This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Topics - BRIAN
Thanks to all who have served.
Remind a RadFem that she is only free to speak her mind and spread her hate because millions of men resisted the forces of tyrany through the force of arms.
I am listening to it right now. Apparently they all KNEW he was married. Makes you wonder why the RADFEMS never say anything about the "Other Woman" in affairs. I can't imagine knowing a woman was married and still having sex with her. Do I have an over developed sense of personal honor, or are there a lot of men out there who will have sex with a married woman? And how hypocritical are the RADFEMS to condemn men having afairs as abusive while giving women who know they are fucking maried men a pass.
RENO, Nev. (AP) - Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger has been accused of sexual assault in a civil lawsuit, his lawyer said, denying the claim.
Roethlisberger is one of nine defendants listed in the online court docket report. Further details of the lawsuit were not available Tuesday morning.
"Ben has never sexually assaulted anyone ... The timing of the lawsuit and the absence of a criminal complaint and a criminal investigation are the most compelling evidence of the absence of any criminal conduct. If an investigation is commenced, Ben will cooperate fully and Ben will be fully exonerated," David Cornwell, Roethlisberger's lawyer, said in a statement released early Tuesday.
A phone message and e-mail from the AP to Cornwell were not returned.
Attorney Calvin R. Dunlap, of Reno, filed the lawsuit, according to court documents. A telephone message left for him was not returned. [/font]
Wait for it the RADFEMS will be calling form blood soon.[font=Verdana][/font][font=Verdana][/font]
Found this on foxnews.com. Even the Hulkster isn't immune to false accusations. This one could qualify as a story on both false accuations and parental alienation. But the FEMs all say that niether on of those things ever happen. Brooke Hogan Apologizes for Accusing Hulk of Abuse
Brooke Hogan recently signed an affidavit alleging that her father Hulk was abusive both physically and verbally toward her mother Linda, but the 20-year-old has now apologized for her mistake.
Hogan told People magazine that she signed the documents under pressure from her mother (who filed for divorce last December) and at a time when she was upset with Hulk due to rumors of infidelity.
According to a rep for the reality starlet, Brooke is deeply "distressed" over Linda's latest scheme to cause even more mayhem in the fractured family.
"I love my mother and hope to one day reconcile with her," Brooke also told the mag. "But using kids as pawns in a divorce is awful. Every day my mother resorts to this kind of behavior makes it much harder for us to have a relationship again."
An inside source told Pop Tarts that a relationship between mother and daughter is nonexistent, but Hulk has been Brooke's shoulder to cry on during this ordeal.
"He would do anything for Brooke," said our source, adding that the two are growing very close again.
Here is the link:http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,391048,00.html
I am traveling in Indiana this weekend for business purposes. I saw this morning two billboards with Duluth Model inspired slogans on them. One said "Deliberately scaring me is abuse stop it." The other said "Threatening me is abuse, stop it." Both had the partial view of a womans face with frightened eyes. Now to me it seems that both of those statements could be applied to either sex, but the imagery of a womans face with a frightened expression makes the message abundantly clear; only men batter and abuse.
I wonder if we mens rights activeists could put up billboards with the following slogans showing a downtrodden man:
Withholding sex and affection to get your way is abuse, don't do it.
Threatening to divorce me and seperate me from my children is abuse, don't do it.
Crying to manipulate me is abuse, don't do it.
False accusations of battery to have me arrested is abuse, don't do it.
I would glady send a few dollars in to any organization that would run that add campagne(I suspect tax dollars payed for the billboards in Indianapolis). But that is not the point, I fear that no outdoor advertising compay would accept the money and run the billboards with those messages.
Well this story isn't getting much play in the Tampa area much less in the U.S. national news. A two yearold boy vanished from his bedroom on 8/27/06. Yesterday the boys mother shot herself to death. She was involved in a contintious divorce and custody battle with the boys father. She refused a polygraph from the police which the boys father took and passed. No details at this point but they say you only need three points in an investigation to start drawing a conclusion.
Point one: The boy goes missing without a trace.
Point two: The mother refuses to cooperate fully with the police.
point three: The boys mother and father were fighting for custody.
point four: The mother kills her self.
The conclusion that I am starting to draw is that the mother killed the boy to prevent the father from gaining custody and then killed herself out of guilt.http://www.970wfla.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=124415&article=860187
I was listening to a talk radio show yesterday. They were discussing the Yates verdict and why it was not guilty by reason of insanity instead of guilty but insane(There is such a thing in some jurisdictions). The general concensus was that she was getting off easy but some feminist wackadoo women called and emailed in that it was Russel Yates fault, he should have seen it comming and he caused it because he was too controlling. No proof or factual evidence just the asumption that he must have caused this woman in some way to kill his 5 children. I was flabergasted but at the same time not surprised.
The battered womans syndrome that is. I wonder how long it will be before she has a Battalion of N.O.W. attorneys wringing their hands at how she was opressed by the horible patriarchal minister husband she shot.http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,201755,00.html
From the statement of Mary Winkler as read in court by Tenessee State police investigator Brian Booth.
"When she left, Matthew Winkler was still alive," Freeland said.
Winkler said she and her husband had argued throughout the evening about several things, including family finances. The problems were "mostly my fault," she said, because she was in charge of keeping the family books.
"He had really been on me lately criticizing me for things -- the way I walk, I eat, everything. It was just building up to a point. I was tired of it. I guess I got to a point and snapped,"
She just snapped so she waited untill he was in bed sleeping and grabbed the shotgun out of the closet and shot him in the back breaking his spine. Nope no premeditation there. This Bitch better realize she is in Tenessee not California and people have more common sense than to let her try and run that weak ass excuse on them. :evil:
My wife and I watch big love on HBO. It's a pretty good show with an intersting storyline. Last night the season finally made me wonder, in a plural marriage situation why is it always the man who is the criminal? I realize that yes there are some wackadoo cults that force underage girls to marry, but there are instances of adult women entering into plural marriage as well. My thoughts ar two-fold here:
1) It seems to me that a woman that goes into a plural marriange arrangement would be just as guilty of polygamy as a man.
2) The other women in a plural marriage would be guilty of at least criminal conspiracy, particulary in the case of the wackadoo cults forceing a young girl to mary an adult.
I have never heard of a case where the women are prosectued for the crime of polygamy though. Nor have I ever heard of a woman in one of the plural marriages being deemed complicit in an act of statutory rape for knowingly letting an underage girl consumate a plural marriage.
Makes you wonder don't it.
From fox news:
DURHAM, N.C. -- DNA testing failed to connect any members of the Duke University lacrosse team to the alleged rape of a stripper, attorneys for the athletes said Monday.
Citing DNA test results delivered by the state crime lab to police and prosecutors a few hours earlier, the attorneys said the test results prove their clients did not sexually assault and beat a stripper hired to perform at a March 13 team party.
No charges have been filed in the case.
"There is no DNA evidence that shows she was touched by any of these boys," said Attorney Joe Cheshire, who represents one of the team's captains.
Dang a rape happened but no DNA from the alleged atackers could be matched to the evidence collected from the victims. Don't that beat all? I just bet it was them space aliens that abduct folks and give'm anal probes that done it all.
This will be my first topic that I have started on this board so be gentle I am a Virgin.
Something that is near and dear to my heart since I spent 10 years in the U.S. Army is millitrary preparedness and standards. When the U.S. Millitary was first integrated combining both male and female personell(Previously there had been organizations like the WACS) the physical training standards were the same for male and female. A female soldier had to do the same ammount of push ups and situps as a male soldier and run the same time in the two mile run. Few women could make the cut and thus their were few female soldiers. Then in the 1970's Title IX came along and the service academies(Westpoint, Anapolis, The Airforce and Coast Guard academies) had to go Co-Ed. The first few female cadets to make the program washed out quickly because they could not meet the physical requirments. Congress quickly jumped in and ordered a "Gender Norming" policy. The military was ordered to come up with a seperate but equal standard for women. There was a study that came up with the fact that the average male had about 40% mor upperbody strength and about 80% more cardio-respiratory capacity and endurance. So they set the minimum scores on the physical training tests at corresponding levels. For example the 18-24 year old male soldier had to complete 42 correct push-ups and 63 sit-ups in 2 minutes and complete a timed 2 mile run in 14 min 58 seconds. The female soldier in the same age bracket had to do 12 push-ups and 43 sit-ups in 2 minutes and run the 2 miles in 19:58. Worked fine for keeping the females in the service but it didn't translate well to the real world where METL (Mission Essential Task List) Tasks could not be "Gender Normed". 40 pound crates of ammo, 95 pound howitzer and tank main gun rounds and the M60 machinegun all weighed the same for men or women reguardless of what the PT Test regulations said. Also certain common soldier skills presented a problem. A soldier was expected to carry or drag a wounded budy 1000 meters to the rear to an aid station. Most females couldn't do those things but 99% of the males could. With even more jobs opened up to females in the mid 1990s this became more of a problem with units closer to the forward edge of the battle field becoming even more integrated. Slots once filled by male soldiers were now being filled by less physically capable females who could not do the jobs at the same level. This hurt unit rediness, capablity and morale. I saw some of this first hand at the end of my Army career. I have horror stories about it and I am sure that there are some of you out there in some professions (Police, Fire Rescue, Park Service and Construction) that have similar expiriences. So post them up here and lets discuss them.
I just found your group and decided to register. I will probably lurk a bit and post once in a while. I am amazed sometimes at how the web gives an upopular viewpoint a forum.