Gynocentrism Sucks
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I like your new picture, Typhonblue. You look kind of mysterious.
Hey thanks.
It's the absense of the touque.
are you a hot chick?
Wow. Proof again...
proof of what?
mmmm, she's hawt! your girlfriend? lucky dog, you!
i think rusty has been shrooming too much. typhon i can't tell if you're male or female, but you're still hot in it.
Right now my avatar is a sphinx cat.
It bears no resemblance to me aside from the large ears and hairlessness.
look , Ive stopped with the personal insults of my own accord
I suggest you do the same
Here...do some youtubing...
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fag+hag&search_type=
Each and every one produced by gays....you really should do some work on expanding your venacular vocabulary before you accuse people of things.
Here...do some youtubing...
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=fag+hag&search_type=
Each and every one produced by gays....you really should do some work on expanding your venacular vocabulary before you accuse people of things.
who said i wasn't concerned for the men? if a friend, brother, son, or husband of mine were falsely accused i'd be livid
How about for just regular old injustice? Like let's say you had a friend who had a "worthless" husband, and couldn't find any other way to arrange so he couldn't see his kids....
you lost me on that last part
Sheesh, are you serious? Ok, let me explain: The female friend of yours has a "worthless" husband who she wants to get rid of, but the only way she can find to do so is to file a false allegation of rape against him.
Get it now?
no. he used a homophobic slur and i called him out on it, then he tries to cover his ass by implying he MIGHT be gay. fucking lame.
I think any gay man with brains can see you're no friend to men and since gay men are still men--despite feminism's insistance that they are actually women--they can probably make the logical connection that you are no friend to gay men either.
Fag hag is a slur on women.
you threw the first stone FIB...............................after that anything goes
Quotehahahaha
These are the adults responsible for leading by example.
Very sobering.
who are you, the moral police? stfu
Have you ever considered that your penchant for conflict may have something to do with the extreme situations in your personal life?
oh, i've always been feisty. i'm irish
I'm Irish too -- almost 100%.
You know, the Irish are much better known for our verbal abilities than for simply rattling off childish rantings. If you're so proud of your Irish roots, you should consider that, rather than behaving like the shanty Irish who drink green beer and never read Joyce.
Really -- you should go back and read your posts. You sound like a spoiled 14 year old.
so you reply with more name calling
now who is the dumbass FIB?
i'm gay! great excuse
For not being a homophobe?
Well... I really think that's being a bit disingenous there...
I mean, he could be gay and a homophobe, but at that point I think he's the one who suffers most so it sort of renders the whole issue mute.
look whore, I didnt start shit with you.......................you called me out of my name and I didnt even respond.........................then you insulted me again
but I might do like willie D and just let a hoe be a hoe
Quote...and there are mothers in prison who don't get favors, EITHER.
Hogwash! You don't know what you're talking about. In my state of California (and that is still a part of America) women prisoners routinely, under color of law, get favors men prisoners don't get. The misandrist State of California is currently being sued for denying male prisoners parenting services they are abundantly giving to women prisoners. Just read the part in bold if this is too lengthy a reading assignment for you:QuoteIn CDC's responses to First Set of Request for Admissions, CDC admits:[26]
· "Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9 employ gender classifications" (at 6:10-15);
· "Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9 allow women but not men to participate in the program established by said statutes" (at 6:17-26);
· "You implement Penal Code Sections 1147 through 1174.9 according to the gender classifications therein" (at 6:28-7:7);
· "In your implementation of Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9, you allow women to participate in the program established therein" (at 7:8-18);
· "In your implementation of Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9, you do not allow men to participate in the programs established therein" (at 7:20-27);
· "A parenting woman with an established history of substance abuse who has one or more children under six years old can meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 3:23-4:1);
· "A parenting man with an established history of substance abuse who has one or more children under six years old cannot meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 4:3-7);
· "Women can meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 4:9-14);
· "Men cannot meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 4:16-19);
· "Currently, there are women participating in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 4:26-5:2);
· "Currently there are women who meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9" (at 5:4-11);
· "Currently, there are no men who meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424, because said statutes require that a person be a woman in order to participate in said program" (at 5:20-26);
· "In determining who is eligible to participate in the program established by Penal Code Sections 1174 through 1174.9, you consider women but not men, because said statutes only provide a program for women but not for men" (at 5:28-6:;
· "Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424 employ gender classifications" (at 11:1-7);
· "Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424 allow women but not men to participate in the program established by said statutes" (at 11:9-18);
· "You implement Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424 according to the gender classifications therein" (at 11:20-27);
· "In your implementation of Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424, you allow women to participate in the program established therein" (at 12:1-12);
· "In your implementation of Penal Code Sections 3410 through 34324, you do not allow men to participate in the program established therein" (at 12:13-24);
· "A parenting women with an established history of substance abuse who has one or more children under six years old can meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424" (at 8:14-20);
· "A parenting man with an established history of substance abuse who has one or more children under six years old cannot meet the criteria for participation in the
program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424" (at 8:22-26);
· "Women can meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424" (at 8:28-9:5);
· "Men cannot meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424" (at 9:7-10);
· "Currently, there are no men who meet the criteria for participation in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424, because said statutes require that a person be a women in order to participate in said program" (at 10:11-17); and
· "In determining who is eligible to participate in the program established by Penal Code Sections 3410 through 3424, you consider women but not men, because said statutes only provide a program for women but not for men" (at 10:19-27).
(Emphasis added.)
Therefore, California and CDC admit they implement said statutes according to the gender classifications therein, i.e., in a gender-discriminatory manner. Said classifications are presumed invalid and subject to strict scrutiny, and California and CDC must prove the classifications, and their implementation of the same, meet strict scrutiny. Respondents cannot meet this burden.
homophobes in here, i see.
she has every right to sue that man
How do you know I'm not gay?.....propaganda enters ear....brain atrophies...knee jerks...
