Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Conspiracy Theory

Main / Ensure consent for sex, men told
Mar 07, 2006, 04:05 PM
Am I the only one that sees this type of propaganda as a form of 'population control' aka marxism?

They are actually takeing away women's rights.

Remember what margaret sanger tried to do,  nothing has changed.  

The trend is for 'de-population' and that's why this is happening.  

I say,  refuse to comply.  if a woman kisses you back, that's consent.

Also, for those interested,  so far in Canadain law "Consent" has yet to be a defense.  So what I'm saying is, if a man pleads not guilty because she 'consented' to sex at the time and for whatever reason claimed it was rape the man will be found guilty.     Consent is not a successful defense even if true.
Main / Goodbye Feminism
Aug 22, 2005, 02:50 PM
Quote from: "devia"
I'm a feminist and I think that women should worship the ground men walk on as part of their activism.

When "men" stop looking like 12 year old boys then we can discuss the issue. Untill then frankly it's kind of ikky.

Are these personal attacks , Devia?

Main / Goodbye Feminism
Aug 22, 2005, 12:07 PM
I'm a feminist and I think that women should worship the ground men walk on as part of their activism.
Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 22, 2005, 11:55 AM
Quote from: "devia"
That picture is between 14 and 16 right?

Why, you like em  young?
Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 22, 2005, 11:54 AM
Quote from: "Julian"
A typical feminine feminist:

and her profile.

To be honest with you, I don't even know what a mysoginist is.  It's like all of a sudden everyone was labled a mysoginist.

I'm thinking it was a crafty form of censorship.  For example:

Let's say you questioned some of the thinking of the Nazi party.  One of their techniques to silence nesayers was to shout "You're anti-German@!", and nobody wanted to be thought of as 'anti-german, or anti-germany'.  Similiar to the current patriotic frenzy we have now with the republicans and questions about 911, "Un American" or whatever.

But with the clear cut "symbiotic relationship" that men and women have they can fill these women's head with propaganda to spout stats, research and a list of other concepts all boded with a defense mechanism for perpetuation.  For example:

Woman: "There is a wage gap".

Man:  "There is no wage gap".

Woman: "You just say that because you're a mysoginist".

Man: "NO, I'm not a mysoginist, I love women."

Usually the end of the debate right there.
Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 22, 2005, 11:43 AM
Quote from: "Sir Jessy of Anti"
I have a type:  non-feminist.

Please, links and pictures dam it!

Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 22, 2005, 10:20 AM
Please provide links or picture.

Who is this Miller chick?
Well, when it was just property owners voting, women had their names on 13% of the votes.

How is it that if they couldn't vote, their names were on 13% of the votes?

I even went to the Canadian official website about voting history.  There is absolutely no date set when all men could vote.

They have a few diatribes about "priviliged" people, then they go on about other races, then women, but nothing that says all men could vote on this date or that.
Main / Goodbye Feminism
Aug 22, 2005, 10:14 AM
Actually most of them have government funded buildings to go to, where they have seminars, lectures and guests from all over.  Or, they go in teams to Judges, police stations, lawyers, schools (all grade  groups) and tell their story.  

Go to any school in Hamilton right now, and if there is any class talking about violence in dating I guarentee you that 100% of it is about male on female.

Eventually every student hears it.  All government funded and sanctioned.

So.... who needs the internet?
Main / Sisters are in it just for themselves
Aug 22, 2005, 01:06 AM

You are already seeing the adverse effects of this unwillingness to change to a more accepting and diverse view.

This is classic.

Grammerically speaking is it even possible for this to be a sentence?  It's like a giant oxymoron,  a double negative or something.
Main / Goodbye Feminism
Aug 21, 2005, 11:45 PM
Quote from: "Russ2d"
It makes sense Conspiracy but we need to move into the avenue of naming names now.

Who exactly is pushing these agendas? ... I agree as you that there are wealthy industrialists pulling the big strings and then there are smaller groups like feminism pushing their own agendas and altogether they move in a similar direction.

Who alive are the big players? We need to make a big enemy/ally list

Lot's of people are out there naming names.  My suggestion is to look at the roster list of the UN and go from there.

It's always the same.  Environmentalism = more control over the environment for the elite.  

The new "Ocean laws" or whatever it's called which is stated to have more protection from pirates at sea.  A def. noteworthy subject, but in the end it's the same elite group trying to gain control.  

Granted, environmentalism is probably important, but the hilerity of it all is that the people who finance it are the same people who do most of the damage.  

Feminism is just a way to control culture, population, the family and so on.

All these things are splinters of the same big globalist plot of world government.   Personally I don't have a problem with globalism or world government,  however, I do have a problem with who currently is trying to get it, and what it is they are trying to achieve.  

It's no coincidence that communism seeks to have a single central bank.

Now maybe it is true that Marx and Engels were on the up and up, and that international bankers looked and the philosophies and decided 'hey this will work for us'.  Thus handing the world over to them as an 'asset'.  Which it pretty much is.

Feminism is a Weapon of Mass Destruction in places like Africa.  Who promotes it there 'the 'IMF'.

You start following these people and you start coming across the same names over and over again.  

Morgan and Chase.  Rockefeller, Rothschild etc...

The world really does become a small place after a while.

To them communism is just state controlled monopoly.  

As for the 'small feminist groups'.  They have absolutely no voice.  Unless they come up with an idea that coincides with the overall plan, their voice is shut down.  They recieve no burseries or media of any kind.  

For example, say there was a woman's movement to promote inalienable rights to having children.  It will not fly, because the movement is for depopulation.  Especially in places where feminism is used as a weapon for war.  Abortions are killing more offspring than soldeirs ever could,  all legal, and all lauded as a contribution to society.  Meanwhile insidiously they are wiping them out with extreme prejuduce.  Or is that 'without prejduce'?

Either way they've used reverse psychology to have the population clammering to extinct themselves.  On the surface it reads as women's rights, but underneath it's annihalation.  It's a means of war, a weapon, a tank, bio-warfare, psychological warfare, whatever comparison you need to see that it's a weapon used to divide and conquer an entire nation.

The girls from here are going there thinking they are giving these women "help".  They are in fact killing them.  Using these missionaries as a spreadable virus.  A psycho political virus.  It's genocide.  

See Margaret Sanger:

"The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

"Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race."
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

"We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don't want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
Margaret Sanger's December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon's Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

"Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need ... We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock."
Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

"Eugenics is ... the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.
Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

"Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives."
[no source available at this time...]

As an advocate of birth control I wish ... to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit,' admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation....
On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.
Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

"The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics."
Margaret Sanger. "The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda." Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

"Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying ... demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism ... [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant ... We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all."
Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on "The Cruelty of Charity," pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.

"The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind."
Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. "Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?" Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

"The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped."
Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.

"The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order..."
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

"[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children..."
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

"Give dysgenic groups [people with 'bad genes'] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization."
Margaret Sanger, April 1932 Birth Control Review.
Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 21, 2005, 10:41 PM
Quote from: "TestSubject"
You know, the harder I try to think of one, the more I draw a blank.  I just don't have a "type" I'm particularly partial to.  I'm not sure why.  I feel kinda apathetic about it really.  I don't care enough to have a "dream girl" or at least a dream type of girl.

I guess that's why I'm single.

I'm off to bed now.  This thread has made me sad.   :(

Aren't you the guy that likes "small curvy ass"?
Main / Goodbye Feminism
Aug 21, 2005, 10:39 PM
Political Correctness actually is a soviet term.  It was used to silence people more than protect them.

For example with hate speech laws today.

If a board like this speaks out against 'Feminism', than we are blasted for our alleged anti-social behavior against women aka hate speech.  But if in reality, feminism doesn't really speak for all women, and is really just a masked form of marxism than we are really speaking out against marxism, but are uniquely being silenced through hate speech laws.

Let's say we have a grievance against 'equiatable worth pay' laws.  Which is fundementally a socialist concept.  It's obvious that feminism is being used to slip this into place with their 'wage gap' conspiracy.  Is it hate speech or is it opposition to a failed socialist concept which is trying to back door itself into law through gender differences and is silencing opposition with 'hate speech laws'?

Pretty crafty huh?

By the way, did my mumble jumble make sense?  I'm kind of tired and....
Main / Which Type is your Type?
Aug 21, 2005, 10:33 PM
Quote from: "Russ2d"
Those are good choices Conspiracy- have you seen Lost in Translation yet? Scarlett's lips are amazing.

I really liked Jennifer Connelly during her Career Opportunity days- she's way too skinny for me now. Hollywood killed her


Yah, I always thought Connelly was cute.  I love the whole blue eyes dark hair thing.  

I also happen to like skinny chicks, typically a french look.  But I thought Scarlett was rather nice in 'A Love Song for Bobby Long' as well.  She was perticularily hot in 'The Island'.  I guess she wanted to go topless but wasn't allowed.  More patriarchial oppression I guess.   :wink:

Feel free to post links to some pics.  The chicks don't have to be famous either.  They could be the chick that works are your coffee shop.  

My point of this thread is that there is no 'stereotype' girl men go for.  I think.  It's not always the pam anderson that guys go for.  

I could be wrong though and maybe this thread will prove that too.
Come on, it's an honest mistake.

I mean feminism has basically been a parody of itself for quite sometime now.