What will the Democrats do?

Started by Amber, Dec 14, 2003, 12:37 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

Amber

he men's movement is a hate movement.  

What feminism is to men; the men's rights movement is to women.

Men's rights activists blame misandry for all their problems in the same way that feminists blame the patriarchy.

The only thing men's rights activists are good at is abusing women.  

And you can quote me on that.  :D

Johnny

The dems will sick their lawyers on the Army saying Saddam was 'mistreated' while in custody. Of course, this will make them look like retards but I don't think they really care.
Openly Straight.

Peter

1. Saddam is not in custody. They captured  a double.
2. It is wrong to keep Saddam in custody.
3. Saddam did never exist. The Iraqi president  was all the time a CIA agent.
4. They went to Iraq to get a better president for the USA. Now Saddam will be the security advicer to Bush or will replace him entirely.
BM-NByw7VE2PwjfTtsVdeE5ipuqx1AqkEv1

Daymar

And following their own train of logic they will soon come to the next 'logical' conclusion.

5. Saddamn IS Bush therfore, Bush is Saddam. Aha! We've got you now Bush!

closetrightyNYC

Hee hee....WWDD?  :-D

My guess is they'll probably hunt down the 5 Iraqis who actually miss Saddam, and quote them as the Iraqi majority ("Boo hoo, we want our great leader back, f u George," etc).
acist, Sexist, Anti-Straight
Left-wing Freaks, Stop your Hate!

Sir Jessy of Anti

The dems will probably question where the WMD are.  

Quote from: "Amber"

*HEY HE ISN'T OSAMA!!!!


Well, at least if they do say that, we (royal we) can be assured he and his terror network are a priority (with them).  If that's the case then the dems can't rightly offer any resistance if Bush has plans to take action in other places rooting out Al-Qaeda.  Think this is one case in which any pretense in this area can be used against them.
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Bilbo

Quote from: "Peter"
1. Saddam is not in custody. They captured  a double.
2. It is wrong to keep Saddam in custody.
3. Saddam did never exist. The Iraqi president  was all the time a CIA agent.
4. They went to Iraq to get a better president for the USA. Now Saddam will be the security advicer to Bush or will replace him entirely.




Don't forget all the talk about how we supported Hussein in the 80's, and then segue into Iran-Contra, Unilateralism, lack of U.N. involvement, then Nicaragua, then the "war on women", then the environment, then the booming economy...er....no...get off the economy, then.....

The Dems will never run out of things to complain about.

especially.....

Bush/Cheney in 2004!
It is impossible to reason a man out of something he was never reasoned into in the first place- Swift

"The cardinal principle of judicial restraint--if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more."

Sir Jessy of Anti

I am  nostradamus!  (hehe)


" Saddam's Capture May Aid Bin Laden Search "  
1 hour, 57 minutes ago

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=3&u=/ap/20031214/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan_saddam
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Go Up