Court President Lord Phillips said that the law cannot prevent a couple deciding how to arrange their affairs should they come to live apart and that all English courts should follow the precedent.
'In future it will be natural to infer that parties who enter into an ante-nuptial agreement to which English law is likely to be applied intend that effect should be given to it,' he said.
Gee, is that to say a legal
incorporation would serve the interests of BOTH parties involved, provided that after a suitable period of "discovery", BOTH parties are deemed fit to enter into a contract.?
Where have I heard this
new idea before?
This is why I no longer grant credibility to "marriage in the eyes of the court", and especially toward tiresome claims for "gay" marriage. If it's simply all about the Benjamins, assets, and "recognition", then save the wedding party expense, and spend (about) US$150 establishing a (revocable) Limited Partnership.
If ignoring the provisions of "family/civil/divorce" court law turns out to be unacceptable to pumpkin, (or pumpkin's mother, or pumpkin's "advisers"), well then... just give them the prevailing
escort fee,and move on.
Make sure you get a receipt.
