To clarify, I mean using somewhat abrasive and in your face tactics to get the mra message across. Everything from flyering college campuses with inflammatory one-sheets to disrupting speeches by the opposition. Getting the message across any way, any how seems attractive to me sometimes, I must admit.
I personally am on the fence as to whether this is good for the cause or not. I could see how some of the powers that be on this board might see guerrilla activism as polarizing and therefore not good for the cause. In many ways I would agree, except that polarizing inflammatory activists DO serve one purpose, which is to redefine the middle. I've been thinking about this for a while and i would appreciate some honest input.