This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The same logic could say they are inferior.
Men have a much higher curve then women do on an IQ scale, many more male genius's and many more idiots.
Not very logical to say men are intellectually superior as a whole, logical to say that a small minority of men outperform everyone else on the planet.
Chris, you are acting like a pompus jerk. This IS a forum about men's rights, and if you are so disappointed with it WHY ARE YOU HERE?
There are moderation rules, which do not hinder the speech of most MRAs in the least who have a modicum of intelligence and self control,
People like Chris are part of the reason it is sometimes hard to call myself an MRA.
Hmm I never really looked at it that way. Thanks for the opinion. Not sure if I agree or even... disagree. But a good point for my gray matter to knaw on for a while.
Look, I'll explain it even further, when a femikook searches the internet to support their claim that all MRAs are sexist pigs and hate women, your site can and will come up.
You mean ebephile.
Pederast refers specifically to the practice of older men having sexual relationships with younger men (who are also their pupils). Refer to the word Pedagogy, which means philosophy of teaching.
Pedophile refers to a person who has a sexual attraction to someone who is pre-pubescent.
Quote from: "Gerard Velthuis"
well that's not all rue. In many lists, especially recent lists, he is not number 1 or more often he is not even in the top 10 list anymore.
That's true. In polls of younger girls I've heard him described as an old man or past it.
Secondly I could very easily go to a place like the "Niceguy" forum" and pull qoutes from men who identify themselves as MRA's that would also make any sane persons blood curdle.
I think it's worth noting that no one questions her conclusions, they just "oh and ah" about how interesting it is. Yes it is interesting but think about this, how many people would "oh and ah" if it was a man fooling women in the same ruse? I don't think so. Criticisims would be flying about how he was unscrupulous and a liar in order to gain the trust of women and enter their personal space. People would be saying how he was still a man and unable to TRULY experience what it is like to be a woman and would likely void his observations as a result. He might even be accused of being a quasi-rapist since he penetrated their trust and personal space without their consent. "What kind of man would do something like that" would be a question that would be heard across the land and on amazon reviews. Contrast that with the reception she is getting.
They are also almost all white.