Ummm .... KAL147? My name is Steven, not Dennis. But it's all good. Just so you know, as I do not care if my ID is known, my full name is :
L. Steven Beene II
I can't exactly hide, lol, as I have posted with my full name on many occasion.
But, on topic, I was also disgusted by what you said. I did not find out the sentencing for Jessica Langshaw or her boyfriend. I really am not surprised that the boyfriend got 2 years while Jessica got 1 year. And, lets face it, had the case not become so high profile (should she have accused only 2-5 men), I doubt she would have spent a day in jail.
In most cases where the woman is proven to be a total liar, the press publishes one last piece on the story and this is the last line every time:
"the D.A.'s office is considering bringing charges"
Now, we all know what that really means, but, fuck it, let ME say it: "we will put out the usual obligatory phraseology for the press, and make vague nonobligatory 'threats' about putting the 'victim' in jail."
Now let me break down what is really happening:
The press has been lapping up the ADA's "leaks". The police and the ADA look ONLY for evidence that will convict. Let's face it, even honest cops and ADAs (and there ARE some) are under intense pressure, scrutiny, and they may have political ambitions that the lives of a few innocent men are not going to deter. The man's name is published and the woman's is not. The press interviews and publishes.
When the woman, in this case, is proven to be a total liar, they have to have a closing story. They publish "rape advocates", mitigating circumstances excusing the "victim", and maybe a paragraph from the defense lawyer. But the last, the defense lawyer's statement, is selected and is always the same: "we are glad this ordeal is over". The defense lawyer may have spoken to the press for 20 min, but that is what is printed. Meanwhile the ADA is "considering charges". Funny, they weren't "considering" charges when the man was pulled out of his life, cuffed where ever he was found, and given over for a rigorous interogation. Nope, they are "considering charges". The press know this, I mean, this aint their first time "at the rodeo". They print this lie and never revisit the story again. In reality the ADA, bowing to Feminazi pressure, make excuses for the "victim" and if any charges are filed, they usually involve couseling and community service.
Let's break that down. Does anyone here honestly believe the "counseling" involves ANYTHING like what men are subjected to during the DV "victim empathy" sessions or even like the police interrogation that the falsely accused man went through. Or does she get gentle, understanding mental "healing" for what she must have "gone through" for her to have done this. And does ANYONE here think that if the woman doesn't do her community service that any further charges are brought against her?
See, the problem is that the full stories of what happens to the men who are falsely accused and the women who do it are not told.
Sorry if I rambled on, just thought you guys might want to know.
Steven
