Tell me what you think and if there is anything I could add to make it better.
:mrgreen:
Re-Sexualizing Men and WomenI am about to tell you something shocking: heterosexual men are attracted to women and heterosexual women are attracted to men. Even more shocking: heterosexual men are attracted to women who
look like women and heterosexual women are attracted to men who
look like men.
It seems rather common sensical that when a woman draws attention to the fact that she is a woman, a man would desire her more. And, vice versa, when a man acts in a way that emphasizes the fact that he is a man, a woman will become more attracted to him.
It is common sensical, hence such knowledge is not so common. In fact, the current intellectual establishment is dead set on destroying this.
Feminists, and others who are like-minded, are doing everything they can to destroy the attraction between men and women - by making women not look like women and men not look like men.
One major feminist event that happens on campuses nationwide that seems to go either unnoticed or unchallenged, I don't know which, is "Love Your Body Day." Love Your Body Day is a day in which feminists tell women to love their body regardless not fitting up to the so-called oppressive images of beautiful women everywhere in our media.
Most come to the conclusion that feminists are sloth-like and that this day is an attack on healthy qua health. They would argue feminists are lazy, undisciplined, can't handle living up to any kind of standard. I don't think it is. I think it's a malignant plot to destroy the essence of the female figure - destroying it such that men will not be attracted to women.
As proof that feminists are not opposed to health qua health, but rather the female figure itself, in 1998, NOW gave an award to a female body builder for "challenging stereotypes of what it means to be a female." There is little doubt that this woman was in incredible shape. Feminists don't retract in horror to someone who is healthy, but the woman who exudes femininity, which means a woman who actually looks like she is a woman.
This is not to say that a larger woman cannot be feminine and still look like a woman. Plenty of larger women are feminine and, in their own way, attractive. But this is not the kind of woman feminists speak for. There is a certain amorphous shape that feminists idealize - a layer of fat around a woman solely to hide her feminine body.
If you have ever noticed, many normal woman - typical, non-feminist woman - who don't want male attention do one thing: makes themselves look male-like. Or rather, they do something to decrease their sex appeal. I have noticed that when a girl breaks up with a guy and temporarily wants a break from men, she often times cuts her hair short. Or I have known women who have been in situations where they received continuous unwanted attention from a man, say at work, and they purposely gain weight - to thwart the unwanted attention.
Feminists are projecting this phenomenon, which only happens to some girls for short periods of time, unto the population at large.
The other piece of the puzzle of course is: turning men into women. On CBS, a special was done that stated that men bulking up at the gym could be dangerous. Their line was that desiring physical fitness and/or physical attractiveness must necessarily lead to drastic, unhealthy measures such as steroids.
Of course that is the usual line. Any person who has any kind of ideal is smeared by the left as a neurotic perfectionist: women who watch their weight must be anorexics, people who care about their health must be hypochondriacs, etc. But the assault here is on masculinity as such. They don't want men to go to the gym to bulk up (read: become attractive to women), but to remain as androgynous effeminate boys. (That, and the image of the strong masculine male is one of the most hated images by leftists.)
There was only goal of feminists, ever: to divide men and women. The fundamental goal is to make men and women unattractive to each other - turning women into amorphous blobs and men into effeminate wimps.
Feminists' goal was not female independence. Especially in a capitalist world, what need is there for a woman to be like a man? In our technologically based society, success is mostly intellectual. But feminists think in order for a woman to become successful she must reject her femininity: as if femininity and success are opposites. But becoming man-like only serves one purpose for a woman: it desexualizes her.
A woman who embraces and loves the fact that she is a woman - which is the essence of femininity - exudes sexuality. I wrote an article on embracing femininity and womanhood recently, and submitted it to womensnews.org. In it, I talked about the essence of femininity and how a woman who embraces herself as a woman exudes a certain, very attractive youthful glow - even as she approaches old age. Within a half hour, I got an email back saying they would pass on the article. Apparently the women at womennews.org did not like the message of embracing and loving who you are as a woman. The day I sent it in, womensnews.org had an editorial up about a male to female transgender. Apparently, this is womanhood to the womensnews.org website. Let's call feminists for what they are: a bunch of women who hate the fact that they are women.
I say it's time to put these sexless old hags to their grave. They've assaulted sexuality, pleasure and fun long enough. Do something politically incorrect today: be as sexually alluring as humanly possible. Men, get to the gym (especially after that big turkey dinner) and simply
exude masculinity. Women, do something that should come naturally to you but unfortunately does not anymore: love the fact that you are a woman. Don't buy into Love Your Body Day (which makes it hard to love your body), keep yourself trim and most of all
feminine. It's time for a culture of romance, love, and sexuality to come back: a time in which men are men and women are women.
