Hello Sir Jessy
I told the missus that if that was my daughter and wife, my scope would not hesitate and that bullet would kill the general AND his daughter. Possibly just the daughter, so that the general could live in great fear.
And, if I was that guy, in that movie, well; my enemies would know that about me.
Yep; I'm afraid that sometimes you have to go over the top yourself in order to protect what you care about.
And, in my view, if the law treats people horribly, then the upholders of that law are **responsible** for that mistreatment.
Now, we all know that laws sometimes do mistreat people, usually for the 'greater good', but the anti male laws that we are mostly concerned about differ from most of these in a number of respects.
1. They are purposely sex-discriminatory.
2. The injustices they inflict are often not trivial. They are often very long-term and very serious indeed.
3. Many of these laws actually **encourage** further injustices to take place.
4. Where injustices occur as a result of the law, there is usually some attempt to ameliorate them in some way. But when it comes to laws that hurt men, the politicians often do the very opposite. They willfully set out to make the situation worse. In the case of paternity fraud, for example, the injustice to a man that follows from being cheated through paternity fraud is actually buttressed, magnified and perpetuated by a law that requires him to pay, long term, for someone else's children!
And, as per 3. above, paternity fraud is actively encouraged by such a law.
5. Anti-male laws have definitely got nothing to do with the 'greater good'.
I think that most of us are prepared to put up with laws that 'oppress' us in some relatively minor way so that others might be protected, but the laws that relate to gender issues have gone way beyond this point. They are not there to protect women and children but to allow women and others to pulverise men - and only men - at their convenience.
