Whether or not it's actually called marriage isn't important from a utilitarian perspective.
Gee, we've been through this
From a utilitarian prospective "Rape" implies what?
From a utilitarian prospective "Domestic violence" implies what?
From a utilitarian prospective "user fee, regulatory assessment, surcharge, etc., etc," imply what?
From a utilitarian prospective "child abuse" implies what?
From a utilitarian prospective "child suppport" implies what?
From a utilitarian prospective "education" implies what?
From a utilitarian prospective "head of household" implies what?
But if you insist-
when I say "gay" I refer to happy-
apparently an inappropriate word for many un-wed, un-adored, un-
specially entitled, radical practitioners of homosexuality.
when I say "lesbian", I'm referring to the female subset of homosexual practitioners.
when I say "dyke", I refer to only to water management.
when I say "diesel dyke", I refer only to petroleum spill containment.
when I say "faggot" I refer only to that worth the same as bundles of sticks.
when I say "retard", I refer only to deceleration.
when I say "Liars" I refer to ALL groups that have repeatedly, and traditionally,
utilized disingenuous assumptions of ironicly co-opted language, strictly for the
strategy of assimilation of established truisms where the heavy lifting has already been
done by others .
Glad you could help to clear up.
Erin Pizzy would approve.
