My problem with this is the notion that what he gained, AFTER the failure of the relationship, is somehow hers. Regardless of gender, to which I think I'd be singing to the choir here as to there being a pro-female bias in our courts, is that it clearly shows that:
1) Our legal profession has become (and already is) a clear money making machine for the lawyers
2) That the MAN is somehow a slave to the woman for the rest of his life. That is not hyperbole. A wife is, ideally, a life partner who shares in all the good and bad, and with whom an intimate relationship is shared. There is no intimate relationship, and she shares in (nor is obligated to be around for) any of the rough days he may have. He is therefore, for all intents and purposes her slave. He must give of what he has, with no reciprocal expectations, nor with them having any mutually supportive relationship.
Steven
