Share the Wealth... Hillary at work.

[Mr. X]

http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/070529/clinton_economy.html?.v=1

We Are All in It Together, Clinton Says
Tuesday May 29, 12:11 pm ET
By Holly Ramer, Associated Press Writer 
Clinton: Shared Prosperity Should Replace 'On Your Own' Society


MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) -- Presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton outlined a broad economic vision Tuesday, saying it's time to replace an "on your own" society with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.
ADVERTISEMENT


The Democratic senator said what the Bush administration touts as an "ownership society" really is an "on your own" society that has widened the gap between rich and poor.

"I prefer a 'we're all in it together' society," she said. "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

That means pairing growth with fairness, she said, to ensure that the middle-class succeeds in the global economy, not just corporate CEOs.

"There is no greater force for economic growth than free markets. But markets work best with rules that promote our values, protect our workers and give all people a chance to succeed," she said. "Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies."

Clinton spoke at the Manchester School of Technology, which trains high school students for careers in the construction, automotive, graphic arts and other industries. The school highlighted one of the nine goals she outlined: increasing support for alternative schools and community colleges.

"We have sent a message to our young people that if you don't go to college ... that you're thought less of in America. We have to stop this," she said. "Our country cannot run without the people who have the skills that are taught in this school."

Beyond education, Clinton said she would reduce special breaks for corporations, eliminate tax incentives for companies that ship jobs overseas and open up CEO pay to greater public scrutiny.

Clinton also said she would help people save more money by expanding and simplifying the earned income tax credit; create new jobs by pursuing energy independence; and ensure that every American has affordable health insurance.

Great.... another Royal. So why do women seem to pursue these socialist agendas? I thought women were strong willed and independant and didn't need help?

[Fe-Fi-Fo-Fum]

I don't know.  I don't trust her (or any politician really).  I am a Libertarian and am all for a fair, open society.  However I think this will just turn in to another way for the government to intrude even further in to your life.  Just to make sure things are 'fair' or perhaps 'fair enough' - depending upon your government status?  I certainly don't think that 'it takes a village' in Hillary Speak.  Every time I hear that phrase, I know someone want's what's in my wallet!


~Fe-Fi-Fo-Fum

[Mr. X]

It will NEVER be fair when the government tries to make things FAIR.

Check Chavez and his closing of the only opposing TV station in Venuzuella as an example of "fairness".

[Trueman]

[

"I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

Can you believe that came out of her mouth! What a hypocritical flaming fem-bot. No special privileges except if you are lacking a penis is what it should say.

[rantmeister]

"I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

Translation: "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans - except men. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for no one except women."


Hillary leaves no doubt she is a feminist:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/28/AR2007032801454.html

Clinton Receives Endorsement From NOW

By DEVLIN BARRETT
The Associated Press
Wednesday, March 28, 2007; 7:46 PM

WASHINGTON -- Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton declared Wednesday that if you look up the word "feminist" in a dictionary, you'll find her.

"If you look in the dictionary, the word feminist means someone who believes in equal rights for women in society, in the economy, the political process _ generally believes in the equality of women. And I certainly believe in the equality of women," she said.

Of course, she doesn't bother to clarify that. What might be the rights of men that need to be addressed? In her world, there are none.

What is her plan to correct the decline of male enrollment in US universities? Does she intend to make all young women register for the draft? What are her thoughts on enforcement of visitation rights? Hey, where'd she go??

[CaptDMO]

So..... Ms. Clinton has NOW on board.
I guess that means that the folks who hold a majority of  assets, despite claims of financial oppression as a minority demographic, are going to freely
support the folks that seek shelter under abutment girders.

[woof]

Presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton declared Wednesday that if you look up the word "feminist" in a dictionary, you'll find her.

Nuff said, I know the rest........woman are victims men are responsible, blah, blah, blah.

[gwallan]

Get fucked Hillary.
They're my toys earned with my own sweat and toil. Nobody else contributed one iota to it, least of all any woman. In fact a number of women have done their darndest to leech off it.

The gall of her. Feminists are the LAST people who are willing to share. As usual all take and no give.

Hillary if I had to share the same air as you I'd prefer oxygen deprivation.

[K9]

Sign on her podium: "Shared Prosperity". I'd like someone to ask her where she stands on Shared Responsibility. How about Shared Risk?
Are the people who benefit in her shared stolen money willing to suffer the same fate as those who actually risk everything? Can ya say communism?
Off topic of wealth, how about a presumption for Shared Parenting?

[TheManOnTheStreet]

Maybe she should show us all how it is done.  Take half of her and billy kneel and bob's riches and just give it to say.... Katrina "victims"? 

Uhuh... thought so.

TMOTS

[Mr. X]

Maybe she should show us all how it is done.  Take half of her and billy kneel and bob's riches and just give it to say.... Katrina "victims"? 

Uhuh... thought so.

TMOTS

Actually Bill Gates and Warren Buffet did just that putting together 60 billion and set up their own charity. Damn greedy capitalists. BTW notice they did NOT give that money to the fed to redistribute the wealth. Hmmm maybe two savy business men are smart enough to know their money would be wasted on the government welfare system.

In fact, why do 47 million people not have healthcare? Who is the IDIOT taxing minimum wage people instead of them putting the money into health insurance? I would think minimum wage earners would be the people YOU DO NOT TAX cause they are POOR! With a 3 trillion dollar declared debt and a 59 trillion dollar in the hole debt, I would think the biggest source of poverty is the federal government.

[gwallan]

In fact, why do 47 million people not have healthcare? Who is the IDIOT taxing minimum wage people instead of them putting the money into health insurance? I would think minimum wage earners would be the people YOU DO NOT TAX cause they are POOR! With a 3 trillion dollar declared debt and a 59 trillion dollar in the hole debt, I would think the biggest source of poverty is the federal government.

Well at least they're sharing the poverty.

[TheManOnTheStreet]

Maybe she should show us all how it is done.  Take half of her and billy kneel and bob's riches and just give it to say.... Katrina "victims"? 

Uhuh... thought so.

TMOTS

Actually Bill Gates and Warren Buffet did just that putting together 60 billion and set up their own charity. Damn greedy capitalists. BTW notice they did NOT give that money to the fed to redistribute the wealth. Hmmm maybe two savy business men are smart enough to know their money would be wasted on the government welfare system.

Exactly!  And virtually nothing is said in the media about it - no fanfair, nothing.... But oprah building a school in Africa is front page stuff....

TMOTS

[BRIAN]

It isn't just women or FEMS. This is pretty much the mantra of all neo-socialists. The Democrat Party of the United States has been been playing up the class envy "the rich get rich on the backs of the poor" strategy for the 60 years since FDR's "New Deal".