The Nazi-Feminist Connection

Started by RookhKshatriya, Sep 19, 2009, 04:39 AM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

RookhKshatriya

Marie Stopes, renowned Anglo-Feminist and pioneer of birth-control, was in fact a Nazi. A Nazi is anyone with Nazi beliefs, whether they were card-carrying German Nazis or not. The French FN or British BNP are rightly considered Nazis, even today, long after Hitler's death. Stopes shared key Nazi beliefs - she was thus a Nazi... simple, really.

Stopes may not have been a member of the Nazi party, but her eugenic views were identical: birth control, abortion and so on, to eliminate people she deemed 'unfit'. Had she not lived in the Anglo-Saxon world, but in Nazi Germany, she would undoubtedly have been an active and committed Nazi. There is a difference between a chemical engineer attending an engineering conference in Nazi Germany, and a eugenicist attending a population control conference in Nazi Germany: the former remains politically neutral, the latter is inevitably politically engaged. In fact, many early feminists were racists and eugenicists, a fact long swept under the carpet by the liberal establishment. Virginia Woolf was also a Nazi, not just Stopes! Elite women are natural allies of Nazis and other authoritarian creeps, a fact well born out by history. We need a Nuremburg trial for such subhuman filth.

Interestingly, Gandhi was also a racist who detested black people and thought that only the higher social castes deserved human rights. We think the point is with Stopes that her 'contributions' to birth control were, as a whole, motivated by entirely different aims than is popularly considered. In the case of Plato, Karl Marx and so on, their contributions were not tarnished by their appalling racist/fascist beliefs (Marx was also a racist and anti-Semite), as their real contributions were in unrelated fields such as logic, philosophy or economics (Virginia Woolf admittedly falls into this category); while Stopes' entire contribution was an attempt to legitimate and realize her eugenic, Nazi beliefs.

The whole thrust of puritanical Anglo-American Gentile culture is to set women on pedestals as Saints; when we scratch the surface, however, feminist luminaries are often appalling Nazi bigots, at least as bad as the males that feminism excoriates. Virginia Woolf was also a deranged racist, anti-Semite and eugenicist. It is great fun pointing this out to Anglo-feminist pinheads... as it utterly refutes their claim that a female-run world would be morally superior. Just study the social insects to see clear confirmation of that!

Something we have often considered is that Anglo-American women should be made to attend special classes where their racism, homophobia, sexism and entitlement issues would be discussed as a problematic socio-biological legacy, things they would be made to address rationally as innate problems they suffer from, rather like hereditary mental illnesses. Part of the rights/privileges agenda is that Anglo-American women are insufficiently challenged, as the pedestal they have wrangled for themselves sets them somehow above reproach. That pedestal needs to be removed with the utmost urgency.

Yes, men can be racist too - but the point is that female racism is entirely UNTOUCHED in the media or elsewhere (unlike white working class male racism, for instance). Our quarrel with Anglo-American women hinges on the blind eye turned to their racism, homophobia, socio-political privileges and double standards across the Anglosphere - attitudes that informally constrict the rights of others.
:engel2:
Anglobitch: the site for men who know Anglo-American women suck

Captain Courageous

How does this fit in with the misandry and the megalomania we're seeing more and more nowadays? The website http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm touts Valerie Solanas and her SCUM Manifesto as experiencing a resurgence "all over the web". Judith Sheindlin ("Judge Judy") makes it a point to squeak in, "Women are superior!" on William Shatner's show. Amazonian prototypes are beating up males effortlessly on television and the movies, on a regular basis. Even James Bond has to answer to an old crone, who is later portrayed as the one that actually recruited and trained him (cinematic revisionist history). Where's the Nazi connection in all of this?

dr e


Got any links to back up any of these claims?



Marie Stopes, renowned Anglo-Feminist and pioneer of birth-control, was in fact a Nazi. A Nazi is anyone with Nazi beliefs, whether they were card-carrying German Nazis or not. The French FN or British BNP are rightly considered Nazis, even today, long after Hitler's death. Stopes shared key Nazi beliefs - she was thus a Nazi... simple, really.

Stopes may not have been a member of the Nazi party, but her eugenic views were identical: birth control, abortion and so on, to eliminate people she deemed 'unfit'. Had she not lived in the Anglo-Saxon world, but in Nazi Germany, she would undoubtedly have been an active and committed Nazi. There is a difference between a chemical engineer attending an engineering conference in Nazi Germany, and a eugenicist attending a population control conference in Nazi Germany: the former remains politically neutral, the latter is inevitably politically engaged. In fact, many early feminists were racists and eugenicists, a fact long swept under the carpet by the liberal establishment. Virginia Woolf was also a Nazi, not just Stopes! Elite women are natural allies of Nazis and other authoritarian creeps, a fact well born out by history. We need a Nuremburg trial for such subhuman filth.

Interestingly, Gandhi was also a racist who detested black people and thought that only the higher social castes deserved human rights. We think the point is with Stopes that her 'contributions' to birth control were, as a whole, motivated by entirely different aims than is popularly considered. In the case of Plato, Karl Marx and so on, their contributions were not tarnished by their appalling racist/fascist beliefs (Marx was also a racist and anti-Semite), as their real contributions were in unrelated fields such as logic, philosophy or economics (Virginia Woolf admittedly falls into this category); while Stopes' entire contribution was an attempt to legitimate and realize her eugenic, Nazi beliefs.

The whole thrust of puritanical Anglo-American Gentile culture is to set women on pedestals as Saints; when we scratch the surface, however, feminist luminaries are often appalling Nazi bigots, at least as bad as the males that feminism excoriates. Virginia Woolf was also a deranged racist, anti-Semite and eugenicist. It is great fun pointing this out to Anglo-feminist pinheads... as it utterly refutes their claim that a female-run world would be morally superior. Just study the social insects to see clear confirmation of that!

Something we have often considered is that Anglo-American women should be made to attend special classes where their racism, homophobia, sexism and entitlement issues would be discussed as a problematic socio-biological legacy, things they would be made to address rationally as innate problems they suffer from, rather like hereditary mental illnesses. Part of the rights/privileges agenda is that Anglo-American women are insufficiently challenged, as the pedestal they have wrangled for themselves sets them somehow above reproach. That pedestal needs to be removed with the utmost urgency.

Yes, men can be racist too - but the point is that female racism is entirely UNTOUCHED in the media or elsewhere (unlike white working class male racism, for instance). Our quarrel with Anglo-American women hinges on the blind eye turned to their racism, homophobia, socio-political privileges and double standards across the Anglosphere - attitudes that informally constrict the rights of others.
:engel2:

Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

RookhKshatriya


How does this fit in with the misandry and the megalomania we're seeing more and more nowadays? The website http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm touts Valerie Solanas and her SCUM Manifesto as experiencing a resurgence "all over the web". Judith Sheindlin ("Judge Judy") makes it a point to squeak in, "Women are superior!" on William Shatner's show. Amazonian prototypes are beating up males effortlessly on television and the movies, on a regular basis. Even James Bond has to answer to an old crone, who is later portrayed as the one that actually recruited and trained him (cinematic revisionist history). Where's the Nazi connection in all of this?


That IS the Nazi connection...

:engel2:
Anglobitch: the site for men who know Anglo-American women suck

RookhKshatriya



Got any links to back up any of these claims?



Marie Stopes, renowned Anglo-Feminist and pioneer of birth-control, was in fact a Nazi. A Nazi is anyone with Nazi beliefs, whether they were card-carrying German Nazis or not. The French FN or British BNP are rightly considered Nazis, even today, long after Hitler's death. Stopes shared key Nazi beliefs - she was thus a Nazi... simple, really.

Stopes may not have been a member of the Nazi party, but her eugenic views were identical: birth control, abortion and so on, to eliminate people she deemed 'unfit'. Had she not lived in the Anglo-Saxon world, but in Nazi Germany, she would undoubtedly have been an active and committed Nazi. There is a difference between a chemical engineer attending an engineering conference in Nazi Germany, and a eugenicist attending a population control conference in Nazi Germany: the former remains politically neutral, the latter is inevitably politically engaged. In fact, many early feminists were racists and eugenicists, a fact long swept under the carpet by the liberal establishment. Virginia Woolf was also a Nazi, not just Stopes! Elite women are natural allies of Nazis and other authoritarian creeps, a fact well born out by history. We need a Nuremburg trial for such subhuman filth.

Interestingly, Gandhi was also a racist who detested black people and thought that only the higher social castes deserved human rights. We think the point is with Stopes that her 'contributions' to birth control were, as a whole, motivated by entirely different aims than is popularly considered. In the case of Plato, Karl Marx and so on, their contributions were not tarnished by their appalling racist/fascist beliefs (Marx was also a racist and anti-Semite), as their real contributions were in unrelated fields such as logic, philosophy or economics (Virginia Woolf admittedly falls into this category); while Stopes' entire contribution was an attempt to legitimate and realize her eugenic, Nazi beliefs.

The whole thrust of puritanical Anglo-American Gentile culture is to set women on pedestals as Saints; when we scratch the surface, however, feminist luminaries are often appalling Nazi bigots, at least as bad as the males that feminism excoriates. Virginia Woolf was also a deranged racist, anti-Semite and eugenicist. It is great fun pointing this out to Anglo-feminist pinheads... as it utterly refutes their claim that a female-run world would be morally superior. Just study the social insects to see clear confirmation of that!

Something we have often considered is that Anglo-American women should be made to attend special classes where their racism, homophobia, sexism and entitlement issues would be discussed as a problematic socio-biological legacy, things they would be made to address rationally as innate problems they suffer from, rather like hereditary mental illnesses. Part of the rights/privileges agenda is that Anglo-American women are insufficiently challenged, as the pedestal they have wrangled for themselves sets them somehow above reproach. That pedestal needs to be removed with the utmost urgency.

Yes, men can be racist too - but the point is that female racism is entirely UNTOUCHED in the media or elsewhere (unlike white working class male racism, for instance). Our quarrel with Anglo-American women hinges on the blind eye turned to their racism, homophobia, socio-political privileges and double standards across the Anglosphere - attitudes that informally constrict the rights of others.
:engel2:




Sure, just go to the articles on my website and you can read the same material with benefit of Harvard-Oxbridge footnotes.
Anglobitch: the site for men who know Anglo-American women suck

Captain Courageous

#5
Sep 20, 2009, 10:19 AM Last Edit: Sep 20, 2009, 10:26 AM by Captain Courageous


How does this fit in with the misandry and the megalomania we're seeing more and more nowadays? The website http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm touts Valerie Solanas and her SCUM Manifesto as experiencing a resurgence "all over the web". Judith Sheindlin ("Judge Judy") makes it a point to squeak in, "Women are superior!" on William Shatner's show. Amazonian prototypes are beating up males effortlessly on television and the movies, on a regular basis. Even James Bond has to answer to an old crone, who is later portrayed as the one that actually recruited and trained him (cinematic revisionist history). Where's the Nazi connection in all of this?


That IS the Nazi connection...

:engel2:



I'll consider what you've written for three reasons:

1) Herbert W. Armstrong Jr. (Google him) wrote in 1945 that Germany may have lost
   THIS time, but they were far from utterly defeated and were going 'underground';
2) A former SS officer interviewed on The History Channel scoffed several times during the
   discussion, "Za Voor isn't over!"; and ...
3) In the past year, several travel shows covering South America went to great pains to
   cover the German communities in Chile and Argentina, noting the big influx of
   immigrants occuring at the end of WW II.

They had money, connections and obscurity ... maybe they are influencing things behind the scenes.  :dontknow:
Post Script: Also, Germany had muslim troops fighting for it in The Balkans, and Syria provided the passports and other help to Nazis fleeing Germany at war's end
(maybe an alliance between the two exists to the present day).

dr e


Quote


Sure, just go to the articles on my website and you can read the same material with benefit of Harvard-Oxbridge footnotes.


No thanks.  If you are going to post on this board please leave links here to back up your ideas.
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

Captain Courageous

Rookh, you're a pisser. That's for sure!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Men's Rights Activist

Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Cpl Ferro

Dear Rookh,

Listen to what you're saying:  "subhuman filth" need to be placed in reeducation classes, or perhaps camps?  That rings a bell in my mind somewhere, someone else had that policy.  Name started with an S, or an H, or an M.  If we're going to win against the incipient fascism, we have to win on our terms, not by acting like our enemies.

Harping about Nazis as if Nazis were the real threat is missing the point.  Nazism and Communism are both elements of a greater plan[1] once termed Synarchism.  The problem is one of oligarchic power versus republican power.  The oligarchs, an unofficial confederation of power factions with a common interest in world domination, will and are using everything imaginable to further their agenda, including:

Nazism
Communism
Ecology
Animal Rights
Feminism
New Age "eclectic spirituality"
Political Correctness (including obsessions about racism, etc.)
Rock-drug-sex counterculture
Mass media and videogames
(1)   distraction
(2)   mental retardation
(3)   greed
(4)   hypersexualisation
(5)   political correctness
(6)   cynicism
(7)   false sense of security
Wall Street "casino capitalism"
Free Trade ideology (destruction of barriers to trade and capital)
Free Market society (specifically its toxic cultural effects)
Mainstream politics
(1)   takedown of the physical economy
(2)   neglect of the hard and soft infrastructure ("austerity measures")
(3)   foreign wars (free market, oil, geopolitical disruption, popular distraction)
(4)   destruction of science (NASA, National Weather Service, etc.)
Narco Terrorism
IMF/World Bank/UN
(1)   eating away at Christianity (proposed replacement of the Gregorian calender with a lunar calendar)
(2)   perpetual economic enslavement and disruption of industralising nations
Mass immigration (disruption of national cultural solidarity)

Have I missed any?

Cpl Ferro

[1]
A Short Definition of Synarchism
http://www.larouchepub.com/lar/2003/3031what_is_synarch.html

Go Up