So I wonder what would happen if all those bad men stopped building roads, bridges, buildings, technology.
I've noticed women flock to socialism like bees to honey. Also socialism seems to thrive in places where all the hard work of survival has already been eeked out by men. Sweden is an old world country. Its not like Japan where they keep making new sky scrapers every year. The buildings are already built. Roads are pretty much done. No places left to develop. Its a kind of resort community country. So yeahm if you don't have to build anything new and all life is about is collecting your looted government paycheck and drink coffee at the local coffee shop then go back to your one bedroom apartment and read a book then I guess you don't need individuality and property rights. Sweden also doesn't have to do jack for national defense. Its not strategic in anyway, hard to invade due to mountains and everyone knows the US, Germany, Britain etc covers their back.
Notice you don't see socialism in countries in Africa and, when it is there, those countries become toilets real quick. Look at Mexico and Venesualla. Striving people cannot afford socialism.
Sooner or later Sweden is going to bottom out like it did in the 90s. In the 90s it almost went bankrupt with a massive national debt, 65% tax rate on civilians and over 95% tax rate on corporations. Socialism is an unscroupulous scheme. Pay in X and get X time 100 or X times 1000 back. Its a way to force everyone else to pay your way, especially if you're a loser who can't make it on your own. Its approved looting. Talk to anyone who is for socialism and, if you dig deep enough you'll always find the same answer. They want to pay in X to get X times 1000 back and they want to be cared for.
But this leads back to women and socialism. Women have NOT gained independance. All they have done is taken the leash out of the hands of the traditional providers (men and husbands) and put that leash in the hands of the state. Now money is taken directly from men WITHOUT men having a say in any of it but the providing is still there. Women aren't independant. They aren't providing for themselves. Sure there are exceptions, the Suze Ormans, Oprahs etc who make a fortune because they are determined to be independant but they always have a dual saftey net. They always have marriage and now they have government to bail them out.
This myth that women are independant is a horrible and destructive force. Look at Hillary and Obama's wife wanting all these government programs to help women. Well who did that in the past? Husbands. But women threw men out claiming they were doing it for independance but they really didn't gain independance. All they really did was take away men's voice, put the government's gun to men's heads and just extorted the money outright in the form of taxes and redistribution of wealth for social programs.
Its a lie. A sham. A crime. Men need to call women on this AND do our utmost to pull that safety net away. If women want independance they can't then turn around and force men to pay their way through government strong arming men. Women who back socialism are just hypocrites wanting to be taken care of while denying men a voice.
I believe that's called slavery.
You ladies want socialism? You want the state to provide for you? Think Stalin. Hitler, Communist China. Bread lines. Gray uniforms. One size fits all policies and planning. No rights since they get in the way of the common good. You'll get your scoop of grool and your slice of stale bread. But as long as you can strut your shit, talk smack and brag about how you're so damned independant from men I guess its all worth it.
That would make a good cartoon. Show women standing in a never ending bread line all wearing the same gray outfits at the Women's Socialists Food Factory and one woman saying to the other "Isn't being independant from men grand! I love it!"