Islam is Evil

Started by Amber, Nov 19, 2003, 10:21 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

Amber

"Islam is currently holding back people all over the world from achieving freedom, prosperity -- even a life in which they can be guaranteed they won't be plucked off tomorrow by mullahs and killed.  It is the fundamental oppressor of people around the world.  Yet leftists are so insistent on apologizing for it.  The best they can do is say "but Christianity is bad too!"  Ya ... NOT an excuse.  Especially considering Christianity is NOT currently serving as the oppressor of people around the world.  Digging up what happened hundreds of years ago is the best leftists can do.

Can't you see how brainwashed you are???????  There are various leaders who WANT you to apologize for Islam because there are various leaders who WANT the world to be oppressed.  

If you favored human rights - if you favored the liberation of people around the world - if you favored allowing these people, MANY of whom are people of enlightenment and reason, particulary in Iran, to go friggin' to a mall just to shop, or to not have to fear their life every day, or to be able to just go outside in shorts and a shirt as women to enjoy the sunshine - you will be opposed to Islam.  

*Comparing it to the evils of Christianity is NOT an excuse
*Comparing it to what Christians did 100 years ago is NOT an excuse
*Saying it is only people who have a bad interpretation of the Koran is NOT an excuse

Get off your duff.  Wake up.  This religion is evil.  It is responsible for oppression, murder, tyranny.  Develop a goddam moral backbone.  Stand up to this evil, which you - for whatever mind-numbing reason - feel the need to defend.  "
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Amber

Quote from: "weekendwarrior77"
it is not the fault of the religion itself that it is taken so out of context and used for evil purposes




IT IS NOT BEING TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT.

These are people who take Islam word for word.  It is the logical conclusion of the Koran being applied to human life.
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Amber

Quote from: "weekendwarrior77"
yes and word for word according to the bible i can take someone who owes me a little bit of money into slavery for the next 6 years



Why do you keep trying to apologize for Islam by saying other religions are corrupt too?

This is the most cowardly, morally bankrupt tactic ever.

You're the type of person who, when gets called on a bad behavior, doesn't own up to it, but instead shouts, "but look - he's bad too!!"  Therefore, somehow, your behavior is excused.

IT'S NOT!!!!

Let's say Jane murders Steve and someone calls her on it.  Instead of owning up to it, Jane says, "But look, Betty killed Todd!!"

What do you think of the moral character of Jane?

That's exactly who you are.
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Amber

I think it's relatively obvious that what is needed to topple Islam is a secular philosophy which favors human rights, freedom, and prosperity.

The problem with people on the right is that people on the left, who apologize for Islam, will come at religious conservatives with "But you don't take Christianity word for word do you ????  How can you possibly critique Islam when YOUR religion has so many holes??"

So what happens is people on the right just topple over.  They 1)  Don't want to have to defend the word for word statements of their religion and 2)  Like Bush and many other conservatives, don't want to acknowledge the notion that a secular government, what people the world over want, is a good thing.

But when an atheist comes along and calls leftists on their bullshit - namely, that all religions based on mysticism, with violent, terroristic passages, is wrong - they don't know what to do.  All of a suddent they can't use the cowardly "but Christianity has holes too!" to defend their argument.

Leftists are so full of crap.  Liberalism (not leftism) at one time stood for reason, enlightenment, freedom and was opposed to religion.  Now they apologize for the worst of religions.  What the hell happened???

It is a clear cut case why someone like Bush is not the guy to be dealing with Islamic terrorists.
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Nichov

Quote:
"Especially considering Christianity is NOT currently serving as the oppressor of people around the world. Digging up what happened hundreds of years ago is the best leftists can do. "

How did pro-Islam become a leftist issue?  Politically speaking, religion usually falls on the right doesn't it?  And Christian societies ARE the major oppressors around the world as I see it, namely in the form of American Imperialsism. Not that it's all America mind you.

Quote:
"If you favored human rights - if you favored the liberation of people around the world - if you favored allowing these people, MANY of whom are people of enlightenment and reason, particulary in Iran, to go friggin' to a mall just to shop, or to not have to fear their life every day, or to be able to just go outside in shorts and a shirt as women to enjoy the sunshine - you will be opposed to Islam. "

I don't know if that's fair, there's plenty of Muslims around the world who walk around in shorts and a shirt.  Ohh, and Iran has malls, and people goto them often, even the women.

Quote:
"IT IS NOT BEING TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT.

These are people who take Islam word for word. It is the logical conclusion of the Koran being applied to human life."

Then how do you account for moderate Muslims?  There are Muslims in the US, do you see them carrying AK's and throwing stones?  It's not the religion it's the government.  In my opinion.

Quote:
"weekendwarrior77 wrote:
yes and word for word according to the bible i can take someone who owes me a little bit of money into slavery for the next 6 years

Why do you keep trying to apologize for Islam by saying other religions are corrupt too?

This is the most cowardly, morally bankrupt tactic ever. "

Actually, I think what weekendwarrior is getting at is not that Islam can save grace by pointing out flaws in Christianity, but that the flaws in Islam you are pointing out are a result of a poor interpretation of the Qu'aran, or even perhaps an exploitive one used to bring religious supporters to war efforts.  (what Christian leaders do that? <coughbushcough>)

He points out that if Christianity had a different interpretation of the bible (and in some places it does, and in some points in history it did, and it got pretty ugly <coughspanishinquisitioncough>) Christianity might not be seen as such a pretty religion.

But to you, what I just said probably sounds exactly like what weekendwarrior said, so I guess we're just gonna have to let you get away with a bigoted view on this one.

Quote:
"Like Bush and many other conservatives, don't want to acknowledge the notion that a secular government, what people the world over want, is a good thing. "

As long as there are people in the world and in the government who have faith in a God or a doctrine of ideology, a secular government cannot truly exist.  How can you ask a Christian to make decisions on morality without taking into account the very basis for their understanding of morality, namely their faith?  (answer that one please)


Quote:
"Leftists are so full of crap. Liberalism (not leftism) at one time stood for reason, enlightenment, freedom and was opposed to religion. Now they apologize for the worst of religions. What the hell happened??? "

Not true.  Liberals were for seperation of church and state, not against religion.  In fact, they were for religion, and the freedom to practice any religion or faith that people wished.  There is a fine line between Congress passing a law (as the amendment goes) "respecting an establishment of religion" and the individuals within Congress drawing upon their faith-based morality to make decisions for the country.

Quote:
"It is a clear cut case why someone like Bush is not the guy to be dealing with Islamic terrorists."

I agree with you that Bush shouldn't be dealing with Islamic Extreemists, just for different reasons.

Ohh, and by the way, since you bring up terrorism, let me get my two cents in there too.  Terrorism.  Isn't that just murder?  Ohh, but if you murder someone while Muslim now it is a terrorist act, with higher punishments.  Should there be such a thing?  Do we want murderers to be punished more or less based upon the supposed reason for that murder?  We already do this with so-called 'hate-crimes' which basically means if a white guy kills a white guy it's murder, but if a white guy kills a black guy it's a hate crime, and comes with a stiffer penalty.

Now we can arrest people and hold them without lawyers indefinately, and some have been held for over 2 years already, without telling them why they are being held.  That's under the Partiot Act, which means anyone the police or any other government agency labels a terrorist, for whatever reason, may be searched and seized without due process.

The Patriot Act is of course unconstitutional, and would probably be done away with if it weren't for the fact that Bush got to appoint a bunch of Supreme Court Justices during his term.

Course for the Supreme Court to do anything, a person has to have a legal trial, and that is not necessarily the case with criminals labeled 'terrorists' because often those cases goto military courts, and as I said, people have been detained for over 2 years now, with no official charges filed.  I thought America didn't take political prisoners!
Society does not have the right to discriminate against victims of domestic violence because of their gender."  - www.amen.ie

Amber

I'm having fun with this over at www.protestwarrior.com

Quote
The thing is that Christians slagging Islam for producing violence is roughly as hypocritical as Stalin calling Hitler a murderer.



See what I mean?? SEE WHAT I MEAN???  Instead of debating the point about Islam, they totally divert: "Christians are bad too!!"

You know what.  Think about this:  whatever Christian ideology was responsible for IS LONG AGO IN THE PAST AND CANNOT BE FIXED.  What Islam ideology is reponsible for IS ALIVE AND WELL RIGHT NOW AND CAN BE FIXED.

Get it?????
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Amber

Quote
Then how do you account for moderate Muslims? There are Muslims in the US, do you see them carrying AK's and throwing stones? It's not the religion it's the government. In my opinion.



Ya, that's because they live in the United States.  These Muslims are tamed by our secular nation and objective law.  Go somewhere where the Muslim religion isn't muzzled by our secular, rational laws, and see how Islam pans out.
he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

devia

Like Turkey?

Nichov

Quote:
"Ya, that's because they live in the United States. These Muslims are tamed by our secular nation and objective law. Go somewhere where the Muslim religion isn't muzzled by our secular, rational laws, and see how Islam pans out."

Then you must say that it is the government that is to blame, and not the Qu'aran itself.

it's like there's variable A (the government), B (The Qu'aran), and C (the result of moderatism or extreemism.)  You change variable A and variable C also changes, but then you are still saying that variable B is the problem.  

Comparing it to christianity, not to beat a dead horse, and you can easily see that before the seperation of church and state in christian nations, extreemist christians went on a rampage entirely comparable to what we see in extreemist islam today.

But you dare to say "The religion is evil."

The religion is evil
The religion is evil
The religion is evil

The more I hear it, the more false it sounds.

The religion is evil

Nope, still can't seem to convince myself.
Society does not have the right to discriminate against victims of domestic violence because of their gender."  - www.amen.ie

The Gonzman

Hey, Komrade - EVER READ  THE FRIGGIN KORAN?  Or Qu'ran, as they call it?

Wanna discuss it with me?  I have a few degrees in history, and comparative religions?  I have five translations right here, three within arm's reach.  I'll quote ya verse for verse.

:twisted:

I've always considered it to be fundamentally illogical that the biggest criticism of Christianity as a religion is because of the hypocrisy, when, (ahem) the definition of a hypocrite is someone who preaches something he doesn't even believe in, let alone practice - thus the problem with christianity isn't the Christians, but the yahoos claiming to be Christian who AREN'T.  Much like the leftist who belongs to the "progressive" church but disagrees with what mainstream religion defines as the tenets of faith and values.

Well, okay, yeah.  That is the problem.  Pity there's not a lot more excommunication going on to get the asswipes who want to parade, say, their Catholocism (Kennedy?  Dukkakis?) around, but not put any of it meaningfully into their lives.


Now - let's take a look at some of these "peaceful and tolerant" laws of the "Benevolent Muslims."

For several centuries following the codification of the Quran, the religion of Islam spread through warfare. Conquered peoples were generally forced to convert to Islam or be put to death; the only exceptions were Jews and Christians, who were given the choice to become a dhimmi. If a Jew or Christian did so, they became a protected citizen under Islamic law, and they would be allowed not only to live, but also to freely practice their religion. If they chose not to become dhimmi, they died.

Dhimmis were legally exempt from performing otherwise mandatory Islamic duties, such as paying the zakah (alms for the poor), but must instead pay a special tax called jizyah ("skull tax"). While Dhimmis were exempt from the military draft, they could not serve in the army even if they wished to.

Later legislation in the Sharia (Muslim Religious/Secular Law) codified the rule that Jews and Christians were forbidden to blaspheme the Quran, the religion of Islam, or their prophet Muhammad. Jews and Christians were also forbidden to ask Muslims to join their faith, but Muslims were allowed to ask Jews and Christians to convert to Islam (see proselytization). Violation of these rules could invoke the death sentence.

Dhimmis were subject to many further restrictions. There were various things forbidden to dhimmis at various times:

    Holding public office
    Bearing weapons
    Riding camels or horses
    Building houses of worship higher than mosques
    Mourning loudly
    Offering evidence in court against a Muslim
    Offering an oath in a Muslim court of law
    Dressing in the same way that Arabs dressed
    Also, dhimmis were sometimes forced to wear distinct clothing, such as forcing all Jews to wear a yellow badge.  (A yellow Star of David.  Hmmm.  That sounds so ...so ...familiar?  Oh yeah, Germany, in the 1930's.)



Under Sharia (Muslim Religious Law), if a Jew or Christian is convicted of killing a Muslim, the sentence is death. If a Muslim is convicted of killing a Jew or Christian, there is no death sentence.

Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 9.50; Narrated by Abu Juhaifa, states:

I asked 'Ali "Do you have anything Divine literature besides what is in the Qur'an?" Or, as Uyaina once said, "Apart from what the people have?" 'Ali said, "By Him Who made the grain split (germinate) and created the soul, we have nothing except what is in the Qur'an and the ability (gift) of understanding Allah's Book which He may endow a man with, and what is written in this sheet of paper." I asked, "What is on this paper?" He replied, "The legal regulations of Diya (Blood-money) and the (ransom for) releasing of the captives, and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever)."

Sunan of Abu-Dawood Hadith 2745; Narrated by Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-'As, states:

The Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) said: ... A believer shall not be killed for an unbeliever, nor a confederate within the term of confederation with him.

Islamic law holds that if a Christian rapes a Muslim, the Christian must immediately be killed by any Muslim. If a Muslim man rapes a dhimmi, there is no death penalty. 7520, AL-RISALA (Maliki Manual); 37.27 A CHRISTIAN RAPIST, states:

If a Christian rapes a Muslim woman he is to be killed immediately by any Muslim. But a Muslim cannot be executed on account of a non-believer.

Islamic law prohibits Muslims stealing from dhimmis, and dhimmis stealing from Muslims. There is one exception: According to some opinions, Muslims are allowed to steal religious objects from Christian or pagan houses of worship, because such objects considered idolatrous and prohibited.  3915, AL-HEDAYA Vol. II (Hanafi Manual):

Amputation is not incurred by stealing a crucifix, although is be of gold, - nor by stealing a chess-board or chess pieces of gold, as it is in the thief's power to excuse himself, by saying "I took them with a view to break and destroy them, as things prohibited." It is otherwise with respect to coin bearing the impression of an idol, by the theft of which amputation is incurred; because the money is not the object of worship, so as to allow of it destruction, and thus leave it in the thief's power to excuse himself. It is recorded, as an opinion of Abu Yusuf, that if a crucifix be stolen out of a Christian place of worship, amputation is not incurred; but if it be taken from a house, the hand of the thief is to be struck off, for in such a situation it is lawful property, and the object of custody.

Trust me, this only scratches the surface of this utterly degenerate and morally bankrupt, miserable, excuse for a religion.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the Shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for I am the MEANEST son-of-a-bitch in the valley.

Nichov

Well, yeah, you see, the hypocrisy comes in when people see a God talk about not killing and then they see the same God ravage the earth with a flood and kill everyone but Noah and his wife...

I'm not one of these.

Quote:
"Now - let's take a look at some of these "peaceful and tolerant" laws of the "Benevolent Muslims." "

How can we, when you haven't quoted a single verse from the Qu'aran? (as I call it, though I'm a Christian, or to put it in your terms, one of 'us')

The laws you are talking about are from the governments... we already discussed the implications of the lack of a seperation of church and state in the Muslim world on this thread... so my views on it have already been explored.

Do you prejudge me because my name is Russian?  You seem to think I am a communist or a socialist.  I'm actually a 5th generation German-American.  So if you're gonna poke fun at it, try "zeich heil!"
Society does not have the right to discriminate against victims of domestic violence because of their gender."  - www.amen.ie

Peter

It may be worth to do a quick read of the Koran to get a first hand idea of what it proposes.

Another  good source is Little Green Footballs .

Se also:
The Real History of the Crusades By Thomas F. Madden

Quote
Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics.

For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression--an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.

Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed's death.

That is what gave birth to the Crusades.


Put some socialism, feminism, terrorist admiration, general stupidity, antisemitism in a pot and mix:

The Brownshirts of Our Time By Phyllis Chesler
BM-NByw7VE2PwjfTtsVdeE5ipuqx1AqkEv1

Brer Rabbit

Quote from: "Amber"
"Islam is currently holding back people all over the world from achieving freedom, prosperity -- even a life in which they can be guaranteed they won't be plucked off tomorrow by mullahs and killed.  It is the fundamental oppressor of people around the world.  Yet leftists are so insistent on apologizing for it.  The best they can do is say "but Christianity is bad too!"  Ya ... NOT an excuse.  Especially considering Christianity is NOT currently serving as the oppressor of people around the world.  Digging up what happened hundreds of years ago is the best leftists can do.

Can't you see how brainwashed you are???????  There are various leaders who WANT you to apologize for Islam because there are various leaders who WANT the world to be oppressed.  

If you favored human rights - if you favored the liberation of people around the world - if you favored allowing these people, MANY of whom are people of enlightenment and reason, particulary in Iran, to go friggin' to a mall just to shop, or to not have to fear their life every day, or to be able to just go outside in shorts and a shirt as women to enjoy the sunshine - you will be opposed to Islam.  

*Comparing it to the evils of Christianity is NOT an excuse
*Comparing it to what Christians did 100 years ago is NOT an excuse
*Saying it is only people who have a bad interpretation of the Koran is NOT an excuse

Get off your duff.  Wake up.  This religion is evil.  It is responsible for oppression, murder, tyranny.  Develop a goddam moral backbone.  Stand up to this evil, which you - for whatever mind-numbing reason - feel the need to defend.  "




I'm not so sure your hero, Ayn Rand, would agree with you.  :? I always thought that her philosophy opposed the initiation of force.



At any rate, the Libertarian Party, which was, supposedly, created in her image, (wretchedly ugly as it was  :lol: ) has ALWAYS been anti-interventionist in its foreign policy.



Personally, I think "Buzzardboy"'s little "war on terror" is nothing but a CROCK.  It's just about cheap oil and making the Middle East safe for Israeli domination.  :evil:



One question, though, for all you Muslim-bashers: IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION, NAME ME *ONE* CHRISTIAN EUROPEAN COUNTRY IT HAS CONQUERED. Just ONE. Can't do it, huh? So why do you even CARE, then, one way or another? If they're no threat to *US*, (and, believe me, they're *NOT*) then why do you even give a fuck?



The fact of the matter is that most Amerikans never even knew what Islam was, let alone opposed it before the Iranian hostage-taking incidents, back in the late 70's. Then the media started portraying them as bogeymen, as they have been doing ever since. At every possible opportunity, they would show us footage of them burning "our" flag, calling us "The Great Satan", etc.



What they didn't tell us, however, and still refuse to tell us, but what has become painfully obvious to every thinking person, the world over, is this: the *REASON* they did these things was our support for the racist, fascist, Jewish Supremacist state of Israel.



Before we starting doing that, they never made a peep about us, pro, con, or otherwise. And, as I said before, most of us didn't even know they existed.  For the first 171 years of this country's history, they never threatened us in any way, shape, or form. And, had we chosen to heed the sage advice of George Washington, in his Farewell Address, instead of the siren song of Zionism, they never would have.  :x
Just a lesson or two
In the ways of livin'
Let me be forgiven
If I'm guidin' you wrong



Sing for your supper, just remember
At the other end of the spoon,
The guy's workin' for a song." ---Roger Miller. "That's The Way It's Always Been". 1964.

nebulousone

Okay, not really related to this topic but I thought this might be a good place to ask:

A family member would like a copy of The Qu'ran for Christmas.  There are a bazillion interpretations and translations out there.  Do any of you (who are in the know) have a recommendation?

Thanks.
i]Most folks are as happy as they make up their minds to be.[/i]
~Abraham Lincoln

dr e

Welcome Brer Rabbitt.  You have always been one of my favorite story charachters since I was a very little evil. :yes:


The following quote comes from Peter's link below.  It seems that according to this fellow the Muslims had made their way up through Africa and then on to Turkey and were on their way to Europe when the Emperor in Constantinople made his plea to the Europeans to protect them and stop the invasions.  It notes that Palestine, Syria, and Egypt were once Christian and were conquered by the Muslims.  He also says that Spain was also conquered...would you consider Spain an European country?  He frames the Crusades as a defense against an intolerant Muslim world attempting  to rid the world of any religion outside of their own.  I'm no historian and can't verify what this man is saying but if what he says is true that puts a very different spin on the Crusades which have typically been framed in terms of greed and conquest.  In some ways this sort of reframing of the Crusades reminds me of the feminist reframing of men.  



Quote
With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed's death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt--once the most heavily Christian areas in the world--quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

Go Up