Started by Tigerman, May 28, 2009, 05:39 AM
It's just that some people, especially Mr. X, seemed to inject libertarian politics in a divisive manner and I felt obliged to respond to that.
Gonz, I will start replying to your arguments if you can stop the belittling, patronising, lying, and maliciousness.
Let me note, though, that the argument you do give in this post is a faulty syllogism, to wit:Premiss 1. Andrew is a socialist.Premiss 2. Feminism is inherently socialist.Concl. Andrew is a feminist.This is an elementary fallacy.
As for "belittling, patronising, lying, and maliciousness" I have never pretended to be anything but mean as a fucking snake. So as for three out of four, I say, "Dear Pot; Yes I am Black."
The conclusion is that by supporting the goals of feminism you aid and abet feminism,
regardless of whether your anti-feminist protestations are in good faith or not, and as such your proposed solutions are no solutions at all.
The accusation is that you are pushing for a masculist socialism that differs from a feminist socialism only in that your "Jews" have different genitals.
Then you do not belong in a civilised discussion.
Guilt by association.
This doesn't follow, unless you mean by 'no solutions' that they aren't consistent with your vision, which is evident.
I have no idea what this might mean.