A very good point. You've made other points to me that have had good results. I wonder, first, if you're referring to the bar associations...I consider them just as bad as administrative parts of the government. When you say 'Law Society,' what do you mean? From what I see, the most opposition power comes from feminist lobbyists, and not just the traditional type. One tactic I've seen a great deal of lately is judicial lobbying...feminist groups - almost always funded by taxpayers - either provide to or send to judges these things called 'bench books.' Usually used by judges as a reference to current relevant law of all kinds in their jurisdiction, they are normally darned expensive. These recent feminist-funded things being given out are used for gifts to new judges, excuses for judges who want one, and more often - and more importantly - to provide judicial 'education' that meets the standards of VAWA so as to ensure funding. They are filled with vile rhetoric, and lies - ya know, the sort of thing we're used to seeing around here.
One of the parts of this plan I've been developing is to force judicial education programs to become available to the public for review, and to prevent *anyone* from sending these sort of gifts to judges. Is this the sort of thing you meant by 'Law Society?' If it is, I've got more for you...please let me know.
