"THESE cases were labeled blah blah blah...."
Lest we forget the extremely rare finding of Pronounced Innocent (Duke), in stark contrast to the more common found Not Guilty.
One removes all doubt, (despite ZERO prosecution "data" of the actual criminal offender, or social/professional consequence for subsequent organized liable/slander conspirators, or co-conspirators) while the other leaves room for eternal doubt, and years of "data interpretation", with "Well THAT just means "they" couldn't PROVE their innocence.", a false criteria in Constitutional U.S. jurisprudence, ESPECIALLY for -He said, She said- which has NO place in prosecution in front of an instructed criminal court jury of one's peers, presided over by a judge who apparently needed to be educated on a tropical resort, all expenses paid, junket.
Sure seems to generate a lot of "redistribution of wealth" via. legal/professional fees though.
Of course, I could be wrong...