Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - daksdaddy

Main / My Fuckin Gawd!
Jan 02, 2005, 12:11 AM

Quote from: "worldnetdaily"
Posted: January 23, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


"Roast baby?" "Baby margaritas?" "Bloody baby marys?" These are the sassy intrigues of participants in a discussion about abortion on the website of an international feminist magazine.

Bust magazine styles itself as a hip "girl" resource with a website that offers a "lounge," or discussion forum.

A WND reader who has contributed for about three years to a politics forum on the site, called "As the World Turns," said he recently has become "absolutely shocked by the statements I've read there, of feminists so jaded that they are freely joking about eating dead babies, and of the many ways that they could cook up their own abortions and dine on them."

Earlier this month, a contributor who goes by "isobel123," wrote that "the problem with adoption is, we really enjoy killing babies and would hate to have to miss out on that. We love squishing their little baby heads and watching their little baby brains come out their little baby eyesockets as their little chubby baby arms writhe helplessly in little chubby baby pain."

Last Thursday, "charliebaby," in response to a previous post, wrote "your roast baby sounds like a wonderful thanksgiving/christmas dinner. mmmmmmmm..... "

"Lilacwhine," on Jan. 15, wrote of sipping a martini and twirling "the dead baby around in it."

"Charliebaby" responded that "of course there are baby margeritas! [sic] but you really must try the bloody baby marys!"

"It's a weakness we feminists have, us and our baby killing," wrote "dinaofdoom."

A poster called "angstgrrl" offered a poem:

   "I kill children
   I love to see them die
   I kill children
   And make their mamas cry
   Crush 'em under my car
   I wanna hear them scream
   Feed 'em poison candy
   To spoil their Halloween

   So your're in the kids' ward
   You're in there cos you're ill
   How about some Pavulon
   So I can see you chill

   Time to hit the scool bus
   I think I'll shoot the tires
   Offer them a helping hand
   Of open telephone wires"

A review of Bust's quarterly print publication on, praising its "professional quality" and "amazing content," said it's what "MS magazine was supposed to be."

"With the edginess and energy of a home-grown 'zine, but the look and readability of a mainstream magazine, Bust does a great job of capturing what modern young women are thinking and caring about," the reviewer said.

Another Epinions reviewer said, "In an effort to make feminism appeal to young women, Bust Magazine has unknowingly fallen into the same trap that the likes of every young women's magazine today has fallen into, with the exception of B*tch Magazine. From cover to cover, profanity runs rampant, and hypersexuality is a common theme. Although feminism promotes sexuality, and the right to say what you need to, Bust has over used this aspect to appeal to a mainstream audience."

Nuff Said?
Main / Corporate sponsorship
Dec 31, 2004, 10:20 AM
Main / From my website
Dec 31, 2004, 12:49 AM
Sorry, SOW...
[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Post Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by:
on December 13, 2004 at 12:24:35:

I don't fuck feminazi PIGS.

Besides is that not rape?

Oh, forgot... Only rape unless YOU, the FEMALE ititiates sex...and, even with this "exception" MOST males commit rape...right...honey?


Feminist Hate-Speech
A Misandry Sampler - Selected Feminist Quotes
Assembled by G. Shrock (with the help of many others)


"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE."
Marilyn French (her emphasis)

'My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."
Marilyn French; The Woman's Room.

"All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey."
Marilyn French

"All men are rapists and that's all they are."
Marilyn French, Author; (later, advisor to Al Gore's Presidential Campaign.)

"We live, I am trying to say, in an epidemic of male violence against women."
Katha Pollitt.

"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman."
Catherine MacKinnon

"I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it."
Former Congresswoman Barbara Jordan.

"The traditional flowers of courtship are the traditional flowers of the grave, delivered to the victim before the kill. The cadaver is dressed up and made up and laid down and ritually violated and consecrated to an eternity of being used."
Andrea Dworkin

"The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations...obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign."
Marilyn French

"Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release."
Germaine Greer.

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience."
Catherine Comin, Vassar College. Assistant Dean of Students.

"Men renounce whatever they have in common with women so as to experience no commonality with women; and what is one piece of flesh a few inches long, the penis. The penis is the man; the man is human; the penis signifies humanity."
Andrea Dworkin

"You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs."
Catherine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; University of Michigan, & Yale.)

"Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence."
Judith Levine

"Men's sexuality is mean and violent, and men so powerful that they can 'reach WITHIN women to fuck/construct us from the inside out.' Satan-like, men possess women, making their wicked fantasies and desires women's own. A woman who has sex with a man, therefore, does so against her will, 'even if she does not feel forced.'
Judith Levine, (explicating comment profiling prevailing misandry.)

'To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."
Scum Manifesto. (Valerie Solanas)

((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as "The Fucking Molesters Society". (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory.))

((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SHIT; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY.))

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things."
Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men.)

"Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do."
Popular Feminist Graffiti

"I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love,' for the men women share their lives with--husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, coworkers."
Judith Levine, My Enemy, My love

"There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts'...includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder."
J. Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document, (A southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex.)

"All men are good for is fucking, and running over with a truck".
Statement made by A University of Maine Feminist Administrator, quoted by Richard Dinsmore, who brought a successful civil suit against the University in the amount of $600,000. Richard had protested the quote; was dismissed thereafter on the grounds of harassment; and responded by bringing suit against the University. 1995 settlement.

"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
Andrea Dworkin; from her book Ice and Fire .

"Men are rapists, batterers, plunderers, killers; these same men are religious prophets, poets, heroes, figures of romance, adventure, accomplishment, figures ennobled by tragedy and defeat. Men have claimed the earth, called it "Her". Men ruin Her. Men have airplanes, guns, bombs, poisonous gases, weapons so perverse and deadly that they defy any authentically human imagination.
Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women

"On the Left, on the Right, in the Middle; Authors, statesmen, thieves; so-called humanists and self-declared fascists; the adventurous and the contemplative, in every realm of male expression and action, violence is experienced and articulated as love and freedom."
Andrea Dworkin, Pornography: Men Possessing Women.

"I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal.".
Journalist Sylvia Fraser

"We are taught, encouraged, moulded by and lulled into accepting a range of false notions about the family. As a source of some of our most profound experiences, it continues to be such an integral part of our emotional lives that it appears beyond criticism. Yet hiding from the truth of family life leaves women and children vulnerable."
Canadian Panel on Violence Against Women.

Catharine MacKinnon ( ) maintains that "the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor." In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid--ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed--they're "hiding from the truth." The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to "breed" them for that purpose.
Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window; (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, Gloria Steinhem et al tenets of misandric belief.)

"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.

"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."
Robin Morgan

"And let's put one lie to rest for all time: the lie that men are oppressed, too, by sexism--the lie that there can be such a thing as 'men's liberation groups.' Oppression is something that one group of people commits against another group, specifically because of a 'threatening' characteristic shared by the latter group--skin, color, sex or age, etc. The oppressors are indeed FUCKED UP by being masters, but those masters are not OPPRESSED. Any master has the alternative of divesting himself of sexism or racism--the oppressed have no alternative--for they have no power but to fight. In the long run, Women's Liberation will of course free men--but in the short run it's going to cost men a lot of privilege, which no one gives up willingly or easily. Sexism is NOT the fault of women--kill your fathers, not your mothers".
Robin Morgan.

"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies."
Andrea Dworkin

"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent."
Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.

"And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference."
Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime.

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist".
Ti-Grace Atkinson, Amazon Odyssey (p. 86).

"(Rape) is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear".
Susan Brownmiller, Against Our Will p.6.

"When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression..."
Sheila Jeffrys.

From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985:

MALE:...represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants...the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female. obsolete life form... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched...a contradictory baby-man...

Letter to editor: "Women's Turn to Dominate". "......Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck--and if you get in my way I'll run you down."
Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 Feb., 1996.

"If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal--a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students--I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed," said Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.

"Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex."
Valerie Solana, SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men.)

"Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact."
Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood.


Another posting on FEMISA: "Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers."
Both quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work,

"At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages."
Heather Hart 7

"Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo."
Jodie Foster in The New York Times Magazine.

* * *

"The prejudicial, man-hating cant of militant 'gender' (victimal) Feminists has foolishly served only to reinforce a counter-sexist prejudice that holds ALL women to be likewise self-serving, manipulative, irrational, organized into a kind of monolithic Collective Shrew, throwing a massive slo-mo cultural tantrum among us. It is the classic tactic of infantile Passive Control, a strategy vehemently protested against by Equity Feminists, who are none of that (as is no mature adult)...

"What we are seeing in this headless misandry is a grand display of the Tyranny of the Underdog: 'I am a wretchedly longstanding victim; therefore I own no burden of adult accountability, nor need to honor any restraint against my words and actions. In fact, all efforts to restrain me are only further proof of my oppressed condition.'

"It is the most perfect trump-card against accountable living ever devised."

Gladden Schrock, from The Tyranny of the Underdog.

Follow Ups:

   * Re: Sorry, SOW... --- Holly 12:37:24 12/13/04

Post a Followup:

Name / Nickname:



[ Read Follow-ups ] [ Pos

t Follow-up ] [ Custody Reform Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ]
Main / The uncertainty principle with hair
Dec 30, 2004, 07:53 AM
Hitler was a byproduct of Galileo, Joan of Arc, Beethoven; an inevitable (if not entirely predictable consequence of evolution.) For every beneficial mutation -including those responsible for our current heading on this, our collective journey, our species must labor to get out from beneath myriad distressing possibilities.
We are the Uncertainty principle with hair (well, most of us.) Breathing deep of destiny, we exhale potential, creating an atmosphere to provide for the growth of our soul.
Where are we going, and how are we going to get there are perhaps the two most significant questions we must pose ourselves.
These two questions lie beyond the ability of any mirror we can yet devise; nonetheless, we shall persevere, unless of course, the Universe chooses to intercede.
The Universe does this regularly.
We are many colours and we believe different things. Our task as I see it, is to outwit the Universe. An important first step is to think. Strangely enough, the second step is belief, although on occasion it is misdirected.
We must believe in ourselves.
We must believe in our ability to defne a better destiny, and should we so choose, a better mirror within which we can gauge our past successes and failures but never, never know tomorrow.
Main / A Boring Article About the President
Dec 27, 2004, 02:19 AM
A Boring Article About the President

President Bush announced a new budget plan yesterday, incorporating a new series of tax cuts and a revised budget for the Pentagon.

"I think I've proved that my uncle the editor does not read past the first paragraph of any story," said reporter Ephram Watley. "Having established that this story is about some nonexistent budgetary matter, he's passing over the rest of the article, even though it's total nonsense."

The rest of the article, according to the reporter, would consist entirely of random snatches of text intended to superficially mimic the appearance of a typical article, including paragraphs of approximately correct lengths and the appropriate number of quotes inserted.

"This is about the point where we'd be quoting from a second person, so I'll use a different name this time," said Ephram Waters. "Not that it matters, because we've already established that Uncle Zeke does not always read the entire article, particularly when it is close to a holiday."

The reporter went on to say that 40% of such articles would use statistical percentages of some sort or other, and that it was 90% likely that throwing in some random numbers would give the article the right "gestalt" for anyone glancing over the body of the text.

President Bush is mentioned again for the purpose of providing a visual "hook" that follows on the nonsensical theme raised in the first paragraph. It might raise suspicions if the president's name were not mentioned anywhere else in the article, but this second use of the name should satisfy a quick overview.

"I kind of object to Ephram's blatant abuse of the editor's trust, but I have to say it's in character," said fellow reporter Emmett Waters. "I do appreciate the chance to be cited directly in an article, even if it's one that will not be read by anyone."

The reporter has cleverly snuck this preposterous waste of space on Page Three, where it will be guaranteed a lifetime of obscurity, in order to minimize the chances that anyone would catch him or report the lapse to the editor.

"The word count is reaching an appropriate length, so I think it's time to end with the gratuitous use of the words economics, fiscal, and fiduciary," said Ephram. "That will give the final paragraph just the right flavor of authenticity. Now, if you please, let's open that bottle of 18 year old Macallan I snuck out of my uncle's office and let's begin our holiday

I swear, this had me laughing for about 25 minutes, solid.

Dhaka - A fifty-year-old Bangladeshi man, who had taken eight wives, had his penis resized by his estranged first wife who wanted to put an end to his marriages, the Bengali-language Ittefaq reported on Saturday.

Abdus Sattar, a Dhaka rickshaw driver, was rushed to hospital early on Friday, Ittefaq said.

Sattars first wife Aklima Banu reportedly told police that she shortened her husband's penis because it was driving him to marry one woman after another. Banu told police she used a razor blade to slice a portion of the penis off while Sattar was sleeping.

Banu, who had been residing in a village in southern Bangladesh with her in-laws, learnt about her husband's marriages after recently travelling to Dhaka. - Sapa-dpa
These are pictures I found recently.

Merry Fucking X_mas Indeed. These men are being brought into the fold of extremists.
I wonder? What are we fighting for?

Main / This ones fer Devia!
Dec 23, 2004, 06:03 PM
Quote from: "Devia"
Show me your image pasted as the bad guy.

Good enough for ya?
Main / In a Pickle
Dec 22, 2004, 02:20 PM
One day, Bill comes home from the pickle factory where he works and confesses to his wife that he has a terrible urge to stick his penis into the pickle slicer. His wife suggests he see a sex therapist to talk about it, but Bill says he'd be too embarrassed, and he vows to overcome the compulsion on his own. One day a few weeks later, Bill comes home absolutely ashen.
"What's wrong, Bill?" his wife asks.
"Do you remember that I told you how I had this tremendous urge to put my penis into the pickle slicer?"
"Oh, Bill, you didn't."
"Yes, I did."
"My God, Bill, what happened?"
"She and I both got fired."
Main / Disscusion with a feminist.
Dec 21, 2004, 11:54 PM
"Would you attribute the fact that i restrain myself from killing you to feminism or basic humanity"?
That was a question I posed to a feminist aquaintance..

"Ahhhhh ,Ummmm,Ahhh Waddaya mean"?

"Well", I said, "do you believe that my non-violent nature is because feminism has made it safe for people to go about thier daily business or is that simply a basic trait of humans, non-violence I mean"?

"Ahhhmmmm, Er, Welllll..... I'm not sure."

"C'mon, think about it! Do you believe that I am non-violent because i fear state intervention and or retribution? or do you believe that the fact i am non-violent is inherent to my nature"?

"Could you rephrase that"? She said.

"Okay"! "Give me your hand" ........ "Now try and pull it away". ................"Ugh".................."Let GO"! ................. "NOW"! .............................. "Kay could you please let go"? "Yeah sure, No problem" I said. "Do you think I let go because of your threatening, or your pleading"?

"WELL PLEASE IS NOT PLEADING". "Sure it is" I said. "NO IT'S NOT". "Yes it is, you've admited that you are not powerful enough to overcome me so you had to appeal to my humanity to let you go". "Well maybe not "pleading" though, maybe we could call it I know, "appealing"." she said. "You know as in appealing to your senses". "Wait a goddamn minute! That is part of what I was trying to say, but how do you define appeal"? "Weeellllll, by "appeal" I mean, to be found attractive, or sexy.
Is this wank hitting on me? Does she believe that sexual allure will distract me? I thought."I mean," she continued  "maybe it's pure animal attraction that caused you to let go of my hand, maybe chivalry, maybe you just think you'll be able to fuck me if you treat me nice".

To which I replied. "I would rather chew on tinfoil while shaving my head with a cheese grater". "and besides, you haven't answered my question yet".

"Uhhhhhmmmm....................Er....................  What was the question"? She moaned.
My reply? See ya!
One of these days my humanity is going to give in, and it aint gonna be for sex.
Main / They may be helpful.
Dec 21, 2004, 10:13 PM



   * Law Enforcement Officers
   * Children's Protective Services
   * Judges
   * Attorneys
   * Bureaucrats
   * Politicians

We, the Sovereign  Children of God residing in the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America have completely HAD IT with being denied our American Civil Rights, Miranda Rights, Search Warrants, Due Process, Equal Protection of the Law, trial by jury before an IMPARTIAL judge SWORN to Uphold, Support and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States of America.

You are hereby put on notice that your attacks on our persons, children, families, businesses, property, and finances are going to be repelled.

Do you get the message?
Main / How bout this instead
Dec 21, 2004, 04:34 PM
Sorry for all the pic posts, but i'm kinda having with it.


Main / Feminist?
Dec 21, 2004, 03:33 PM
Main / Responsible Mother
Dec 21, 2004, 03:29 PM
Main / Nuks. Take a look.
Dec 16, 2004, 09:14 PM
Take a look at this site.
Main / Now, I wonder why that is?
Dec 08, 2004, 05:09 PM

VANCOUVER - Some broadcasters in British Columbia are refusing to run a public service ad
that urges men to have their prostate checked for cancer.
The ad shows a doctor pulling a ticking time bomb from a patient's behind.
Main / Chew on this!
Dec 08, 2004, 12:20 AM
The net effect of feminism is to make any population that practices it, dumber. The overall IQ of any population practicing feminism, will over time become lower. Why is that? Because the women with high IQ's of any such society will be drawn into the feminist web, and they will fail to reproduce at even a replacement rate.

What is it about feminism that seeks out and destroys intelligence? Here are a few factors:

   * One of the primary goals of feminism is to promote the freeing of women from the "mundane" task of raising children. Feminism has set as one of its goals: zero children for women; a goal which is of course suicidal, but that does not slow them down.

   * Should a woman, who practices the religion of feminism, become pregnant, she will be encouraged by her fellow feminists to have an abortion, and terminate the child's life within her.

   * Women who are feminists, are driven to have careers. So, even if they want to have children, they view that as something to be done later, and to be done quickly. In other words, they will have only one, or at the most two children, if they get around to it at all. If they fail to have this attitude, they fear that the childbearing process will destroy their careers.

   * Women who do the best in school, the most intelligent, will be the most sought after by the feminist clergy who dominated the school system. These bright young women, will be pushed and directed away from any thoughts of being a wife and mother as a career. They will be pounded with rhetoric, and lies, about how terrible past women had it, and how important it is that they not give in and "go traditional." By the time they have finished college they have been through a top quality brainwashing campaign, and it is very unlikely that they will be able to overcome it on their own.

What happens when all of the brightest young ladies fail to have children? It will leave only the less intelligent women to shoulder the burden of carrying on the most important task of all: creating the next generation. Women who are not doing well in school, do not draw the feminist sharks to them. They are allowed to proceed on their own course, and the Leftist propaganda, framed for confusing the intelligent mind into acceptance, passes lesser minds by. These woman, who often make wonderful mothers, will go out into the world and they will have families, as they should. However the higher IQ ladies are lost to the gene pool.

If you think about it, it is the equivalent of an enemy army coming into a country and shooting all of the most intelligent men in the country. Those high IQ individuals will have their genes removed from the gene pool, and the next generation will be that much dumber than the previous generation. Being done generation after generation, the results of this feminist sifting process will accumulate over time. As it runs its course, there will be fewer and fewer intelligent people in each generation.

In America today, thanks to Leftist philosophy in general, and feminism specifically, the best and brightest in our society are reproducing at a level well below the replacement level of 2.1 children. (The replacement level is the number of children, on average a group of families must have in order for that group to maintain its current population and to replace itself.) In fact the latest number I have heard is they are producing 1.5 children on average.

Besides having dismantled our world class school system, the Leftists are now stealing our most intelligent children from the future generations by promoting the feminist religion to the members of our society. We will slowly but surely be forced into being a dumb, uneducated people who will be only too happy to reside in the third world society that is planned for our future.

Taking genetic inheritance into consideration, would halt feminism in its tracks. What our society should be doing is to encourage the most intelligent women to reproduce in as large numbers as is physically possible, rather than hanging a "Condemned for a Career" sign over their womb. By having high IQ women producing large families we would raise the average IQ of the next generation. That means we would increase the standard of living for that new generation, because standard of living is directly tied to IQ. There are studies which show that criminal behavior is tied to lower IQ and that people with higher IQs are more likely to be law abiding citizens. So, by chucking feminism out the door, for the next generation, we can raise the intelligence, the standard of living, and at the same time lower the crime rate.

Of course that will not mean anything to the average feminist. They are not interested in future generations, or else they would not support abortion, which has killed more young citizens of future America than there are people in the entire country of Canada. Feminists are only interested in power for themselves. Everything else is mere trapping, and window dressing. People like that are not open to reason. They are not sympathetic to other's difficulties. They are focused on their own selfish gain, not America's future.

What are you focused on? The Leftist, Marxist view of "equality" that drove the Soviet Union into the horrors of mass exterminations, and bankruptcy? Or the "inequality" of America that built this great land, and produced long term marriages, the best schools in the world, and the freest society for men and women that has ever existed? Since 1960 we have been rapidly moving towards the Soviet model and leaving our American model farther and farther behind. Our marriages have broken up, our schools have fallen into decay, and our freedom has been squeezed into an ever more restrictive box.

Those who support feminism do not care. The Leftists are celebrating the negative changes that have come upon our society. They do not feel robbed by the loss of freedom. They do not shed a tear over the collapse of our schools. They do not fret at all over the complete fragmentation of our homes. They applaud the enforcement of their agenda upon all others, as if totalitarian action is just fine. They can justify any outlandish action by "spinning" the motive to where it sounds "caring."

Do you know where this is heading? The Marxist will not be satisfied with merely pushing feminist ideals down your throat with a billy club. If you have paid attention at all during the last few presidential elections, they are quite intent on removing financial forms of inequality too. "Caring" people will no longer accept the concept that rich people should have rich privileges, like living in a big house, or driving a nice car. That is not "fair" to the Marxist. He who produces has no claim on more privilege than he who fails to produce. We are all human and therefore we all should live at the same standard of living: dirt poor. We have seen this all before in Russia and we should be smart enough to tell these Leftist Stalinist clones, to shove off. Freedom was what made America great, not Marxism!

Every time you give up some of your freedom, in order to promote "fairness" you are putting one more chain on. Every time you take another step to the Left, you are one step closer to the gulag. We have already gone a long ways down this road to destruction. We must wake up and turn around soon. It should scare all Americans to think that they have a president in the White House who actually has tried to nationalize our medical system. You can find excuses for nationalizing every industry in America if you want to, and believe me, the Leftists want to! The only protection from such abuses is to put our collective foot down and nationalize no industries. We must find our own solutions to problems, without the federal government. Or we will become the enslaved people of yet one more oppressive totalitarian state.

In the mean time, think about what is happening to our future, as feminism drains the intelligence out of the gene pool. Soon, we will be too stupid to realize that we are enslaved.
Main / Take me out to the ballgame.
Dec 06, 2004, 12:28 AM
"JOEY, YOU KNOW WHEN I WAS A KID BASEBALL wasn't like it is today," said Gramps to his 15 year old grandson. The three-dimensional presentation of the game was being played out on their living room floor, and had the same perspective for them as if they were in the stadium themselves.

"Yeah," replied Joey. "You had to watch it on that little 2-D TV screen, didn't you?" The crowd roared as the fifth batter in the line up led-off the inning with a walk.

"TV wasn't what I was referring to boy," Gramps said with a shake of his head. "TV was pretty primitive in those days to be sure, but the game was a whole lot better!"

The smell of popcorn and hot dogs was all around them as the runner took a short lead off first. Some fan was yelling support for the home team and a baby could be heard off in the distance.

"Oh, sure it was Gramps!" laughed Joey. "Everything was better in the 'good old days.' We all know that!"

The pitcher didn't bother making a throw over to first and concentrated on the next batter. The bottom half of the order never stole a base and he couldn't afford another walk.

"Ha, ha," laughed Gramps without any mirth. "Back then there were 9 men on a team. All 9 of them could play ball, and most of them could hit too!"

"Even the girls?" asked Joey in disbelief. The next batter took a called fourth strike. Only one more and the pitcher would be done with this batter.

"There were no girls on the team then, that is what I am trying to tell you Joey," said Gramps. "They had 9 men on the team and no women."

"Why that is pure sexism Gramps! Everybody knows you got to have women on the team, its the law!" Joey couldn't believe what he was hearing. The courts had ruled before he was born that all sports teams had to have a compliment of female players that was at least equal in relative size to the percentage of females in the population. That meant, since there were slightly more women than men in America, the baseball teams had to have five women on the field at all times. This was just common sense.

"It wasn't the law back then!" replied Gramps with enthusiasm. "Back then you could get the best players you could afford to pay for to play on your team. Everybody played by the same rules too." Today, the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth batter were women. They were allowed 5 strikes before they were out, and 2 balls gave them a walk. Men were out after 3 strikes and it took 4 balls to walk them.

The batter took a swing at the next pitch and missed. No one seemed surprised, since the fifth through ninth batter nearly always made an out. There were rumors that the court was going to change the rules again and insist that only women could pitch to women to make the game more fair. They also were reviewing the practice of putting all the worst batters at the end of the lineup, since that was obviously a sexist approach.

"Wow Gramps," Joey said shaking his head. "Things were sure sexist when you were a kid weren't they?"

"Yes, I guess they were Joey. I guess they were." Gramps looked at the game in progress and got up. He hadn't really enjoyed a baseball game in years. Joey liked the home team and Gramps like to do things with him, but baseball just wasn't baseball anymore. As he went to get a soda pop from the kitchen, he wondered how things had ever come to be where they were now. Was sexism really such a bad thing?
Main / Marx and Feminism
Dec 06, 2004, 12:12 AM
Do you remember when Americans said, "Better dead than Red," and meant it? It wasn't all that long ago. The Marxist/Socialist/Communist way of life, and its associated tyranny, were considered anathema to American life by the vast majority of our citizens. You cannot have a land of opportunity, when all are rewarded equally. You cannot have freedom when the government is telling you how to live. Your basic human right of raising your children up to believe as you do is not compatible with the Marxist goal of brainwashing the children into the party doctrine. So, what does this have to do with feminism?

Have you heard of Shulamith Firestone? Here is one of the founding "fathers" of the modern feminist movement. Her book, "The Dialectic of Sex" contains many of the concepts that are foundational to the feminist today. Her entire basis for change in America was the Marxist model. If you look at every country where Marx's philosophy has been taken seriously, you will see a country where freedom, prosperity and the pursuit of happiness have been throttled down to idle and ultimately the fire goes out. But feminists still burn with the desire to make Shulamith's dream come true.

What are some of the improvements that this feminist wanted to implement? (Since this was the goal beforehand, it is a good measuring device to see how many of these things have actually come to pass.)

   * The destruction of the family and the institution of marriage. - Since modern feminism has taken root, you will note that families are now temporary experiments that fall apart at the first sign of trouble. The vast majority of children are no longer raised by both of their own parents. This "improvement" has made a great deal of progress to date, and as the feminists continue to be listened to the trend will certainly worsen.
   * Total sexual liberation. - The burning of the bra was the most classic symbolism used by the feminists kicking off their campaign in the sixties. Most Americans had no idea what the symbol was supposed to represent, but it was clearly to show the opening of the door of sexual unbridling for women. At that time, living together, while unmarried, was considered wrong for men and women by the majority of Americans. Today that attitude has pretty much gone away and the virgin bride is more often found in jokes than in a wedding ceremony.
   * The elimination of private property. - Have you noticed how much of your right of ownership has slipped since the feminists have been at work? Taxes are up to 50% of your income. Property taxes beat at your tenuous hold on your house, threatening to dislodge your grip if you should be unemployed for a short while. You no longer can defend your property in many states. If you cannot defend it, you don't own it!
   * Easy divorce. - Have you heard of the "no-fault" divorce? You do not need grounds for a divorce today. If one of the parties in a marriage wants out, that is all it takes. This goals has been met already in its entirety.
   * Elimination of a bread winner by having the state provide. - The welfare state has been strongly driven by the feminists. Who has received the vast majority of welfare assistance? Why mothers with dependent children. Result, men are no longer required as breadwinners. This is a very expensive proposition and has been disastrous to our nation in very many ways, but the feminists have gotten their wish.
   * Women in control of the reproduction process. - Does the slaughter of over 30 million innocent children ring a bell with you? Abortion has insanely become a "woman's right to choose" and the execution of children, because they are not wanted, is considered humane.
   * All women working outside the home. - The numbers are continually growing, and the feminists are still ridiculing the women who do stay at home. This goal is nearly met, and while the disastrous results of this goal are ignored, feminists keep beating the drum for the working woman.
   * The state to provide 24 hour day care for the children. - This one is in the works. We keep hearing day care brought up in congress and by politicians in general. The feminists are pushing hard to get this in place. The desire to eliminate the family as a training ground for children is strong in the feminist and they are doing all they can to make it happen soon.
   * Elimination of religion. - Have you noticed how many feminists are all fired up interested in being priests and pastors? Why do you suppose that is? Since Marx was an atheist and the radical feminists are Marxist in philosophy, doesn't there seem to be some problem with the idea of being an atheistic priest? Not to the feminist! They do not care beans about religion except to eliminate it as an opposing force. How better to eliminate it than by infiltrating and destroying from the inside? If you have read anything by the feminist "theologians" you will quickly realize that they are not just putting a new perspective on older ideas. Not at all! They are completely trashing the old ideas and replacing them with wonderful sounding atheistic concepts. When they speak of God, it is tongue in cheek, calling up the pagan worship of goddesses and the priestesses. This is why that feminists do not only start up their own competing religions, to have their own freedom of religion. That would be counter productive to their cause. Instead they are attempting, with great success, to destroy the family-supporting religions which oppose them.

Marxism has been given its day on planet earth. It is a failure and always will be. Modern feminism is tied closely with Marx and as listed above, their goals are not compatible with American culture or society. They do not want equal pay for equal work. They want to reinvent the American way of life and shape it into a Marxist totalitarian state.

There are three possible outcomes from the position we are in. 1) We wake up and throw the Marxists out on their ear and rebuild the America we had before; 2) Continue to placate the feminists and dismantle America into a iron fisted dictatorship; 3) Do nothing until it becomes unbearable and have a civil war/revolution to try and reestablish the original constitution.

The first option would be extremely difficult at the moment, with the feminists controlling the schools, government and media. Where do you hear a voice against feminism today? You don't! Even though the changes that they are proposing and have already implemented into our lives are completely un-American, people are not even concerned by and large.

The second and third options are the easy ones for today but the extremely difficult ones for the future. In either of these cases, lives will be lost in the millions, and America will not be rebuilt in our lifetimes. We are facing a grave crisis and people do not see a problem of any serious nature.

Americanism and Marx are old enemies. Liberalism and Marx are old friends. Feminism and Marx are married.

An interesting and related article:

FEMINISM by Dale O'Leary
Main / Angry young Man!
Dec 05, 2004, 08:26 PM
Dr Evil has been kind enough to post this song i wrote.
Title is self explanitory. I know that Lyrically its lacking, but captures my, and hopefully some of your feelings as well.

Thanks Again Dr Evil.

PS: listen with stereo headphones for best results.