I would say the evil is a 50/50 split. Men are not inherrantly evil but then niether are women.
Here again, the use of the us and them mentality. First of all we are human.
The Duke case was pushed by a racial agenda first and foremost. I don't remember lots of women's groups (although I have to admit I don't keep up with them), but I do remember Jackson and Sharpton stirring the pot pretty good. The Duke case was a political tool used by a corrupt DA. Had the man not been running for office it would not have gone as far as it did.
Yates and Winkler I do not excuse or support so why keep bringing them up? If you want to match criminals we can do that.
Name a female criminal and I'll name a male. Is that the game you want to play?
It accomplishes nothing. But I guess if makes for fun wordplay.
But that is the point of this whole thread, to show that women commit evil at about the same rates as men, even more so given the fact that men usually have physical advantages in some ways. If men are say 1.5 times stronger than women on average then it would follow that men would commit 1.5 times more violence than women. But the stats show women are close to men in DV. That means womena re committing more DV than men given that men have a greater physical advantage.
You started arguing that it was MEN who commit the most amount of violent crimes way back on the second or third page. But clearly you accept that women commit violence as well as men and its not some 99 to 1 ratio. As you say, name a male criminal and I can name a female one. The point is I CAN DO THIS. That men are not the generic "bad guys" as you tried to state earlier when you brought up the stats about who commits the crimes.
We hear about those evil bad priests molesting boys and women's groups are all over the Catholic church tearing them apart even though it was shown the frequency of child molestation cases in the church were no more than the general public. Then BAM! all of a sudden the female teachers come out of the wood work. Again, for every male pedophile, I can now name a female one. I hardly think this is a new endemic situation and what's scary is, like the priest situation, tis been going on FOREVER. The only difference is society covered up the teacher cases because of the incorrect stereotype that women are angels and could never do such a thing.
As for Duke, there is plenty of news footage of women protesting the campus house demanding that a woman's word be believed. Also, have you ever watched Nancy Grace. There's a woman with a hard on for reasonable doubt ---- NOT.
What I am fighting is the stereotypes. The men-bad, women-good paradigm that is false. As you said, treat people as people. That means women lose all special priviledge. They are gray people like all the pother gray people shovelling coal like all the rest of us. If you do believe in "people are human" and "no teams" then all stereotypes and social rules like women never lie about rape have to be abolished.
Men only do worse than women cause they can physically. If women were bigger and stronger than men then we'd be the majority of abused people. Given the strong evidence of women performing over 60% of the child abuse in this country, its pretty evident that when women are bigger and stronger than a child they can abuse children.
The real issue is power, not gender. People with power can abuse people with less power and sex doesn't matter.
