpected, that it is women, who more often ignite the domestic violence.

Because of the many surveys, which is put together in one large, the result is statistically significant, as it is virtually impossible that the conclusion is reached by coincidence, or because it is a male who have put these 83 surveys into one meta-analysis.

The most interesting thing about it is, that the female overweight in domestic violence, only shows themselves in the qualitative surveys, which counts every kind of violence - therefore also counting relatively harmless pushes and strokes.

A typical example of this difference in physical "damage" done, is shown by the following overview of violent behavior, among 562 couples in 1987.

In the past year I have:

Threatened with violence, or thrown objects against:
Man against Woman: 10.5% - one time. 6.8 % - several times
Woman against Man: 8.9% - one time. 10.8% - several times

Pushed, grabbed or pulled my partner:
Man against Woman: 9.8% - one time. 5.2% - several times.
Woman against Man: 7.8% - one time. 6.2% - several times.

Hit with the flat hand:
Man against Woman: 4.1% - one time. 1.8% - several times.
Woman against Man: 5.2% - one time. 2.6% - several times..

Kicked, bit or hit with a fist:
Man against Woman: 2.1% - one time. 1.1% - several times.
Woman against Man: 3.7% - one time. 2.7% - several times.

Punched my partner, to the extend of "blue marks" appearing:
Man against Woman: 5.7% - one time. 3.1% - several times.
Woman against Man: 7.5% - one time. 6.5% - several times.

Beat up my partner thoroughly, to the extend that medical care was required:
Man against Woman: 1. 7% - answered yes.
Woman against Man: 1.8% - answered yes.

Threaten with knife or gun:
Man against Woman: 0. 6 % - answered yes.
Woman against Man: 1. 3% - answered yes.

Actually used knife or gun:
Man against Woman: Nobody answered yes.
Woman against Man: 1 answered yes.

*Source: Merlin Brinkerhoff & Eugene Lupri, 1987.*

So, the survey tells us something about woman being pretty good at domestic humiliation. But if only those surveys, that counts incidents of domestic violence, which directly imposed physical damage, is taken into account, then, as expected, the men comes out on top every time.
1. "You must always take a female accusation seriously".

2. "Woman are more capable than men, we only recently found out, because males have kept woman suppressed for thousands of years."

This is just a little outtake of the of the feminazi-victim-culture soundtrack, which has been playing for ages. Especially when we talk about both rape accusations, and accusations of male, domestic violence, woman spins the same, repetitive bulls***. Because it IS Bull'. And here is a good, sound, logical explanation why. One that even a feminazi will understand:

The key to understanding the common motives behind false accusations of rape and dv, in my opinion, lies in the above 2 repeated statements, replayed by all feminists, all over the Western hemisphere, over and over again. They will either brainwash you into believing, that woman really ARE both humanly and morally superior to men, though "sold to us" as an attempt to implement mental equality, in our collective patriarchal  thinking. Or at least keep most male rebel-mouths tightly shut, when they think otherwise.

You must remember; woman are impersonators of innocent superiority. Due to both their "cute" and weak physics, and their talent for mass-communicating (in effect: bitching) and repeating newspeak (in effect: political correct lies). Hence, woman have created a new set of "truths", regularly repeated, and further indoctrinated by the free feminized press, which tend to expose every reported accusation of rape for instance, and similar possesses a quite suspicious tendency, to hide exposed false accusations from the public. The news media holds an all too trusted information authority. It has turned more and more into a "ministry of truth" propaganda machine, from where I stand. The problem is: it still works, even when knowing how it operates, because everybody believes the neighbor is too stupid to realize the same, hence, those who does, fight it!

Let me draw a little analogy here; most people knows TV-shop right? If you know how TV-shop operates, you will have noticed, that they will repeat the same commercial, at least three times in a row, because studies in subliminal programming have shown, that new knowledge tend to stay more tightly imprinted in your long term memory, than it would otherwise do, when run on you only once. This is what woman, and especially feminazis does; they replay the subliminal programming of their surroundings, by speaking their 'newspeak' repeatedly. (When they don't go around, reducing men to "reactions" to their own sexuality, that is). In effect, speking a "false reality" into reality!?  

To fully answer the how's and why's, we must understand the feminazi use of twisted semantics. Semantics is the academic term for "studies on the meaning of words". And words can be expanded for further containment. For instance, a feminazi psychosis could easily regard sexual harassment, as an attempted rape, just by expanding the meaning of the word "pawing". You see? This may seem as a bit exaggerated example to some people, when put in to plain words, but in reality it is not. Not in Denmark anyway. The side effect is, that when more woman expand their perception of rape, or violence etc. to cover more innocent situations, then, of course, the statistics will seem worse, because they are expanded to 'newspeak' the new meanings of rape and violence, further into our social construction of society, and further demonize men. This is logic.  

And here is the neat trick. More so called "hidden figures" will rise in the statistics, because suddenly we can find a LOT of woman, who previously wouldn't report rape or violence two years ago, when they were "raped and beat up by their boyfriends", because when rape and dv is spoken into focus, it will create more room for abuse by the attention-holics.

"But why would woman ever want to be victims of rape", you might ask. Simple:

To understand this last part of false accusations in general, we have to understand, that sentence number 2, in top of this message, has been repeated similarly often. Both by woman themselves, and by the free press, because both expressions contradicts themselves, under the rule of junglelaw. This will roughly have a two-way-effect.

1. A lot of woman needs dramatic excuses, for falling back into their preferred role as attention-needing, innocent little girls, in a time, where they are supposed to be made of independent iron. Most WANT to be cared for by "super dad", but nowadays they need excuses. Especially for being weaklings ALL the time, which is also why the feminazis in Denmark invented "work induced Trauma" instead of "Depression" for instance. (Some receive financial compensation for work induced loss of mentally good health in Denmark). You see the trick? There is a tendency in woman to invent crisis, and disorders around themselves, in order to fall back in the role of victims, and into some super dads saving arms. But you can not be a victim, without a stereotype attacker. In this way, they will go to great lengths, to force and HOLD the male nature in a role of "responsibility" in one way or the other.

Hence, it would seem, that false accusations of this-and-that, is about to take the place of an even older instrument of the same motive, namely attempted suicide, that is meant to fail, in order to gain some attention and getting some help. Usually suicidal tendencies, is really rooted in too much pride to express needs. I therefore foresee an increase in those kinds of motives behind false accusations, because woman generally lives an emotional vacuum, in relation to what they REALLY wish they had, and on the other hand, couldn't care less about the providing gender.

2. The second, and luckily much more seldom, in Denmark anyway, is the consequences of engaging the "gold Digger". The one that will report rape, or violent behavior, in order to gain compensation (either in terms of gaining child custody, by demonizing the father, or financial compensation some way or another). There is only one way, to get rid of types like that, and that is by deconstructing the false reality, of feminine moral superiority, by exposing their manipulation and putting the most common 'tricks' into words. Explanations just makes life easier!