Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - davis2ab
751
War is the ultimate chivalry.
Man fights for his wife and children (also, the farm or business that supports them).
Single man fights for the right to have a wife and child in the future (also, a farm or business to support them).
It is the ultimate expression of men protecting and supporting women and children.
Women have rejected chivalry. They openly state they don't need men. They openly state they are independent. Most, damning, their actions are consistent with their words. Men are disposable and are treated accordingly.
Men never claim not to need women. Men know they need women, but they sometimes make the choice that the cost exceeds te benefit.
If men are just tending to their own amusements whether hunting, fishing, or whatever, men have little motivation to fight.
Men in a very real sense have nothing to fight for -- they could fight for their abstract "freedom" I suppose. But, I suppose many men would feel more "free" with the over throw of their oppressors (the current government including child support collectors, etc.)
Another view of things is a little different. Men don't fight to protect women and children. They fight to possess them. The enemy would come into town and take the women. Women are the prize going to the victor. I think this view is irrelevant, now, The enemy wouldn't want our women. The enemy nstead of killing the men and keeping the women would just kiill both and keep all the SUVs.
752
I was talking to a friend (woman). She had attended a speaking event by Jay Leno's wife. She was bragging about going back stage and meeting Mrs. Leno.
I asked the topic of the speech. The topic had something to do with the mistreatment of women in India.
I laughed and made some comments about how according to what I have heard it is men in India who are getting mistreated, etc.
I then started talking about how men in America are mistreated.
I gave the example of how the guy gets arrested when his wife is having an affair. How she uses feigned abuse to have him arrested so her boyfriend can immediately moved in. How if you even look at a woman wrong you get arrested, etc.
Did she contest any of these things? No, her response was "not all women are like that."
I am so sick of hearing those words.
You know, it doesn't even matter if all women are like that. It only takes one to ruin your day (actually, life).
Besides, if the law permits that, it puts you at the mercy of the woman's good graces.
In any event, I don't know much about Mrs. Leno (actually nothing), but maybe she should mind her own business.
I am already feeling sorry for the guys of India. God help them.
753
If a man removes, his clothes he goes to prison and put on the sex offender list for life (at least where I am).
The point is that women not men have a greater to nudity.
If a woman is topless, she more than likely is told to put her top back on. She is not criminalized for life.
754
I am not sure I am completely with you'll on this one.
I agree biology is of absolute importance if there is no established parent child bond.
I am not sure it is of the same importance when there is one.
If the child and man have established a substantial parent child bond the biology should probably be ignored.
My first child is a dead ringer for me. The second one less so and the third one also less so.
Are the second two mine? I know my wife started cheating at some point but not the exact point.
I don't think I want to know right now. I don't think it matters and shouldn't matter at this point.
755
Police sometimes have a strange conception of consent. I have heard on Treasury Officer testify that the young man "consented" to give a "voluntary" statement. The officer had knocked on his door in the wee hours of the morning, taken him from his home to the police station for questioning, had no way to return home, etc. Many people do not feel comfortable telling a police officer "no" or don't even know that they have this right.
Regardless, my biggest issue with this is turning parent against child, husband against wife, child against parent, etc. I just don't think the police should be trying to "divide" and conquer with family units. The family should be a unit. A family is never the same again after the police get involved.
Absent, a significant crime between family members (more than just an argument, etc.) the police should stay out of it. Just my opinion.
756
Yes on all counts. Yes, I meant he not "you."
Sorry. Yes, he has hopes. Yes, no matter how unrealistic, he is motivated by his hopes. But, I hope you don't mind a personal attack -- just one exception to the rules -- he is a loser, loser, loser, loser!!!!
757
Biden's presendial hopes?
You got to be kidding.
He has no presidential hopes.
He is a loser and he will never be president.
The women's groups don't like him. He is just a loser that they are using.
You is a joke, and the people of this country will never elect him president.
I think the polls bear this out. I have seen him way down near the bottom.
758
I am rather vocal about my opinions.
It seems to me that no one looks at me like I am crazy anymore.
Even the feminist types don't.
