Started by Amber, Nov 02, 2002, 03:05 PM
Politically, the advocacy of Utopian has always comes from the "liberals".
it has been these well intentioned Utopianists who have been responsible for the most inhumane methods of dealing with people. Utopian communists pointed their muzzle at, and killed, countless numbers of innocent people
It has been the socialists, the good intentionists, who have engaged in guilty verdicts without trial
Indeed, liberals tout a perfect society, in self righteous dignation, telling the rest of us to live up to their Utopia
A most common everyday way that this is seen is in liberals refusal to judge things. Liberals can't stand this, they think it is 'mean.' Why can't everyone just love everyone? In a liberal Utopia, everyone should be 'tolerant' of one another.
Ann Coulter writes in her book "Slander" that liberals (exclusively) have turned politics into the bloody sport that it is today. A liberal knows no bounds - your intelligence, your personal life, even your physical looks will be called into question. All this, after begging we all be "tolerant" of one another. Conservatives, as a rule, don't do this
Ms. Clinton is infamous for the day she had lunch at a ritzy restaurant - and didn't leave a tip! Ms. Clinton has also accepted an $8 million dollar publishing contract to write a book on her experiences in the White House. One would think that the adulterous affair that her husband had in front of the entire nation would be a source of shame for a woman
Liberals do not fight ethically, instead they use kamikaze, terrorist methods. In the Vietnam War, the communists resorted to guerilla warfare
Palestinians, currently, use suicide bombers to wage a war against Israel. They also used a terrorist attack against the USA -- by flying two private planes into unsuspecting civilian territory
My own experiences with liberals is that they will exploit whatever they can.
Liberals reject the employer-employee relationship, crying it is exploitive in nature. Trying to reject this relationship, because of its alleged heartlessness
My personal experience is that liberals crave this sort of master-slave relationship
During the Sexual Revolution, many liberals got together and embraced a society in which they could reject the "master-slave" relationships (notice the language they pick!) and instead have "brother-sister" relationships among men and women
The bourgeuosis idea of the male-female relationship is one in which the man is the hero and the woman is the hero-worshipper. The man is the leader, he is the patriarch
Liberals reject the employer-employee relationship, crying it is exploitive in nature
It is reason that the Utopianists lack. The conceptual faculty of man is under constant attack from liberals. Their hatred of man's conceptual faculty runs deep.