Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Lothar

1
Quote
What if it was “a woman’s world”? What if women made ALL the decisions? If men were their obedient subjects?

These questions and more will be explored when a group of strong, educated, independent women, tired of living in a man’s world and each with a personal axe to grind, rule over a group of unsuspecting men used to calling the shots on WHEN WOMEN RULE THE WORLD.

The unscripted series will reveal how women and men react in a world where women are in charge and men are subservient, and each gender’s ability to adapt to a new social order will be put to the test.

The participants will be brought to a remote, primitive location where the women will have the opportunity to “rule” as they build a newly formed society – one where there is no glass ceiling and no dressing to impress. For the men, their worlds of power and prestige are turned inside-out and upside-down. And for these women, turnabout is fair play!

In order to win, the men must accede to the women’s every demand, 24/7. Here, women command and men obey. Over the series’ duration, the men will be eliminated by the women until one last man is standing.

How will the men react? How will the women treat the men? Can women effectively rule society? Will the men learn what life is like for some women in today’s world? Will this new society be a Utopia or a hell on earth? And in the end, who will be man enough to succeed in the new social order?


http://www.fox.com/fallpreview/new/whenwomenrule.htm

[Enter numerous expletives]  Wtf ?!?!

If anyone here can mention when they got any woman to 'obey' them then I'll eat my hat, and ask for seconds.  This is an absolute joke.

The constituent parts of the supposed utopia include:
Neutral dress code, like the Chinese and Cambodian Communists enforced (no dressing to impress').

Quotas for hierarchical positions, and abolition of meritocracy for various institutions, like Affirmitive Action aims to achieve(no glass ceiling).

A society built around annihalation of males and eventual polygamy (men will be eliminated by the women until one last man is standing.)

Man-hating women are in charge of society (...each with a personal axe to grind...)

The last point is the most worrying.  The others are just Communist related ideals.  But giving absolute authority to one group, over another group that they completely hate is insane.  Imagine either the Black Panthers or Neo-Nazis having control over one another.  Who in their right mind would want to promote such a view.  It's personally destructive and extremely misanthropic.

I was initially angered, but now it just appears so ridiculous.  Can't these cretins see that women do not appease every mans whim.  If they did then why would their be so many female initiated divorces, so many abortions, so many lies.  These are not the things that men want.  If these program creators knew what men want, and how their desires, hopes and dreams are sometimes dashed by women, then it would be clear to them that women do not build their lives around satisfying men, but satisfying their own desires.

Does anyone know how Hilary Clintons campaign is fairing?

[Spotted the story at www.savethemales.ca)
2
Main / Re: Global Cooling
Jun 23, 2007, 07:19 PM
Just to put this into perspective and consider that the climate of the Earth is not entirely governed by events occuring within its solar system, let alone atmosphere.  Contemplate what would happen if the Suns rays failed to reach the Earth at the levels we currently receive, global cooling perhaps, enough to wipe out the dinosaurs?  Quite possibly according to some:

Quote
Huge Space Clouds May Have Caused Mass Extinctions
By Robert Roy Britt
Senior Science Writer
posted: 03 March 2005
08:53 pm ET


Giant space clouds of gas may have changed the climate or atmosphere on Earth and fueled mass extinctions millions of years ago, scientists said Thursday.

In one scenario, the solar system passed through a dense cloud of interstellar material, causing Earth to ice over. In the other, the solar system passed through less dense clouds that destroyed the planet's protective ozone layer, raising levels of harmful ultraviolet radiation.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/050503_mass_extinctions.html


Mr X said:
Quote
But the Global Whining crowd will figure some way to spin this as human's fault.


Bah, curse those Socialist Gaia-worshipping misanthropes!  They want to destroy mans chance to get off this planet, and take destiny into his own hands by colonising other worlds. 

Who knows perhaps once Lunar or Martian colonies have been established, the colonists will revolt against unfair taxes, and create a fracas at 'New Boston' involving some crates of tea...
3
Main / Shocking babies fight club video
Feb 17, 2007, 03:32 AM
Quote
Shocking babies fight club video

by STEPHEN DEAL - Thursday, February 15, 2007

Four women forced two toddlers to fight each other as they filmed the scrap on video, a court heard yesterday.

The home movie, uncovered by social workers and played to magistrates, shows a sobbing two-year-old boy in a nappy being punched in the face by his threeyear- old sister.

The women, all from the same family, can be heard telling him 'don't be a wimp' and 'a faggot' and urging him to hit his sister back.

The terrified child tries to bury his head in a sofa but the women laugh as they urge his sister to go over and punch him again.

They then tell the boy to punch his sister back, but on the seven-minute camcorder tape he sobs and says: 'No, I don't want to.'

The little girl tries to break off the fight by asking to go to the toilet. When she she returns she is urged to attack her younger brother again. The fight continues until one woman says: 'That's enough.'

Social workers found the recording while checking on the children's welfare at home on the North Prospect estate in Plymouth.

The four women, who cannot be named to protect the children's identities, later told police they thought it was a play-fight and would be character-building.

One said: 'I could not see any harm in toughening them up. I've done the same with my own children.'

The women all admitted child cruelty at Plymouth magistrates court and the case was adjourned for pre-sentence reports.


http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=37604&in_page_id=34

Cannot be named for legal fucking reasons.  They should be strapped to the city lighthouse and left there for a fortnight to reconsider their actions.  I'm suprised that homophobic charges haven't been brought against the bitch.  After all the government have homo snitches in the classroom (www.savethemales.ca).  What's worse is that these bitches are the kids family. 

Maybe this has just made it to the press because it ties in with the UNICEF report, along with the child gun crime stories (London, UK) as of late.  Reaffirming the gist that 'this society's familes are screwed and the government needs to step in to sort it out', queue Dave Cameron and his 'compel fathers' speach.
4
Main / Re: Urinating standing up
Feb 12, 2007, 09:59 AM
Quote
Peeing standing up isn't that difficult for women, and it doesn't require a contraption, just technique.

Asian women have been doing it for millenia.


Wow, now I'm almost intrigued enough to browse through some dodgy porn.

Quote
Here are a couple of those "pee standing up" deals for women Lothar.

http://www.femalefreedom.ca/   (aka P-mate)

http://whizzy4you.com/


Cheers dude, now this supports that far-out penis envy theory.

Quote
Man,  this   is  simply   WRONG   !!!!    Are   ALL   European  countries  run  by  Feminazi   ?


Well interestingly enough, Norway where this whole thing started is not in the EU.  Which may or may not be important, but it's interesting enough that the grand European dream is not one of the originators of feminist doctrine, but it is a proponent.

Personally it seems like whether its feminising men, or masculating (?) women is missing the point, it's more about creating a bunch of genderless folk to manipulate in any way they want.
5
Main / Urinating standing up
Feb 10, 2007, 04:13 AM
http://www.winnipegsun.com/Comment/2007/02/06/3539683-sun.html

It appears to be spreading like an infectious disease, first Norway and now Germany.  Why don't they reverse the discrimination, no urinating sitting down?  All the women could play use that strange strap-on contraption that I've seen (but can't yet find), and have some fun at peeing their name into the snow.
6

I'm a bit leary about the CIA bit.


That's understandable.  If you see an article mentioning the CIA or some other secretive agency being influenced by an extremely wealthy/influential family, you'd more likely than not question the rest of the info given.  Although Mr Makow (unsuprisingly) has also written a piece on the Steinem-CIA link http://www.savethemales.ca/180302.html.  I'll just post the relevant section, as he makes other remarks on the CIAs general media influence, cultural manipulation etc.

Quote
Since writing these words last week, I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.

Steinem has tried to suppress this information, unearthed in the 1970's by a radical feminist group called "Red Stockings." In 1979, Steinem and her powerful CIA-connected friends, Katharine Graham of the Washington Post and Ford Foundation President Franklin Thomas prevented Random House from publishing it in "Feminist Revolution." Nevertheless the story appeared in the "Village Voice" on May 21, 1979.

...

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA's Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service." This was part of Meyer's "Congress for Cultural Freedom," which created magazines like "Encounter" and "Partisan Review" to promote a left-liberal chic to oppose Marxism. Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.

One of Steinem's CIA colleagues was Clay Felker. In the early 1960's, he became an editor at Esquire and published articles by Steinem which established her as a leading voice for women's lib. In 1968, as publisher of New York Magazine, he hired her as a contributing editor, and then editor of Ms. Magazine in 1971. Warner Communications put up almost all the money although it only took 25% of the stock. Ms. Magazine's first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy's Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the cream of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.

Steinem's personal relationships also belie her anti establishment pretensions. She had a nine-year relationship with Stanley Pottinger, a Nixon-Ford assistant attorney general, credited with stalling FBI investigations into the assassinations of Martin Luther King, and the ex-Chilean Foreign Minister Orlando Latelier. In the 1980's, she dated Henry Kissinger. For more details, see San Francisco researcher Dave Emory.



Quote
...before women's lib the bankers couldn't tax half the population..


???

The government taxes the population.  Bankers collect interest on consumer and business loans.


I'm not sure on that point, but Russo wrote and directed a film (From Freedom to Fascism) about the IRS, the American constitution, and the legality of income tax.  So from that I would assume that he was refering to the FED or it was just a slip of the tongue.
7
Quote
...
In a later conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo what he thought women's liberation was about. Russo's response that he thought it was about the right to work and receive equal pay as men, just as they had won the right to vote, caused Rockefeller to laughingly retort, "You're an idiot! Let me tell you what that was about, we the Rockefeller's funded that, we funded women's lib, we're the one's who got all of the newspapers and television - the Rockefeller Foundation."

Rockefeller told Russo of two primary reasons why the elite bankrolled women's lib, one because before women's lib the bankers couldn't tax half the population and two because it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model.

This revelation dovetails previous admissions on behalf of feminist pioneer Gloria Steinem (pictured) that the CIA bankrolled Ms. Magazine as part of the same agenda of breaking up traditional family models.
...


Russo starts talking about Women's Lib on the video after 7:20.

For all those skeptics out there, get your tin-foil hats at the ready!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm