Your second link is of a very biased view.
It could be the way this editorial made it out to be, or it could be his dad was molesting him and he stuck back.
Myabe you should ask the kid instead of decidng for yourself based on what you want this reality to be.
Why. Because it is Glenn Sacks? Did you even read the damned article?
To whit:
"....he had been through a very contentious divorce with his ex-wife, Deborah Geisler, who had made allegations of physical and sexual abuse. Those abuse allegations had been proven false by several police departments, CPS, and a voluntary lie detector test taken by Dr. Lohstroh. "
What part of this paragraph is difficult for you to read? Cripes! Even the fucking anti-father organization, CPS, say she was lying and nothing ever happened. In true feminist form, the rose colored glassed remain on.
Furthermore, you have shown you true colors once again Devia. To even imply that this man DID molested this child is beyond reprehension. You are no better than this false accusing mother... pathetic.
TMOTS