Women's Funding Network study is junk

Started by FP, Mar 24, 2011, 10:41 AM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

FP

science...  No way!  :laughing6:

"Schapiro Group data wasn't questioned by mainstream media"

http://www.villagevoice.com/2011-03-23/news/women-s-funding-network-sex-trafficking-study-is-junk-science/

"....The congressmen heard testimony from half a dozen nonprofit executives and law enforcement officials. But the most alarming words of the day came from Deborah Richardson, the chief program officer of the Women's Funding Network. She told legislators that juvenile prostitution is exploding at an astronomical rate.

"An independent tracking study released today by the Women's Funding Network shows that over the past six months, the number of underage girls trafficked online has risen exponentially in three diverse states," Richardson claimed. "Michigan: a 39.2 percent increase; New York: a 20.7 percent increase; and Minnesota: a staggering 64.7 percent increase."...

LSBeene

And, once again - the spread the "harmless lie for the greater good" brigade steps up to the plate.

But, but, but, .... women and ESPECIALLY feminists NEVER lie about subjects when it relates to sex, sexual abuse, or the abuse of women (to get funding).

And why do they keep doing it?

Because NO ONE EVER GOES TO JAIL FOR PERJURY.  They step up to the plate, swing, and if they miss, next month it's some other professional gender scam artist from ANOTHER gov't funded group that comes up with ANOTHER "shocking statistic".

I mean, besides "official cat box cleaner" - what can one do with a Womyn's Studies degree without being involved in the grievence industry?

Steven
'Watch our backs at home, we'll guard the wall over here. You can sleep safe tonight, we'll guard the door."

Isaiah 6:8
"Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!"

Go Up