Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Arte Grey

16
Main / GPS panties
Jun 02, 2005, 08:07 PM
There's something perversely voyeuristic about this...  I'm glad this wasn't around when I was younger...  I always resented "Big Brother" tactics with my parents.  

Where was this stuff when the contract workers were being kidnapped and beheaded in Iraq??  Where's the male version of this??
17
Quote from: "LST"
Oh come on, you sarcastic assholes.
She even had to appear in court, she was stressed out so much, and she is already double-depressed. Give her a damn break.
She is cute and has breasts.
Hmm...  Feel free to go to the link on the picture and use it for your avi or sig... :D  :lol:
18
Main / Bail condition bars bride from altar
Jun 02, 2005, 04:59 AM
Evil Judge postpones DV couple's fast track to more DV and divorce; severely disrupting prospective bride's plans for divorce, potential alimony, or potential child support (long-term support).  This man probably doesn't know how lucky he is.

Obviously, the Catholic pre-marriage class missed something?  Do Catholics still do pre-wedding classes?:shock:
-------------------

http://www.unionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=55582

News - June 1, 2005

By PAT GROSSMITH, Union Leader Staff

MANCHESTER -- A woman, her head wrapped in gauze bandage, asked a Manchester District Court judge yesterday to eliminate a "no contact" bail condition so she and the man she allegedly assaulted can go ahead with their June wedding.

Stephanie A. Jaeger, 26, of 127 Pickering St., is charged with repeatedly punching Tim Szulc, of the same address, in the arms, shoulders and head. The assault is alleged to have happened about 2:25 a.m. Sunday. Jaeger pleaded not guilty yesterday.

Attorney David Horan said his client had no problem with other conditions of bail, i.e., that she possess no weapons, no excessive alcohol, no drugs. However, the "no contact" provision was problematic.

Under the bail condition, Jaeger is to have no contact with Szulc and not go within 100 yards of him.

Horan asked the judge to allow contact since "it could have horrific consequences on this young lady's wedding."

He said the wedding is planned for June 27 in St. Catherine Roman Catholic Church, and 150 guests are expected. It has been planned for some time.

"It's something Stephanie does not want to miss," Horan said.

Horan also said Szulc wants to have contact with his fiancee as well.

Police prosecuting officer Ronald Mello opposed any change in bail conditions.

He said he had not talked to Szulc and the state believes she poses a danger to him. He said the bail conditions should remain the same, at least for now.

Horan said Jaeger ended up in the hospital and had to have five stitches to close a head wound that caused massive bleeding.

Horan said his client fell down and suffered a gash to the top of her head.

Judge Norman Champagne asked if he were saying Jaeger had been assaulted, and Horan replied he was not prepared to say it was a case of self-defense.

"My client might have had too much to drink that particular evening," Horan said.

Horan asked the court if the "no contact" provision is not eliminated, to at least amend it so that a few days around the wedding date the couple could have contact.

Judge Champagne left the "no contact" provision in place. However, he said Jaeger could return to court at a later date to ask it be amended.

Her $500 personal recognizance bail was continued and a trial set for July 27.
19
http://www.nysun.com/article/14604

'Disposition' Emerges as Issue at Brooklyn College

BY JACOB GERSHMAN - Sun Staff Reporter  - May 31, 2005

Brooklyn College's School of Education has begun to base evaluations of aspiring teachers in part on their commitment to social justice, raising fears that the college is screening students for their political views.

The School of Education at the CUNY campus initiated last fall a new method of judging teacher candidates based on their "dispositions," a vogue in teacher training across the country that focuses on evaluating teachers' values, apart from their classroom performance.

Critics of the assessment policy warned that aspiring teachers are being judged on how closely their political views are aligned with their instructor's. Ultimately, they said, teacher candidates could be ousted from the School of Education if they are found to have the wrong dispositions.

"All of these buzz words don't seem to mean anything until you look and see how they're being implemented," a prominent history professor at Brooklyn College, Robert David Johnson, said. "Dispositions is an empty vessel that could be filled with any agenda you want," he said.

Critics such as Mr. Johnson say the dangers of the assessment policy became immediately apparent in the fall semester when several students filed complaints against an instructor who they said discriminated against them because of their political beliefs and "denounced white people as the oppressors."

Classroom clashes between the assistant professor, Priya Parmar, and one outspoken student led a sympathetic colleague of the instructor to conduct an informal investigation of the dispositions of the student, who the colleague said exhibited "aggressive and bullying behavior toward his professor." That student and another one were subsequently accused by the dean of the education school of plagiarism and were given lower grades as a result.

Brooklyn College, established in 1930, is a four-year school within the City University of New York. The college enrolls more than 15,000 students, and the School of Education has about 3,200, including 1,000 undergraduates.

Driving the new policies at the college and similar ones at other education schools is a mandate set forth by the largest accrediting agency of teacher education programs in America, the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education. That 51-year-old agency, composed of 33 professional associations, says it accredits 600 colleges of education - about half the country's total. Thirty-nine states have adopted or adapted the council's standards as their own, according to the agency.

In 2000 the council introduced new standards for accrediting education schools. Those standards incorporated the concept of dispositions, which the agency maintains ought to be measured, to sort out teachers who are likeliest to be successful. In a glossary, the council says dispositions "are guided by beliefs and attitudes related to values such as caring, fairness, honesty, responsibility, and social justice."

To drive home the notion that education schools ought to evaluate teacher candidates on such parameters as attitude toward social justice, the council issued a revision of its accrediting policies in 2002 in a Board of Examiners Update. It encouraged schools to tailor their assessments of dispositions to the schools' guiding principles, which are known in the field as "conceptual frameworks." The council's policies say that if an education school "has described its vision for teacher preparation as 'Teachers as agents of change' and has indicated that a commitment to social justice is one disposition it expects of teachers who can become agents of change, then it is expected that unit assessments include some measure of a candidate's commitment to social justice."

Brooklyn College's School of Education, which is the only academic unit at the college with the status of school, is among dozens of education schools across the country that incorporate the notion of "social justice" in their guiding principles. At Brooklyn, "social justice" is one of the four main principles in its conceptual framework. The school's conceptual framework states that it develops in its students "a deeper understanding of the quest for social justice." In its explanation of that mission, the school states: "We educate teacher candidates and other school personnel about issues of social injustice such as institutionalized racism, sexism, classism, and heterosexism."

Critics of the dispositions standard contend that the idea of "social justice," a term frequently employed in left-wing circles, is open to politicization.

"It's political correctness that has insinuated into the criteria for accreditation of teacher education institutions," a noted education theorist in New York, Diane Ravitch, said. "Once that becomes the criteria for institutions as a whole, it gives free rein to those who want to impose it in their classrooms," she said. Ms. Ravitch is the author of "The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn."

A case in point, as Mr. Johnson of Brooklyn College has pointed out, is the way in which the term was incorporated into Ms. Parmar's course, called Language Literacy in Secondary Education, which students said is required of all Brooklyn College education candidates who aspire to become secondary-school teachers. In the fall semester, Ms. Parmar was the only instructor who taught the course, according to students.

The course, which instructs students on how to develop lesson plans that teach literacy, is built around themes of "social justice," according to the syllabus, which was obtained by The New York Sun. One such theme is the idea that standard English is the language of oppressors while Ebonics, a term educators use to denote a dialect used by African-Americans, is the language of the oppressed.

A preface to the listed course requirements includes a quotation from a South African scholar, Njabulo Ndebele: "The need to maintain control over English by its native speakers has given birth to a policy of manipulative open-mindedness in which it is held that English belongs to all who use it provided that it is used correctly. This is the art of giving away the bride while insisting that she still belongs to you."

Among the complaints cited by students in letters they delivered in December to the dean of the School of Education, Deborah Shanley, is Ms. Parmar's alleged disapporval of students who defended the ability to speak grammatically correct English.

Speaking of Ms. Parmar, one student, Evan Goldwyn, wrote: "She repeatedly referred to English as a language of oppressors and in particular denounced white people as the oppressors. When offended students raised their hands to challenge Professor Parmar's assertion, they were ignored. Those students that disagreed with her were altogether denied the opportunity to speak."

Students also complained that Ms. Parmar dedicated a class period to the screening of an anti-Bush documentary by Michael Moore, "Fahrenheit 9/11," a week before last November's presidential election, and required students to attend the class even if they had already seen the film. Students said Ms. Parmar described "Fahrenheit 9/11" as an important film to see before they voted in the election.

"Most troubling of all," Mr. Goldwyn wrote, "she has insinuated that people who disagree with her views on issues such as Ebonics or Fahrenheit 911 should not become teachers."

Students who filed complaints with the dean said they have received no response from the college administration. Instead, they said, the administration and Ms. Parmar have retaliated against them, accusing Mr. Goldwyn and another student of plagiarism in January after the semester ended.

Ms. Parmar referred a reporter's inquiries to a spokeswoman for Brooklyn College. Linden Alschuler & Kaplan, Inc., a New York City public relations firm representing the CUNY school, later responded. The firm's Colleen Roche told the Sun that Ms. Shanley, dean of the education school, spoke with students about their complaints December 21.

Though students said Ms. Parmar did not inform them about the new dispositions assessment policy, an e-mail obtained by the Sun from one of Ms. Parmar's colleagues, Barbara Winslow, suggests that the aspiring teachers were in the process of being evaluated by the new standard.

Writing to three history professors, including Mr. Johnson, who had Mr. Goldwyn as their student, Ms. Winslow said the School of Education had "serious concerns about his disruptive behavior in the SOE classroom as well as aggressive and bullying behavior toward his professor outside the class."

She wrote: "The School of Ed is trying to be more systematic in looking at what educators call 'dispositions,' that is behaviors necessary for being a successful teacher in the public schools. Being able to do excellent academic work, does not always translate into being a thoughtful, self-reflective and effective teacher for youngsters."

In his reply to Ms. Winslow, Mr. Johnson wrote: "I'm very, very surprised to hear this. I have Evan in class again this term, and he is once again one of my best students - an active participant in class, unfailing courteous to the other students - basically, a real asset to the class in every way."

Another professor who received the e-mail, who asked not to be identified by name, said he told Ms. Winslow he had no complaints with Mr. Goldwyn.

The third professor did not respond to a reporter's inquiry.

Ms. Winslow, an assistant professor who also teaches at Brooklyn's Women's Studies Program, did not return calls seeking comment on her e-mail.

In his letter of complaint, Mr. Goldwyn defended his objections to Ms. Parmar's conduct in the classroom, writing, "While Ms. Parmar has an obligation to express her own views in the classroom, she is not entitled to penalize those students who disagree with her - especially on issues, such as those we have covered in this course, that are highly controversial."

Another student who submitted a letter to the dean called Ms. Parmar "an exceptional teacher" but said she alienated some students in the class. That student, Simon Tong, wrote: "Although I do believe in some of the teaching methods she has introduced, this does not change the fact that it has come at a cost. She felt it was necessary to expose this 'white power' but at the cost of offending those who were listening."

Speaking to the Sun, Mr. Tong defended Mr. Goldwyn's classroom behavior.

"Evan is not a bully," the student said. "He is able to voice his opinion. He is very vocal about his opinions."

The plagiarism accusations against Mr. Goldwyn and the other student involved their final assignment for Ms. Parmar's course, which required them to develop a "critical literacy" lesson plan intended for "linguistically and culturally diverse students."

Mr. Goldwyn, according to those familiar with the academic charges against him, was accused of failing to attribute a question he used in his lesson plan that was paraphrased from a Web site.

The other undergraduate, Christina Harned, a senior who expects to graduate in December, was charged with plagiarism for submitting a definition of Jim Crow laws in her lesson plan that she acknowledged she copied from the online Encarta encyclopedia. She said she was not aware before handing in the assignment that using the definition constituted plagiarism. "It wasn't a term paper," she said. "It was a lesson plan."

Brooklyn College insists that the charges of plagiarism had nothing to do with the students' complaints about Ms. Parmar.

"The claim that the allegations of plagiarism were retaliatory is baseless," Ms. Roche said.

In January, the two students met with Brooklyn College's dean of undergraduate studies, Ellen Belton, and were instructed to redo the assignments. Both students' final grades for the course were lowered by at least one letter grade, according to the students. Ms. Harned, who says she has a cumulative B-minus grade-point average, received a C-minus for the course, and she said Mr. Goldwyn ended up with a D-minus. He could not be reached for confirmation.

Four students, Ms. Harned said, dropped out of Ms. Parmar's course during the semester. One of the students was a former mechanic from Bay Ridge, Scott Madden, who said he wanted to become a teacher because "I like explaining things."

Mr. Madden, 35, said that after he disputed a grade he received from her, Ms. Parmar encouraged him to withdraw from the course. He said he changed his plans to take the course in the summer after finding out that Ms. Parmar was again teaching both sections of the required course.

"Basically, she's a socialist, she's racist against white people," Mr. Madden said. "If you want to pass that class you better keep your mouth shut."

In an interview with the Sun, Ms. Harned said she dropped out of the School of Education and switched her major to political science because of her experience in Ms. Parmar's course.

"I'm blacklisted," she said. "How am I supposed to move forward in a department I'm not comfortable in?"

That is the point of the new format, critics of the dispositions standard said.

"In its most pernicious form, then, dispositions theory is a tool for education schools to ensure that the next generation of public school students is educated solely by those teachers who have accepted the kind of extremist beliefs articulated by Professor Parmar," Mr. Johnson wrote.

The national accreditation council conducted the School of Education's accreditation review during the past academic year. The school reported to the council that it "has adopted an assessment of dispositions rubric as a result of a Fall 2004 pilot of the instrument."

"This assessment has been implemented across the unit's programs in Spring 2005," the report said.

Ms. Roche, of Linden Alschuler, said last week that the "assessment of dispositions rubric" remained in draft form and could not be released to the press.

The report to the council stated that teacher candidates will "self-evaluate and faculty will evaluate the candidates on 8 dispositions at mid-semester and at the end of the semester." Those who perform poorly in the assessment are given "counseling."

"Candidates who do not meet academic standards and candidates who do not demonstrate acceptable performance after such counseling will be counseled out of programs," the report stated.

An assistant dean at the School of Education, Peter Taubman, said there is "no punitive effect" on students for a low mark on dispositions.

Other education schools contacted by the Sun that have adopted the dispositions criterion have used it during their application processes.

A faculty member at the Master in Teaching Program at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., Michael Vavrus, said its admissions process asks applicants how they would decrease inequities in education. "A wrong answer might be someone with clearly a racial bias," he said. Students who don't provide sufficient answers would receive "conditional admission at best," he said.

Officials of the national accreditation council said it provides a guide for teacher education schools but relies on the individual schools to develop their own specific definitions of dispositions. The president of the council, Arthur Wise, told the Sun that dispositions "deals with the softer side of teaching."

"It recognizes the fact that a person may have content knowledge, may well understand pedagogy and may be able to use it effectively on command," Mr. Wise said. "But the question is: How does the individual relate to children both individually and collectively?"

Advocates of the dispositions criterion say it is rooted in the psychological tests developed early in the last century by an American psychologist, Edward Thorndike, and compare it to personality tests that corporations often give to job candidates. Dispositions became more widely accepted in the last 20 years as educators sought to find ways to tackle teacher shortages and high teacher dropout rates, particularly in urban areas.

In recent years, advocates of multicultural education have seized on the concept of dispositions as a way to influence teachers' attitudes toward diversity and social justice. In a May 2004 essay in the Journal of Teacher Education, a professor at Western Michigan University's College of Education, Arthur Garmon, wrote that dispositions, such as "openness, self-awareness/self-reflectiveness, and commitment to social justice," may be "important predictors of how likely preservice teachers are to develop greater multicultural awareness and sensitivity during their preparation program."

A professor emerita at California State University Monterey Bay, Christine Sleeter, suggested in a March 2001 essay in the Journal of Teacher Education titled "Preparing Teachers for Culturally Diverse Schools: Research and the Overwhelming Presence of Whiteness" that education schools could "alter the mix of who becomes teachers" by recruiting and selecting "only those who bring experiences, knowledge, and dispositions that will enable them to teach well in culturally diverse urban schools."

Officials of the accreditation council said their policy on dispositions was heavily influenced by a consortium of state education agencies in 34 states, the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. In 1992, the body drafted a report containing model standards for licensing new teachers that included the idea of dispositions. The chairwoman of the drafting committee, Linda Darling-Hammond, is a leading advocate of multicultural education and the author of the book "Learning To Teach for Social Justice."

For critics of using dispositions as a tool of evaluating teacher candidates, the connection between multicultural educators and the accreditation council has a strong influence over the way the notion of social justice is defined.

In an e-mail to the Sun, a senior fellow at the Lexington Institute in Virginia, Robert Holland, said: "The tight link between the accreditors and the multiculturalists indicates that social justice is being defined by those who despise the very ideal of an American common culture - considering it irredeemably racist, sexist, homophobic, etc."

The Brooklyn College School of Education was awarded its accreditation.
20
It's a good example of attempted aquaintance rape with the stereotypical genders reversed...
http://standyourground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5570
Smoking Gun Link (with police report)
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0526051texas1.html
21
Main / Alfred Kinsey - A scientific fraud?
Jun 01, 2005, 10:58 AM
Kinsey's "researchers" observed the sexual torture of children of all ages, down to 5 months.  The so called "orgams" they recorded in these hideous criminal acts included hysterical crying, screams, and even convulsions. Kinsey & Ebert, At the Movies (Link), by Arlen Williams
Quote
"Torture."  That gets to another point.  Characteristically missing in Ebert's defense of the Hoosier Prof. is the mention of what heart-rending evil his "research" included.  It wasn't just about answering the questions,  "What do you do, when you're alone?" and "What do you mean by 'kiss?'"

Kinsey's "Table 34" features exacting data on the sexual abuse of children --down to age 5 months.  "Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal 'child sexuality.'" Explaining further, Kupelian relates:

For example, "Table 34" on page 180 of Kinsey's "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male" claims to be a "scientific" record of "multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males." Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for "orgasm" by Kinsey's "technically trained" aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 "orgasms." Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child "data" to prove children's need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via "safe-sex" education. These data are also regularly used to "prove" children are sexual from birth.


Selling sex in the U.S.A. (Link) is also worth a look...

Did anyone here actually bother with the Kinsey movie?
22
Main / Oh, the sweet irony
Jun 01, 2005, 06:18 AM
Quote from: "The Biscuit Queen"
I agree, I will be on him every time he says something like this. Why? Because we all get painted with his brush. Someone like him starts spouting off, and who do you think gets quoted as spokeman for MRAs? Assault? Bluegrass? Dr E? No, it will be good ol' Bob.  Making us all look like a bunch of woman hating idiots banging our clubs and grunting and trying to drag our women into a cave by their hair.

I think that the MRA movement deserves to be taken seriously, it NEEDS to be taken seriously. Crap like "all women cheat" just sets us back and makes our job even harder. It also is NO DIFFERENT than feminists. Feminists paint all men with the same brush, they do not fight ideas, they fight people.

Bob wants to fight people, mainly women. How is this going to make anything better, other than to switch which side is on top. I think most of us want to fight ideas, mainly the inequities and gender bias, the social manipulation, the destruction of men. Women are not the enemy, these ideas are.

If we are to keep the MRA movement from getting highjacked like feminism was, we need to be diligent in standing separate from extremists.
Amen, BQ!  i couldn't have said it better.
23
Main / NAvy Blue Melts Down MND again
Jun 01, 2005, 05:57 AM
Mike's blog linked to MND Front Page...

MND on the Brain - Sunday, May 29, 2005
Part 1: I am Not Conservative

Part  2: Paradigm Shifts -  Sunday, May 29, 2005
Mike discusses controversy around a Max Ross piece. On the Sadly, No! site Mike refers to, the MND commentary was 5/27/05, and consists of links back to MND, an op-ed written by Max Ross, and a Sadly, No! and other commentaries on the Max Ross piece.

Max Ross does a follow-up piece to explain himself,  On 'Consensual Non-Consent,' Part 2

Part 3: Misogyny at MND? -  Monday, May 30, 2005

At the MND Forum -
Some of the more dedicated members at MND seem to be taking a leap of faith and resuming regular posting to revive the other forum sections.  Could the forum survive without moderation?
24
Main / Looking for Floridians
May 30, 2005, 08:31 PM
Do you by any chance post at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/f4jusa/ (forum)?  You might reach some Florida dads there.  Concerning  groups @ yahoo (if you join), Apparently receiving posts as "Individual emails" is a default setting for all Yahoo groups. If you don't want to be drowned by e-mail, edit your membership and check off one of the other options.
25
Main / No jail for 'lamb chop' woman
May 30, 2005, 05:39 PM
Outrageous female criminals! :shock:

http://www.vvdailypress.com/2005/111573084054192.html

Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Bra strangler sentenced to 25 to life
By GARY GEORGE/Staff Writer

VICTORVILLE (CA) -- A woman who strangled a friend with her bra when she discovered he had taken one of her undergarments has been sentenced to 25 years to life in prison.

Karen Denise Chades was drinking and dancing with 67-year-old Sesario "Rocky" Roque, a friend and neighbor, in his garage after a party on Sept. 24, 2002, when she discovered that Roque had one of her bras.

Enraged, Chades attacked Roque with a broom, knocking back two of the victim's teeth. She then strangled him with the bra, jurors found.

Deputies arrested Chades in August 2003, at her home in the 12200 block of San Dimas Street in connection with Roque's death.

Deputy District Attorney John Thomas argued during the trial that Chades deliberately and with premeditation strangled Roque.

Her defense attorney argued that Chades had acted in self-defense.

The jury didn't believe her story that Roque, who had a blood-alcohol level of 0.29, had tried to sexually assault her.

Chades, who was 40 years old when convicted on June 8, was sentenced on April 29 after she was denied a new trial.
26
I saw The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, and it was a funny and amusing film. Even though I haven't read the book for which this film was based on, I still enjoyed watching this film. For beginners, I loved the opening sequence of the film featuring the dolphins singing the dolphins' song. Also, I loved the character of Marvin the depressed robot. He was a absolute laughing riot of the film. In addition, the film's special effects and settings were good as well as the film's solid cast.

Maybe I'll get around to the book...
27
http://remotefarm.techcentralstation.com/052705D.html

Why the Runaway Bride Matters
By Lee Harris,     Published   05/27/2005

Jennifer Wilbanks, the notorious runaway bride of Duluth, Georgia, was indicted Wednesday on two charges of lying to the police, and could face up to six years in prison. Some, no doubt, will find these indictments to be overly harsh. After all, can't a girl change her mind? Other prospective brides have been known to get cold feet before their weddings, so why should Ms. Wilbanks be so signally punished? Besides, her lying to the police was just the frantic response of a woman caught in an embarrassing pickle -- though a pickle of her own making. Who could blame her for wishing to shift the blame to someone else?

In fact, Jennifer Wilbanks' real crime is not that she lied to the police, but that she betrayed the trust of her community -- a community that had gone into a state of red alert virtually the moment they discovered that she had not returned from her afternoon jog. Instead of waiting around to see if Wilbanks showed up in a couple of days, the citizens of her small town instantly sprang into action. By the next morning scattered patrols of concerned volunteers began to make exhaustive sweeps of their hometown, looking under each azalea bush and ferreting through people's petunias in search of the slightest clue that could help solve the mystery of Jennifer Wilbanks' apparently inexplicable disappearance.

Later, when it was discovered that Wilbanks had taken a bus to Las Vegas, and that she had told whoppers to the police about being abducted and sexually abused by a Latino man and his white female accomplice in a blue van, the town of Duluth became very angry at Wilbanks. Though some of her neighbors defended her, the judgment of most was harsh and unforgiving.

Upon hearing about the unsympathetic local reaction to the saga of the runaway bride, the Los Angeles Times decided to call Duluth "a town without pity" in their byline on the story.

Okay, Los Angeles. You hear that a woman has not come back from her jog. Do you at once all begin calling each other on the phone, and arranging sweep searches in your neighborhood, or do you think, "Why should I worry? She's probably in Vegas by now."

Of course, the cynical LA response would have been right in the case of Jennifer Wilbanks. But Duluth has not yet learned the reflexive cynicism of a place like LA. In Duluth, when a woman disappears while jogging, only days before her wedding, foul play is automatically suspected -- and it is suspected because everyone thinks the same thought, "She wouldn't have disappeared without telling anyone. She wouldn't have been that utterly thoughtless and inconsiderate of those around her, either in the little circle of her family and friends, or the larger circle of her community."

That is why, instead of sitting around to see if she showed up sooner or later, the community of Duluth immediately began looking for her -- because the people there believed that Jennifer Wilbanks was not the kind of person who would just run off for no good reason. They all thought that she was like them in this respect.

In short, they trusted her, by which I mean they assumed that she would naturally follow the same rules of interpersonal thoughtfulness that they followed themselves in their own lives, one of which was that you just don't vanish into thin air without telling the people who love and care about you, and who are bound to go frantic if you don't show up when you are expected to.

It wasn't that the community of Duluth had a problem with women getting cold feet over an impending wedding; it was that they expected their neighbors to deal with this problem in a manner that wouldn't draw the attention of the entire nation and set their own lives and neighborhood in an uproar. That is why it is wrong to excuse Wilbanks by saying "We all make mistakes." Communities like Duluth can be extraordinarily compassionate to mistake-makers. If Wilbanks had just had a decent nervous breakdown, like other people, then her neighbors would have sent her flowers in the hospital and held her hand until she was feeling saner. But she didn't handle it this way, and the way she did handle it had the effect of diminishing the trustfulness of the community that had treated her like a good neighbor.

Jennifer Wilbanks committed the supreme societal sin: she has damaged the trust system of her community. By her own irresponsibility, she has made her neighbors less likely to respond the same way the next time one of them goes missing. The thought will occur to them, "Well, we don't have to start looking for her tonight. We can wait a couple of days. After all, she might turn out to be another runaway bride."

This is The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf effect: By abusing people's willingness to respond to emergencies, you make them less likely to respond to them at all. If, tomorrow, another woman failed to return from her jog, would squads of volunteers turn up the very next day, prepared to search for her? Or would they chuckle and say, "Looks like another runaway bride to me."

Naturally trustful people must never be given a good reason to become cynical, for cynicism is the enemy of every honor system. It whispers in our ear that other people break the rules with impunity -- so why can't we do the same thing. All of us are really skunks, so why be a patsy and act like a Boy Scout?

American trustfulness has eroded drastically since the nineteen fifties when no one ever locked their door in my neighborhood. We have been taught to see the worst in people, and to expect them to be motivated by the lowest possible impulses. Cases like the runaway bride do nothing to reverse this fatal tendency. And that is why the people of Duluth have every right not only to shame, but to punish Jennifer Wilbanks for so grossly violating the spirit of trustfulness that is perhaps the most precious asset of any community.

Lee Harris is author of Civilization and Its Enemies.
28
Who didn't see this coming??  Not only will parents have to wonder about LUG (lesbian until graduation), sex changes will be glorified...  Wonder if any of the "GLBT classes" (disguised as women's studies or sociology) will make this required viewing?  I noted they didn't say how many men vs women in the group or which way they were changing.  I don't have cable, so will probably not know when it actually airs unless there is another story.

http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewCulture.asp?Page=\\Culture\\archive\\200505\\CUL20050525b.html
Quote
Monisha Bansal, CNSNews.com Correspondent, May 25, 2005

(CNSNews.com) - A new cable reality show will follow college students through their sex change operations.

"TransGenerations" is scheduled to premier Sept. 20 on the Sundance Channel in partnership with Logo, a new Viacom network aimed at homosexuals. The eight-week series will document the sex changes of four college students, one each at Smith College, Michigan State University, the University of Colorado and California State University, according to the entertainment tabloid Variety.

According to the Sundance Channel, the show seeks to capture the students' setbacks and triumphs as they deal with their academics, campus life, and family reactions to their decision to have the sex change.

"This series is a moving portrait of four fascinating people at a dramatic time in their lives. 'TransGenerations' also offers an engaging first-hand look at the current trend on college campuses of confronting gender issues and politics head-on," said Laura Michalchyshyn, executive vice president for programming and marketing at the Sundance Channel.

Denise Leclair, executive director of the International Foundation for Gender Education, added that she hopes "this show breaks down some barriers for the transgender community."

Any exposure, Leclair said, is helpful. "There is a lack of visible role models, and the transition is a difficult thing, especially for younger people," she said.

Regina Griggs, executive director of Parents and Friends of ExGays and Gays, criticized the effort to increase the public's familiarity with the transgender lifestyle.

"They are trying to make people think it is okay to change who they are because of who they feel they should be," said Griggs. "They are ruining their lives."

"TransGenerations" is produced by World of Wonders Productions, which plans an advanced screening of the show at the Castro Theater in San Francisco on June 23. Executive producers Fenton Bailey and Randy Barbato also produced "Inside Deep Throat" earlier this year, the documentary about the making of the 1972 pornographic movie starring Linda Lovelace and Harry Reems.

"TransGenerations" will air Tuesday nights at 9 p.m. on the Sundance Channel and again in 2006 on Logo.
29
Quote from: "Bobx23456"
Quote from: "Bilbo"
Another page from the double standards feminist textbook.

http://www.nationalreview.com/script/printpage.asp?ref=/comment/sommers200505020808.asp

Quote

Why Can't They "Just Get Along"?
V-Day meets P-Day on campus.

By Christina Hoff Sommers

Warning:The following contains adult (in this case, collegiate) language, along with gratuitous references to male and female genitalia.

College administrators have been enthusiastic supporters Eve [/i]
I tried to follow the link and got nowhere.  The National Review does not list Sommers as one of their authors on it's "search" page.  Is this for real?  Bob

Catch more of The World according to Bob at:  http://bobstruth.blogspot.com/
Yes, it was for real... I was there just a couple of days ago, but just now got an error message.  I Googled the article title and got these links that work...
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/sommers200505020808.asp
http://www.aei.org/publications/filter.all,pubID.22431/pub_detail.asp

Check out the student site too...
http://www.rwucr.com/testaclese/monologues.htm
Pictures of the confrontation with college staff...
http://rwucr.com/ipw-web/gallery/album09

Anybody need a new avatar?? :shock: :D  :lol:
http://www.rwucr.com/testaclese/promos.htm
30
Main / Angry mother moons school official
May 29, 2005, 08:38 AM
Ok, I read this first because I needed the laugh (easily amused).  Indecent exposure is probably a misdemeanor, isn't it.  There will probably be arguments on the motivation (power play/shock vs sexual assault).  For instance, exposing oneself to children and taking reaction pictures to later use in pornography is more of a sexual assault.  I think its fair to go ahead and charge with all 3.  They'll probably barter down the charges in court anyway.  I don't see the sex offender registration, unless they can prove the motivation was sexual.  But this woman should not make a habit of this.