A Second Interview on the Michael Dresser Show

[Thomas]

For those who might be interested, I will be interviewed today, at 5 PM Eastern Daylight Time, on the Michael Dresser Show. We'll be discussing the worldwide collapse of fertility rates and the growing fiscal and cultural crises that are resulting. Of particular interest to those on this site -- we'll be discussing the contribution of the systematic breakdown of traditional male-female relationships.

The show can be heard live by going to Lifestyle Talk Radio and clicking on "Listen Live" under "On Air" in the upper left. Alternatively, the show can be heard live on any of the following stations.

WNEM 1250 AM   Saginaw-Bay
City-Midland, MI
KWOC  930 AM   Poplar Bluff, MO
KVBR 1340 AM   Brainerd, MN
KYLT 1340 AM   Missoula, MT
WGAI 560 AM    Elizabeth City, NC
WSMN 1590 AM   Manchester, NH
KNUU 970 AM   Las Vegas, NV
KELY 1230 AM  Las Vegas, NV
WBZB  98.5 FM  Nassau-Suffolk, NY
WVNJ 1160 AM   New York, NY
WHTH  790 AM   Columbus, OH
KGWA  960 AM   Enid, OK
KCUP 1230 AM   Toledo, OR
WPSE 1450 AM   Erie, PA
WLFP 1550 AM   Pittsburgh, PA
WRDD 1580 AM   Johnstown, PA
WISW 1320 AM   Columbia, SC
WDXI 1310 AM   Jackson, TN
KJDL 1420 AM   Lubbock ,TX
WHAN 1430 AM   Richmond, VA
KSBN 1230 AM   Spokane, WA
WBCF 1240 AM  Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL
KCEO 1000 AM   San Diego, CA
KHTY 970 AM   Bakersfield, CA
KNRY 1240 AM   Monterey-Salinas-Santa Cruz, CA
WGCH 1490 AM  Stamford-Norwalk, CT
WXCT 990 AM    Hartford-New Berlin-Middletown, CT
WJBW 1000 AM  West Palm Beach - Boca Raton , FL
WTMY 1280 AM   Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
WCFO 1160 AM   Atlanta, GA
WXBR 1460 AM   Boston, MA

Big R Radio Internet 0 Bothell, WA
Net Radio Partners  Internet Waynesboro,VA
World Internet Radio Network Internet 0 Cedar
Rapids, IA
IPR   Internet  Florida

International:
Clickonghana.com  Internet Brentford, England
Middlesex

[Thomas]

The interview went well, and we were able to discuss some of the negative impacts that feminism is having on society. The show can be heard here.

[Garak]

The interview went well, and we were able to discuss some of the negative impacts that feminism is having on society. The show can be heard here.

I just listened to the show. The only thing I have to disagree with is gay marriage.

Gay marriage has a huge impact on heterosexual families and it is the reason feminists support it.

Children need a father and a mother to be balanced adults, not a single mother, not 2 fathers and not 2 mothers.

We are looking at redefining the traditional family in 3 ways:

1) Mother and Children
2) 2 Mothers and children
3) 2 Fathers and children (not likely given our court systems)

What's missing? Heterosexual males...no wonder the feminists support the gay marriage movement. Without heterosexual males, the birthrate will not improve.

[Suckerfish]

Have studies been done regarding how kids grow up in mother/mother or father/father households compared to children who grow up in mother/father households?

[Garak]

Have studies been done regarding how kids grow up in mother/mother or father/father households compared to children who grow up in mother/father households?

I doubt it but is it really necessary? The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family and since it will....you can bet it has public support.

What we don't want is to divert the focus to children cause we all know who wins when that happens. Children are used for feminist agendas all the time and once the children are mentioned...nothing else matters.

Men will continue to lose rights and the traditional family will continue to erode if we continue to let them dominate us by using the children.

[Thomas]

The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family

I have never met a heterosexual couple that decided not to get married or not to have children, because homosexuals would like to be able to marry.

[TheManOnTheStreet]

The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family

I have never met a heterosexual couple that decided not to get married or not to have children, because homosexuals would like to be able to marry.

Bit of a streach there Thomas... That is not what he was saying at all.

TMOTS

[Cordell Walker]

The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family

I have never met a heterosexual couple that decided not to get married or not to have children, because homosexuals would like to be able to marry.

Bit of a streach there Thomas... That is not what he was saying at all.

TMOTS

lets face it though, why in the hell not let  gays get married......the "institution of  marriage" is a joke anymore anyway........you got reality shows "who wants to marry............"; I mean IMO their are bigger fish to fry

[CaptDMO]

lets face it though, why in the hell not let  gays get married......the "institution of  marriage" is a joke anymore anyway........you got reality shows "who wants to marry............"; I mean IMO their are bigger fish to fry

Hmmm.... Ever explored "The broken window" aspect of sociology?
GEE, how's about we just eliminate the concept marriage altogether?
The "institution of  marriage" is a joke (in the eyes of the law) anymore anyway..!
Just think of all those pesky domestic violence laws that could be eliminated!
Think of all those "equality" arguments, cited by "advocates" for dissatisfied married women, homosexual folk, and for the children theorists, that could just be eliminated.

Law practitioners and ancillary "paras" could pursue less lucrative, yet more productive, interests. Half the workload, and half the red herrings, would be relieved from professional political  consideration

That would be fair, productive, and EVERYBODY would be better off, right?
Well then, we've ALL decided, so let's make it so!
And let's not hear any more "Well what about.....?" arguments.


 

[Cordell Walker]

The broken window theory is  kind of what guliani put in place in new york to stop crime right??
and  I would rather see marriage restored  than abolished but IMO it cant be saved

[Thomas]

Bit of a streach there Thomas... That is not what he was saying at all.

He stated:

Gay marriage has a huge impact on heterosexual families

and

The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family and since it will...

I have yet to come across a shred of evidence, as opposed to declarations, that gay relationships of any sort are eroding the traditional family. In fact, to repeat what I wrote, "I have never met a heterosexual couple that decided not to get married or not to have children, because homosexuals would like to be able to marry."

Here's an article about the collapse of marriage in Colorado and the US as a whole. Not one of the people interviewed mentions anything about homosexuality as a reason for them not getting married.

The collapse of traditional male-female relationships is having a devastating impact on societies around the world. We're not going to solve the problem by blaming people who are not causing the crisis.

[Garak]

Let me put in the simplest terms I can everyone.

The traditional family is threatened by ANY re-defiinition of family.

Since we know that heterosexual men will not be considered a part of any of these new definitions...tell me how it does not hurt the traditional family?

Dr. Thomas, redefining the family to mother and children has caused tremendous damage to marriage and the birth rate. Adding more unnatural definitions will logically cause more damage since gay and lesbian couples cannot procreate (which affects the birth rate) and re-enforces the idea that marriage is no longer meant for heterosexual men.

[Garak]

The only thing that matter is if it would help to erode the traditional family

I have never met a heterosexual couple that decided not to get married or not to have children, because homosexuals would like to be able to marry.

Bit of a streach there Thomas... That is not what he was saying at all.

TMOTS

lets face it though, why in the hell not let  gays get married......the "institution of  marriage" is a joke anymore anyway........you got reality shows "who wants to marry............"; I mean IMO their are bigger fish to fry

In other words, since marriage has been abused it is ok to abuse it more?

Why don't we just say the same for heterosexual men? Since heterosexual men have been abused...why the hell not abuse them/us some more?

[Lazurite]

Let me put in the simplest terms I can everyone.

The traditional family is threatened by ANY re-defiinition of family.

Since we know that heterosexual men will not be considered a part of any of these new definitions...tell me how it does not hurt the traditional family?

How, exactly?  If marriage is opened to gays, straight people will continue to form marriages with one man and one woman, the same as now.  Opening marriage to gays and lesbians won't change that, it just means that gay and lesbian couples will legally be married instead of single.  They weren't getting married anyway.  The only difference it might make at all to traditional marriage is the small number of bisexuals who might choose a partner of their own sex over one of the opposite sex since lack of marriage benefits would no longer be an issue.

[Thomas]

Pentium4 wrote:

Let me put in the simplest terms I can everyone.

The traditional family is threatened by ANY re-defiinition of family.

Since we know that heterosexual men will not be considered a part of any of these new definitions...tell me how it does not hurt the traditional family?

You declare that gay relationships harm the traditional family. Justify the claim. What evidence (not declarations, evidence) do you have that gay relationships of any sort harm the system of a man, woman, and children in a legally and/or religiously committed relationship.