Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - poiuyt

21
Main / a lecture for serfs
Sep 25, 2007, 03:53 AM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/men/article2522863.ece

Debrett's guide to men's manners advises that your relationship with other women is vital to the one you have with your girlfriend
...

Quote
These bad habits do not impress us

Nobody's perfect and not all bad habits are deal-breakers. That said, any man honing his seduction skills will do well to avoid:

ARROGANCE

The dangerous delusion that your needs, desires or opinions are, without exception, more important than the next man's is the No 1 turn-off for women. Arrogance should never be confused with confidence. If you're boasting to impress us, it is likely to have the opposite effect. Ladies know that quality is discreet. We wouldn't pick a handbag that shouts too hard and we won't pick you.

BEING DRUNK

Drink is a great disinhibitor. The snag is that it disinhibits only the drinker. Once you are disinhibited to the point of declaring your love for barmaids/bus drivers/lampposts, we will be less than receptive to any more advances. If getting oiled is part of the night's fun, gauge it carefully so you are never drunker than we are. We do not want to be responsible for getting you home.

TANTRUMS

Losing your temper, particularly in public, shows a worrying lack of self-control. Shouting at people you don't know and who are not in a position to shout back (eg, waiting staff, juniors) is particularly unattractive, as is any degree of physical aggression.

SMOKING

If you smoke and we don't, we will mind the smell. We'll mind it on your clothes and your hair and we'll mind it even more on ours. Crucially, we will never want to slip between your malodorous sheets.

PATRONISING BEHAVIOUR

Modern women do not take well to being "corrected" in their dress, speech or opinions. You may see yourself as Pygmalion. We just see the pig.


... These people take themselves real serious and precious eh. Notice use of the Royal "we" and "us" in presumption that she speaks for others of her kind from a position of worthiness. Would anyone want to have such a disgusting bigot for a mother, sister, aunt, colleague, lover, wife, friend, mate etc, etc ?
22
Main / Niffongs Surrender
Aug 17, 2007, 02:33 AM
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0815071puppy1.html
Quote
AUGUST 15--In a pathetic end to the Mike Nifong saga, the disgraced North Carolina prosecutor who handled the Duke rape investigation has turned in his law license, noting that he never framed or displayed the document because it had been damaged "by a puppy in her chewing stage."

Additionally, in an August 7 letter to the North Carolina State Bar, Nifong noted that the law license also contained a misspelling of his middle name (which is Byron). A copy of Nifong's "the dog ate my law license" letter can be found below.

Nifong was stripped of his license as a result of his unethical stewardship of the Duke probe, which resulted in felony charges being dropped against three students who had been charged with the sexual assault of a stripper who had performed at a March 2006 off-campus party attended by members of the school's lacrosse team. (1 page)

But is the hatchet of widespread discrimination against men and their institutionalised civil violations to be burried with Niffong ONLY.


What about the hundreds and thousands of male lives deliberately destroyed by other professional men like niffong who as a rule, make a very good living predominantly abusing males in their professional capacity. That is lawyers, judges, polititians, rape center staffers, DV shelter staffers, community and DV police, family court tipstaff, counselors, and other adminstrators of the misandric dispensatrion.

YES WHAT ABOUT OTHER MEN WHO MAKE THEIR PROFESSIONAL WAY IN LIFE HURTING OTHER MEN AND BOYS SIMPLY FOR THIER MALENESS WHILST FEELING RESPECTABLE AND MIDDLE CLASS FOR IT. AFTERALL NIFFONG PRACTICED FOR 30 YEARS ?


http://www.abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=3289979&page=1
Quote
Mike Nifong has lost his law license and his seat as Durham County district attorney. And he could lose more than that in the months ahead.

Criminal charges are possible, and civil lawsuits are a virtual certainty for the disgraced former attorney.

Nifong, who brought charges against three Duke University lacrosse players, was disbarred Saturday for unethical conduct in his handling of the case. But attorneys for the falsely accused players say there's more in store, saying there are plans to file a motion this week asking Durham County Superior Court Judge Osmond Smith to consider additional punishment.

Smith presided over pretrial hearings in the Duke lacrosse case. As part of its decision to revoke his license, the North Carolina Bar found Nifong guilty of lying to Smith about the existence of exculpatory DNA evidence, evidence that he had not handed over to the defense in a clear report. The players' attorneys say Nifong buried information about unidentified male DNA found on the accuser's body and clothing in hundreds of pages of raw data.

In their motion defense, the attorneys plan to ask Smith for further sanctions against Nifong, punishment that could include fines and contempt of court. A ruling of contempt could come with jail time.

Nifong could also face lawsuits from the exonerated players and their families. Joe Cheshire, an attorney for former Duke lacrosse captain David Evans, one of the three exonerated players, said he expects "excessive civil action" against Nifong.

"Some people will take that as being mean-spirited and kicking somebody when they're down," Cheshire said Sunday to The Associated Press. "But we believe that this issue is enormously important and it carries significant precedent, and (the judge) ought to be the one to make that decision because it happened in his court."

The families are seeking an independent investigation into Nifong's conduct -- an inquiry that could determine whether he committed any criminal violations in prosecuting the Duke players. Prosecutors are normally immune from criminal charges, but attorneys for the lacrosse players say Nifong went beyond his role as a prosecutor by actively investigating the case alongside the Durham Police Department.


http://www.abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/Story?id=3289979&page=2
Quote
Requests for a federal investigation have also been made by several members of Congress, including Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., and Rep. Tom Feeney, R-Fla. The lawmakers believe Nifong violated the players' constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial.

Nifong accepted his punishment from the North Carolina Bar, saying that disbarment was an "appropriate" penalty for his actions and that he would waive any right to an appeal. Over the course of his five-day ethics hearing he admitted to making major mistakes during the case but said he did not do anything intentionally unethical. Instead, he cited his lack of experience with high-profile cases and said that he got "carried away" by the national press coverage the case.

Matt Heck, president of the National District Attorneys Association, told ABC News that disbarment for conduct during a specific prosecution is "very, very rare.'' He added that his organization "agrees with the North Carolina State Bar committee, its decisions and its conclusions.''

Still, Heck said that Nifong is living "a prosecutor's worst nightmare -- to think of prosecuting and convicting an innocent person.''

Nifong's disbarment ended his three-decade run as a Durham County prosecutor and a lifelong career as a public servant. Nifong was a social worker before getting his law degree and worked as an assistant district attorney.

As part of its decision, a Bar panel cited his years of service and lack of prior disciplinary issues as points in Nifong's favor. But ultimately the Bar found that there was no counterweight to Nifong's conduct on the Duke lacrosse case.

23
Study: 30% of mothers and 40% of fathers are abused during a pregnancy II

Abstract:
Using data on a nationally representative cohort of pregnant women in US cities, this study examines the prevalence and correlates of interpersonal violence (IPV) -- physical, emotional, and coercion-control -- during pregnancy and 1 year after birth. Overall, 33% of mothers and 40% of fathers experience some form of IPV during or after pregnancy. ... Violence during pregnancy strongly predicted violence after pregnancy.


In todays rotting and decadent society, wether a woman is pregnant or not, she is entitled as of right to leave any relationship. It is precisely because males are denied this very right of leaving relationships that an incresing measure of violence is observed in all their associations with women. That is irrespective of how pregnant, lazy, disbled or whatever such a woman is.

[ Nowadays even 30 years after the end of a relationship a man can still be held responsible for the food, drink, clothing and shelter of a depandant pig mascurading as an adult. But the bigger shame is on those other men in office who permit such an outrage on another fellow ]

Every-body understands the vigour and determination with which living things naturally seek to repel parasites, pathogens, leeches, bloodsukers and other unsybiotic hangers-on. Why is it that such understanding is witheld in the case of males who wish to remove themselves from worthless relationships.

[ Glenn Sacks pretended not to understand Darren Macks actions. But the man was only ridding himself, like other threatened living things, of a harmful pathogen, who on divorce, in turn owed him no responsibilities at all ]

http://www.leg.state.co.us/Clics/Clics2007A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/91BC854F552ACB8A87257251007B8843?Open&file=136_ren.pdf
24
Main / Mens Work
Apr 18, 2007, 11:50 PM
http://www.slate.com/id/2164268

Couch Entitlement

Surprise--men do just as much work as women do.
By Joel Waldfogel


Posted Monday, April 16, 2007, at 12:54 PM ET

Quote
Everyone from economists and sociologists to Oprah knows that women work more than men. Their longer combined hours, at the home and at the office, stop men from taking afternoon naps on the couch and cause fights that end with men spending nights on the couch. And yet according to new study, those longer hours are a myth, because it's just not true that women carry a heavier load. [But chauvenist societies as ours need misandric myths and sperstitions to maintain its bigoted world. Then again, so much order depends on widely accepted official lies anyway]

Throughout the world, men spend more time on market work, while women spend more time on homework [...No kidding ]. In the United States and other rich countries, men average 5.2 hours of market work a day and 2.7 hours of homework each day, while women average 3.4 hours of market work and 4.5 hours of homework per day. Adding these up, men work an average of 7.9 hours per day, while women work an average of--drum roll, please--7.9 hours per day. This is the first major finding of the new study. Whatever you may have heard on The View, when these economists accounted for market work and homework, men and women spent about the same amount of time each day working. The averages sound low because they include weekends and are based on a sample of adults that included stay-at-home parents as well as working ones, and other adults.


http://www.nber.org/papers/w13000

Total Work, Gender and Social Norms Michael Burda, Daniel S. Hamermesh, Philippe Weil

NBER Working Paper No. 13000
Issued in March 2007
NBER Program(s):   EFG    LS


---- Abstract -----

Quote
Using time-diary data from 25 countries, we demonstrate that there is a negative relationship between real GDP per capita and the female-male difference in total work time per day -- the sum of work for pay and work at home. In rich northern countries on four continents, including the United States, there is no difference -- men and women do the same amount of total work. This latter fact has been presented before by several sociologists for a few rich countries; but our survey results show that labor economists, macroeconomists, the general public and sociologists are unaware of it and instead believe that women perform more total work. [...Our propagander machine is just as efficient as our peoples are obstinately chauvenist?] The facts do not arise from gender differences in the price of time (as measured by market wages), as women's total work is further below men's where their relative wages are lower. Additional tests using U.S. and German data show that they do not arise from differences in marital bargaining, as gender equality is not associated with marital status; nor do they stem from family norms, since most of the variance in the gender total work difference is due to within-couple differences. We offer a theory of social norms to explain the facts. The social-norm explanation is better able to account for within-education group and within-region gender differences in total work being smaller than inter-group differences. It is consistent with evidence using the World Values Surveys that female total work is relatively greater than men's where both men and women believe that scarce jobs should be offered to men first.



25
Main / Pre-Fascism in Colorado
Mar 24, 2007, 10:26 PM
... According to the good men of Colorados State Legisative Assembly, protection from violence is to now presuppose an opportunity for the victims unjust enrichment by legalised theft and annexation of other peoples property.

Question is, are you really a victim or just the same old economically-lascivious pig of history, who likes to live well on the sweat, blood and efforts of others, that have chosen honest work over the parasitism you have opted for, as a means of self sustenance ?

You see victim, slavery was abolished hundreds of years ago and you need to get over it. Otherwise this overburdening of your men-folk will lead on to all sorts of altercations with others everywhere in their pursuit of more resources with which to quench your material lust and financial greed.

www.leg.state.co.us/Clics/Clics2007A/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/91BC854F552ACB8A87257251007B8843?Open&file=136_ren.pdf



SENATE 3rd Reading Unamended
March 8, 2007
SENATE Amended 2nd Reading
March 6, 2007
First Regular Session Sixty-sixth General Assembly
STATE OF COLORADO REENGROSSED
This Version Includes All Amendments Adopted in the House of Introduction LLS NO. 07-0254.01 Stephen Miller SENATE BILL 07-136 Senate Committees House Committees Judiciary


A BILL FOR AN ACT CONCERNING THE JURISDICTION OF COURTS TO ENTER ORDERS 101 FOR 102 THE PROTECTION OF PERSONS.

Bill Summary (Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not necessarily reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted.)

Clarifies the jurisdiction of courts to issue additional orders in civil protection order cases for the protection of persons concerning rent and mortgage payments, telephone and utility services, child care costs, temporary possession of personal property, and insurance. Requires a court issuing an order to specify how the order is to be administered, including how payments and property transfers are to be made.


Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado:SECTION 1. Legislative declaration. (1) The general assembly finds and declares that:

(a) Domestic violence is not limited to physical threats of violence and harm but includes financial control, document control, property control, and other types of control that make a victim more likely to return to an abuser due to fear of retaliation or inability to meet basic needs;

(b) Victims of domestic violence in many cases are unable to access resources to seek lasting safety options;

(c) These victims need the assistance of additional court orders to meet their emergency needs for food, shelter, medical care, and child care at the time they go to court for a civil protection order;

(d) These additional court orders are needed not only in cases that end in dissolution of marriage but also in cases in which reconciliation is appropriate, as well as in other cases; and

(e) Thirty-three states recognize existing legal obligations for support, payment, or ownership of personal or real property in order to protect victims in civil protection order cases.

SECTION 2. 13-14-102 (15), Colorado Revised Statutes, is amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW PARAGRAPH, to read:

Civil protection orders - legislative declaration.

A municipal court of record that is authorized by its municipal governing body to issue protection or restraining orders and any county court, in connection with issuing a civil protection order, shall have original concurrent jurisdiction with the district court to issue such additional orders as the municipal or county court deems necessary for the protection of persons. Such additional orders may include, but are not limited to:

(1)A TEMPORARY INJUNCTION THAT MAY BE ISSUED BY THE COURT THAT, UPON PERSONAL SERVICE OR UPON WAIVER AND ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE BY THE DEFENDANT, IS TO BE IN EFFECT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT FOR A PERIOD DETERMINED TO BE APPROPRIATE BY THE COURT, AND RESTRAINS THE DEFENDANT FROM CEASING TO MAKE PAYMENTS FOR MORTGAGE OR RENT, INSURANCE, UTILITIES, SERVICES, OR CHILD CARE WHEN THE DEFENDANT HAS A PRIOR EXISTING DUTY OR LEGAL OBLIGATION TO MAKE THE PAYMENTS, OR FROM TRANSFERRING, ENCUMBERING, CONCEALING, OR IN ANY WAY DISPOSING OF PERSONAL EFFECTS OR REAL PROPERTY, EXCEPT IN THE USUAL COURSE OF BUSINESS OR FOR THE NECESSITIES OF LIFE. THE RESTRAINED PARTY SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ACCOUNT TO THE COURT FOR ALL EXTRAORDINARY EXPENDITURES MADE AFTER THE INJUNCTION IS IN EFFECT. ANY INJUNCTION ISSUED SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED TWENTY DAYS AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMANENT CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER.

...
26
Main / Power and Social Degeneracy
Feb 12, 2007, 07:13 AM
Mother kept girls locked away from the world for seven years

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article1368918.ece


Quote

Three girls who were imprisoned by their mother in a house, of indescribable filth, for seven years, may never recover from the ordeal, experts said last night.

The girls were shut away from the outside world, existing in almost complete darkness, playing only with mice and communicating in their own language.
When they were discovered, their home in a smart, upper middle-class suburb had no running water and was filled with waste and excrement a metre high. The floor was corroded by mice urine.

...The girls' ordeal was apparently sparked by their parents' divorce, after which their mother, a 53-year-old lawyer, suffered a breakdown. But she won custody of the girls -- then aged 7, 11 and 13 -- and withdrew them from school ...


...Her husband, a local judge in Linz, Upper Austria, named only as Andreas M, was not allowed to see them once, despite his claims for access reaching court nine times.

... The mother was said to have been summoned to court nine times during the seven years after complaints by the father and neighbours, but officials never found a reason to investigate the case more closely.

...Waltraud Kubelka, a therapist who is now treating the three girls, said that their psychosocial and physical development was "catastrophic". "The oldest one is doing very badly and has no prospects of recovery. She was severely undernourished and practically anorexic after her release. The two younger ones will need years to come to terms with their horrific childhood.


This story is illustrative of the western democratic religion of womanism TB has tried to describe in earlier threads on social power. A secular religion closed to any other considerations other than of the womans', but with a view to the material advantage and enrichment of its advocates.

In this instance here, a womans insanity, mendacity, malice, dumbness, vindictiveness or plain inadequacy were overlooked ! For in the case of women in degenerate societies as ours, these vices are deemed irrelevant by womanists comprising its majority. Why?, because only by profiting the mother, by usurping fathers and children do they themselves get a valuable share, in matters giving effect to the womanist world view.  A world view in which an individuals merit or demerit never comes in for consideration.

On so many levels are others being violated and subject to ill-treatment as less human on account of these numerous and zealous womanists. And they see or care for no one else, but material advantages to themselves via women in every human question. That is matarial advntages as intermediated by the State wherin they outnunber others.

27
Main / Betraying Poor White Boys
Jan 16, 2007, 11:13 PM
System fails poor white boys

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8164-2547281.html

"WHITE poverty isn't sexy. And as a result, white boys from disadvantaged areas are missing out on funding that would help to tackle inequalities, teachers suggest...

British boys from poor white families perform worse than almost all other ethnic groups at GCSE level, according to figures from the Department for Education and Skills...

While 65 per cent of the poorest Chinese boys and 48 per cent of poor Indian and Bangladeshi boys gained five or more good GCSEs last year, only 24 per cent of poor white boys did so. The only group to perform worse than white British boys were those from a small number of traveller families, where the score was just 5 per cent..."


Can it be that the fathers of poor white boys alongside mothers forming the social majority happily accepted a society structured according to gender lines and not merit, providing this was only ever harmfull to others. But in so attempting an underhand benefit to advantage their daughters [whom were always privileged and never ever oppressed in the honest sense of the term] have seriously harmed their sons.?

Any cynic could second-guess the majority preferred solution as now positive discrimination going forward to favour poor white boys!!

'Tis a funny old game western democracy eh. Did anybody really ever beleive in freedom, justice or equality for all as against just for some ?