feminist public school system is a toxic environment

Started by outdoors, Mar 06, 2008, 03:22 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

outdoors

http://www.henrymakow.com/

By Brian Simpson (pseudonym)

I've been a supply teacher for 20 years in every subject area, K-12  in over 200 schools and in over 1000 classrooms in a large Canadian city.  I can report that the education system has been taken over by feminists and lesbians who preach a daily diet of hate, violence and discrimination against males despite pretenses of "tolerance" "non violence" and "inclusiveness."

It's moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing.  Slogans on T-Shirts include: "Stupid Factory:Where Boys are Made;" "BOYS ARE STUPID, THROW ROCKS AT THEM!" and (prefixed by the profile view of a handgun)  "He had it comin'"

Others include  "WHO NEEDS BOYS WHEN YOU HAVE CREDIT CARDS?" and "I LIKE BOYS WHO ARE SENSITIVE AND CRY, WHEN i HIT THEM;"  and "MENtal Anxiety MENtal Breakdown MENstrual Cramps MENopause  Did you ever notice how all our problems begin with MEN."

Can you imagine if these comments were addressed at girls?

I've been in staff rooms where I have read pamphlets issued by the Canadian Federation of Teachers about Afghanistan.  Exclusive concern was shown for women, girls and female babies and none for males despite the fact that boys had the double-whammy-plus of being forced to carry a gun, kill and be killed, traumatize and be traumatized, starting as early as eight-years-of-age.  They had been denied schooling and been traumatized for life.  The girls only had been denied schooling.

I've been in classrooms where videos were shown blaming all date violence on males.  No sexual violence female-to-male was mentioned and women were referred to as "men's property."  Once the video had been shown, the girls overflowed with anti-male hate statements and the boys were afraid to speak on any matter.  I told students that the video's depiction was false but they insisted that the video depiction was the absolute truth.  Such indoctrination is the norm in schools.

In the context of the omni-present, "Women's History Month" posters in the school, I have been in homerooms in which the boys are so abused by their feminist teachers that they cannot even whimper, even after serial attempts to get them to say anything at all.  In one classroom in which Grade-12 students were nearing their graduation, I had a boy cry  about the climate of ever-climaxing anti-male hate.


EMPLOYMENT

As a male, I am routinely discriminated against for employment with no recourse to authorities.

In supply teaching, patterns emerge such as gender-cleansing in the early years (Men need not apply.)  The substitute clerks want women, and when they can't get them (a rarity), a man can get called at the last minute (late calls generally translate as, "I-couldn't-get-a-woman call"). 

In my experience, all substitute clerks are women.  In the last two decades, phone/computer machines have been put into place in various districts.  As a result, when IT phones instead of SHE, the early years open up to men, initially.  The resultant realization that the conventional gender-cleansing is not in place results in male supply teachers being "greeted" by school secretaries (always women) who ask the man reporting to the office in the morning, "What are YOU doing here?"  "I'm here for____(a woman teacher)."

In response to that, the secretary reports the man to the principal who tries to gender-cleanse by saying to the male supply teacher, "I can give you Grade 5."  "No, thanks, I'll take the Kindergartens."  I've even had to discuss such matters for two minutes with some principals. 

In the hundreds and hundreds of applications I have put into for teaching jobs, I have never had a response to any application for Grade 2, Grade 1 nor Kindergarten; and I've only had one interview for a position in Grade 3--which was assigned to a woman.

FACULTY OF EDUCATION

Here are some of my experiences as an Education student. 

First of all, to be in teaching is to be immersed in femininity.  Wall-to-wall women, everywhere; the students, the teaching staff, the curriculum, the posters on walls, the celebrations, the laments, the teacher unions, the student unions, the union unions.  In perfect lock-step, all are one, and half of humanity counts for nothing, except to be harmed, of course. 

In one class, the professor had issued a 4-page photocopy to all students (26 women and 3 men in the room).  The article was composed entirely of assertions.  There was a perfect void of evidence.  The essence of the article was that men, most especially white men were all advantaged and that women were all disadvantaged.

The monomania was so advanced that one black woman complained that whereas there was affirmative action for women, including black women, it was mostly Caribbean black women who got the jobs and not the African black women.  The women in the room gushed with sympathy that such a situation could persist in Canada.  Various women-as-victim and men-as-victimizer as the universally advantaged had serialized.  I waited for an almost void in the lament and had declared various facts. 

I pointed out that in Canada's armed services, over 116 000 men and boys and only 30 women and no girls had been killed in service and that the response of governments in Canada and elsewhere the world over had been one of, "Advance women." 

I pointed out that in the civilian work world, up to 2005, just over 96% of job-caused deaths were male and that as of 2006, with the boom in the economy, for the first time, just over 1000 men and only approximately 20 women were killed.   

The women who spoke (about 12 of them), utterly whaled against me in seething frenzied hate.  It was like being in a Nazi Party meeting.   I was shouted-down.  In fact, the women who insisted that the proper world order was save-the-women/kill-the-men, complained vociferously to the knights in shining armor (the few men who were allowed into the teaching faculty.)

These professor men called me at home on a Sunday to set up a meeting to censor me for raising gender issues!.  They didn't complain about what the women were doing. 

The one male professor encouraged me to get out of teaching by way of using the university employment service (a feminist organization.)

I told them that in every case, I was responding to the women who had raised the issues in the first place and that they had to back off.  The head professor said he would speak with the professors.  But, following that meeting, my classroom curricula had included one article about suicide which mentioned that female depression was 50% higher than male depression, but did not mention that male suicide was 400% higher than female suicide.

Another professor issued learning-outcome statements to the class which counselled us to include examples of women (and not examples of men).


OTHER HARASSMENT


Previous to that event, we teacher-students were shown a video of two teachers in team teaching.  The woman teacher in the video had the line assigned to her, "I hope I'm treated as an equal (by the man teacher)" and the man teacher was assigned the line, "I'll have to guard against my male ego." 

The same female professor who had presented that video had chosen a text book which included curricular topics for lesson plans.  The topics included, "Violence against Women" (and, of course, no concern for "Violence against Men"). 

During one presentation, a mother of a disabled daughter told how some, "ardent Feminist" women had taken her daughter to a male strip joint.  Such was described by the mother as, "wonderful."  Following that, the same "ardent Feminist" woman had taken her daughter to the USA to attend a Feminist, "woman's music camp" and we were shown a slide of those women, many of whom were topless. Evidently lesbianism is encouraged.

"So, why didn't you complain to officials of the university or elsewhere?"  My answer is as follows:  The student union had a handbook which blamed all date violence on men and its front office window had three prominently displayed posters about date violence which blamed into all on men.  Also, annually, the union had taken part in the Marc Lepine remembrance day ceremonies at the university...which blamed everything on men.  As for the university, it had Women's Studies and no Men's Studies, and a , "Womyn's Center" and no Men's Center.  The, poster, "greeting" men to the Womyn's Centre" reads: 

MEN: 


Welcome to the Womyn's Centre

This is a SAFE PLACE for Womyn

and Womyn identified people only.

MEN are asked to KNOCK before entering and to use the space briefly

Only to access the resources such as:  pamphlets, free stuff and books in the Library.



Thank you for your respect and understanding.



To the above, I can only say, "No thanks for the disrespect and hate."

Cordell Walker

digusting
"how can you kill women and children?"---private joker
"Easy, ya just dont lead em as much" ---Animal Mother

MAUS

http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/309495


HATE LAWS
TheStar.com | GTA | Protection for females demanded

Protection for females demanded

Mar 05, 2008 04:30 AM
Kristin Rushowy
Education Reporter

A coalition of students, academics and educators is appealing to federal politicians to change the Criminal Code so females are protected under hate laws.

In an open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper and opposition party leaders Stéphane Dion, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe released yesterday, the Violence in the Media Coalition urges them to "address a vital public safety issue affecting half of the population of Canada that can no longer be ignored."

Currently, the hate law covers individuals by colour, race, religion, ethnicity and sexual orientation.

"Omitting girls and women from the list compromises their safety," the letter says. "There is no justification for it. It is a stark piece of `unfinished business' and one has to seriously wonder why it is taking so long to deal with it."

Peter Jaffe, of the University of Western Ontario and the group's spokesperson, said the coalition has been trying, unsuccessfully, to get politicians' attention.

"We wrote the open letter to the federal leaders hoping that they'd work together on this."

Jaffe said two recent reports on the sexual harassment and assaults that young females encounter in Ontario's high schools is a sign of the negative impact hateful images can have in the media.

"Whether you are looking at video games or music videos or if you look at pornography ... there are more violent images" and you begin to think these are acceptable ways to treat women, he said.

In 2007, the coalition - which includes the province's elementary and secondary teacher unions, both public and Catholic, student trustees, school boards and the Canadian Centre for Abuse Awareness - held a news conference to say children are being exposed to too much violence and to ask for limits on violent programming on television after 9 p.m., among other things.

The group says current federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, as Ontario's attorney general, supported adding women to the Public Incitement of Hatred provisions.

Ontario Education Minister Kathleen Wynne has asked a group of experts to study ways to prevent sexual harassment, gender-based violence and homophobia in schools. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health reports one-third of female high school students it polled were victims of unwanted sexual touching at school.

Saturday is International Women's Day.



Outdoors, This is all the work of that .... :rolle:......mutual admiration society....we talked about before with the YOUTUBE campaign to get WHYmen's studies introduced into the high schools.

Send copies of your post to all of the people who are mentioned in the above article. Let them know that their are people in Ontario who know better and who will say so. Anytime I send anything to the Ontario Government I get the you-are-not-a-resident kiss off...the fact that my grandchildren attend school there notwithstanding.

ClarkCable

If you're a male teacher and you get out without being falsely accused of molestation then consider yourself lucky.

gwallan

Quote
"Omitting girls and women from the list compromises their safety," the letter says. "There is no justification for it. It is a stark piece of `unfinished business' and one has to seriously wonder why it is taking so long to deal with it."


I have grave concerns with any human rights or "hate" related laws that specify ANY particular groups. By default it means that some groups will be left unprotected. Anyone who thinks that those unprotected will not be violated legally at some point is living in cloud cuckoo land.

When you leave any group unprotected they become the only legitimate target for violation.
In 95% of things 100% of people are alike. It's the other 5%, the bits that are different, that make us interesting. It's also the key to our existence, and future, as a species.

Mr. X


Quote
"Omitting girls and women from the list compromises their safety," the letter says. "There is no justification for it. It is a stark piece of `unfinished business' and one has to seriously wonder why it is taking so long to deal with it."


I have grave concerns with any human rights or "hate" related laws that specify ANY particular groups. By default it means that some groups will be left unprotected. Anyone who thinks that those unprotected will not be violated legally at some point is living in cloud cuckoo land.

When you leave any group unprotected they become the only legitimate target for violation.

Doesn't that then make the law moot. If everyone is included then the law is simply the laws that are on the books which is you can't hurt other people. But hate crime laws are worse since they serve to control speech. I don't think any hate crime laws should exist. They are not about justice they are about pedistalizing certain groups and always keeping these groups as victims.
Feminists - "Verbally beating men like dumb animals or ignoring them is all we know and its not working."

foldedintobeauty

i stopped reading after the author said "lesbians."
when would jesus floss?

gwallan



Quote
"Omitting girls and women from the list compromises their safety," the letter says. "There is no justification for it. It is a stark piece of `unfinished business' and one has to seriously wonder why it is taking so long to deal with it."


I have grave concerns with any human rights or "hate" related laws that specify ANY particular groups. By default it means that some groups will be left unprotected. Anyone who thinks that those unprotected will not be violated legally at some point is living in cloud cuckoo land.

When you leave any group unprotected they become the only legitimate target for violation.

Doesn't that then make the law moot. If everyone is included then the law is simply the laws that are on the books which is you can't hurt other people. But hate crime laws are worse since they serve to control speech. I don't think any hate crime laws should exist. They are not about justice they are about pedistalizing certain groups and always keeping these groups as victims.


It possibly makes these sorts of laws redundant. We do have them however and the general trend is to be specific about the "groups" being protected. This ultimately will make those laws usable only to those "groups" and leaves other groups liable to, and unprotected from, violation.

In 95% of things 100% of people are alike. It's the other 5%, the bits that are different, that make us interesting. It's also the key to our existence, and future, as a species.

typhonblue

#8
Mar 09, 2008, 12:00 AM Last Edit: Mar 09, 2008, 12:17 AM by typhonblue
To be fair there is a vocal community of lesbian seperatists who are quite proud of the fact that they have a profound antipathy towards men.

MAUS


i stopped reading after the author said "lesbians."


Sexual orientation is about which gender you like...not which gender you hate and want to get lawyers to screw.

Go Up