Started by Amber, Nov 23, 2003, 11:05 AM
I mention in my article that the purpose of feminism was NOT to create independent women, but to de-sexualize women, i.e. make them unattractive to and unattracted to men. When you look at those pictures, can you deny that? Especially in our capitalist world, is there any reason why a woman should be brutish? Is there a reason why she needs to be physicall strong, tatooed, and good at basketball? Not really. If feminists wanted women to succeed, they would be preaching things like reason, diligence, and excellence. Instead, they are advocating gender bending. The agenda is relatively obvious to me: damage the goods, make women tatooed, fat, whorish, etc., i.e. unattractive to men.
I completely outline in my article and in several responses in this post regarding my view about the relationship between pretty and feminine. If you can't read, it's not my fault.Gawwwwd, am I going to get lectured about being shallow for valuing physical beauty again??? :roll: :blahblah: