Messages

1

Main / Re: Why don't environmentalists bitch about estrogen pollution?

Dec 07, 2007, 10:37 AM

There is a written rule about advertising, 'do not offend your target market'.   

Women are almost always the target market, except for things like video games, beer, football.  That's about it.

So basically they have no one to offend or rather pick on to create a 'group' mindset then men.  It is probably the basic and simplist form of advertising manipulation.

A good example is those areo commercials.  Two women eating a chocolate bar "sharing" a moment and some guy walks up and says or trys to communicate with the women and they 'belittle' him.   

Now why is he a dork?  He is a undesirable dork because chocolate makes you gain weight and become unattractive.  Having a healthy stud confident and desirable will actually kill the message of "eat this chocolate".

It's ditto with beer commercials.  Labatts? had a commercial with two girls kissing in order to try lip stick.  There were three guys standing there with their jaws on the floor.  Why?  Was the commercial there to demean women?  Was it to promote male sexuality?  To feed men's ego?  NOT ONE BIT.  It was a directive.  It was to specifically dysfunctionalize male ego.  It was to make men bumbling incompetent boobs around women which leads them to believe they need liquid courage to talk to women.  It further creates a barreir between men and women in order to seel more product.  Because, my guess is, partnered relationships actually drink less beer.

Advertisers never want us to grow up.

2

Main / Re: Aussie politician on family law

Dec 05, 2007, 09:43 PM

IT's old news, but it's nice to see someone did a video on it.  Which is what everyone on this board s hould be doing.  Post videos on utube and myspace and pas them around.

I thought this one was cool.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5300142475723291102&q=Brainwashing&total=1101&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3

3

Main / Re: Why don't environmentalists bitch about estrogen pollution?

Dec 05, 2007, 09:22 PM

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5300142475723291102&q=Brainwashing&total=1101&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3

Check this out, and forty years old.

4

Main / Why don't environmentalists bitch about estrogen pollution?

Dec 04, 2007, 01:08 PM

Just wondering?

5

Main / Re: Cops can track your cell phone's GPS

Dec 04, 2007, 01:05 PM

I use a 5 year old Nokia, so I'm in the clear.

Same deal here.

But, my question remains.  Should the police be legally allowed to track you?

There was a missing person report the other night around here.  The girl was missing past midnight.  Well, I should say 21 year old woman, who is supposedly responsible for herself.  She was home by 5 am.  Nothing was wrong with her and by all accounts that means she was missing for about 5 hrs, but, not with a curfew or anything.  She should have just called home.  Her aunt apparently called the cops and the cops jumped.  They tracked down the person she was with using a cell phone number.  There was nothing wrong with her, she was in no danger, and she was excercising her right as an adult.

Ironically, when the police approached the person who she was last seen with, using the cell phone gps, the missing girl was already at home.

So if an accusation of any sort goes out,  like an assault, theft, etc... are the police allowed to use gps to track someone down by law?  Is this something that  people on this board think is okay?  Is it a violation of our constitution?  I already know that answer, but, like the constitution has any value anymore.

Welcome to the fuedal state boys.

6

Main / Re: Cops can track your cell phone's GPS

Dec 04, 2007, 10:36 AM

Ya, but the question is, should the police be allowed to use that information to track you for anything?  The public hasn't fully agreed to it, nor are they even aware of it.  It's also a good way to dispose of political dissidents.  Just follow them then shoot them.   Shouldn't everyone have access to this information, why only the cops?  And in reality, don't we all have power of policing?  If not, shouldn't we?

7

Main / Cops can track your cell phone's GPS

Dec 04, 2007, 01:01 AM

This is something that should come up before officials and the public.  The police are able to track people through their Cell Phone GPS.  All the police need is a phone number and the GPS signal in the phone does the rest.

Is this something that should be allowed?  Is this an invasion of privacy?

These secrets and more.  Such as the NSA (National Security Association), which is bigger than the FBI and the CIA combined has been listening to you for decades. 

8

Main / Re: White Male City Councilman Stands Up To Prejudice Against White Males

Nov 29, 2007, 02:36 PM

Oh my god The Orwellian thought police are at large.

Because even in the end, when the two guys agreed the upshot is, eveyone must censor themselves.

I find it sadly ironic that the video totally creates the Nazi party.  Two white males from the blue collar class.   ie  the Nationalist Socialist Germans Workers Party. 

I'm telling you, those people who created the videos are Nazi's for real.

9

Main / Propaganda Campaign to rob you of your rights.

Nov 29, 2007, 02:24 PM

This is something floating around facebook.  I have recieved like 12 times.  But this is typical of the current hysteria propaganda campaign I am seeing at least in Ontario through billboards, radio and other media. 

"This is so sad.



My name is Chris

I am three,

My eyes are swollen

I cannot see,

I must be stupid

I must be bad,

What else could have made

My daddy so mad?

I wish I were better

I wish I weren't ugly,

Then maybe my mommy

Would still want to hug me.

I can't do a wrong

I can't speak at all

Or else im locked up

All day long.

When im awake im all alone

The house is dark

My folks aren't home

When my mommy does come home

I'll try and be nice,

So maybe i'll just get

One whipping tonight.

I just heard a car

My daddy is back

From Charlie's bar.

I hear him curse

My name is called

I press myself

Against the wall

I try to hide

From his evil eyes

I'm so afraid now

I'm starting to cry

He finds me weeping

Calls me ugly words,

He says its my fault

He suffers at work.

He slaps and hits me

And yells at me more,

I finally get free

And run to the door

He's already locked it

And i start to bawl,

He takes me and throws me

Against the hard wall

I fall to the floor

With my bones nearly broken,

And my daddy continues

With more bad words spoken,

"I'm sorry!", I scream

But its now much to late

His face has been twisted

Into a unimaginable shape

The hurt and the pain

Again and again

O please God, have mercy!

O please let it end!

And he finally stops

And heads for the door

While i lay there motionless

Brawled on the floor

My name is chris

I am three,

Tonight my daddy

Murdered me

And you can help

Sickens me top the soul,

And if you read this

and don't pass it on

I pray for your forgiveness

Because you would have to be

One heartless person

To not be effected

By this Poem

And because you are effected,

Do something about it!

So all I ask you to do

Is pass this on!

IF YOU ARE AGAINST CHILD ABUSE"


My belief is that it creates suspicion everywhere.  People will be hyper sensitive to it.  The courts will glut with accusations and  children's services will be busier then ever.   Now these are the same children's services that took children based on the fact that there was a 'lock' on a certain door in the house.  And in another case, under the same agency they took a child because there was 'no lock' on the same type of door in a house. 

10

Main / Re: Holy Bat, Sh!tman...I mean...

Nov 23, 2007, 02:14 PM

Hmmm...
SO, in the US-
Who's DEMANDING "universal childrens health care", first for "the poorchildren ", then for "those woman and children falling through the cracks", next "for college students", and the final joke-"the finest quality of health care for ALL citizens with mandatory participation by everyone"?

Who's touting and promising it in expectation of "votes" to power?
When "the norm" has been established as the same expectations Canadians and
Mexicans hold for "health care"-then the job is done I suppose.

I use health care (and "wellness") as it's easier to watch happening in front of our faces.
"No fault" divorce" is a womans law. Strangely it seperates authoritarian fathers from the family equation. WIC (Women, Infants, and Children)
Manditory pre-school, kindergarten, title IX, etc. - Yep, "The State" as the authoritarian.
Harsher arrest, proscecution, conviction, sentancing, parole conditions, etc. for men only
are blimding folks such as myself to demand that  the same "equal" treatment for women is the answer, rather than the ABRUPT elimination of the tools used by those responsible for the slow boil of micromanagement and instillation of governance by FEAR of whims the self-annointed ones.

On a side note, National Ammunition day in the United States  was Monday, the 19th of November. Black Friday, TODAY, (the friday following the US Thanksgiving holiday) offers
thinly veiled "bargins" on inventory that merchants of unneeded crap need to (hopefully) sell to make room for higher priced "must have" items for Christmastime gift giving.
I suspect one can get Chinese manufactured sythes. grass whips, pick axe handles, pitch forks, hay rakes, spades etc. for a reduced rate. None require an endless supply of bateries, extension cords, or petrolium to operate.
How much agriculture one decides to practice in a paved over  urban setting is a matter of personal choice, just be sure to INSTINCTIVELY know the difference between the sprouting bounty, invasive species,  and the  choking weeds that do nothing but  consume precious resources.   

Ask yourself who benifits?  You basically have satan whispering in women's ears promising to take all her woes away if she just signs on the doted line.  Don't you think that same greedy piece of shit will eventually turn on her first chance he gets?  Or in this case "it".

11

Main / Re: Holy Bat, Sh!tman...I mean...

Nov 23, 2007, 12:59 AM

The alternative is the status quo which means men get shit on. Typically when women are hurt, actions are taken to correct the situation. So I hope more women get what they demand which is to be treated exactly like men.

I agree, they should be treated equally under the law.  My concern is the constant eradication of our individual rights.   First they take away rights from men, then slowly, when nobodies looking strip them from women.  That's where I call feminism an equality movement.   It's like this.  First they take away men's rights to their children.  Soon, they will take away women's rights to their children.  Hence, feminism truley is an equality movement.   

12

Main / Re: Happy Thanksgiving

Nov 22, 2007, 03:14 PM

Happy Thanksgiving my American friends. 

I second that.

13

Main / Re: Holy Bat, Sh!tman...I mean...

Nov 22, 2007, 03:13 PM

Nope they didn't call it what it is,  child molestation, but they did at least call it statutory rape in the article. I have noticed that the MSM usualy tries to minimize it by calling it sexual assault, or an "inapropriate relationship".

Calling it a statutory rape is at least closer to the truth.

Baby steps maybe but things are getting better.

"Getting better"?  That is their plan all along.  They want to criminalize women in the exact same way and they are doing their best to move it forward.  It has nothing to do with the media, it has to do with the population consensus.  What the media is trying to do is push it along step by step but it has to be sensitive to the majority, and especially women.  Otherwise why would they even publish it in the first place?

Matter of perspective.

AS soon as people start looking at the "justice system" as a business with stock holders, share holders and a self proclaimed mandate to increase profits, demographics and market penetration then we will then all realize that it is all a scam.  And one of its fundemental priorities is to divide and conquer us so "it" as an entity can strip us of our individual rights, both men and women, to get richer.  Which is exactly why I see it sadly ironic that MRA's actually cheer when they see women stripped of their individual and supposedly inalienable rights.  I agree it's not fair to see women get away with what they have been getting away with but this tit for tat game will not restore our rights it will only annihalate them.

14

Main / Re: Holy Bat, Sh!tman...I mean...

Nov 21, 2007, 03:33 PM

Nope they didn't call it what it is,  child molestation, but they did at least call it statutory rape in the article. I have noticed that the MSM usualy tries to minimize it by calling it sexual assault, or an "inapropriate relationship".

Calling it a statutory rape is at least closer to the truth.

Baby steps maybe but things are getting better.

"Getting better"?  That is their plan all along.  They want to criminalize women in the exact same way and they are doing their best to move it forward.  It has nothing to do with the media, it has to do with the population consensus.  What the media is trying to do is push it along step by step but it has to be sensitive to the majority, and especially women.  Otherwise why would they even publish it in the first place?

15

Main / Re: What If Everything You Thought You Knew About AIDS Was Wrong?

Nov 19, 2007, 07:14 PM

Some more copy-pastes of articles.  Ok.

I'm curious, D.  What is your standard of evidence?  How do you decide what is true and what is not?  Hypothetically speaking, what finding in the real world would lead you to accept that AIDS results from drug side-effects, and what finding in the real world would lead you to accept that AIDS results from HIV infection?

I would like to see the research done that was proposed by duesberg, the perth group and a few others.   To start.