Evil Google search algorithm: kids is a synonym for boys but not girls

Started by The Invisible Male, Sep 23, 2011, 07:45 AM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

The Invisible Male

Apparently search engines are using subtle tactics in the War Against Boys.  I'm going to email Christina Hoff Sommers about this obfuscation tactic, since she is working on a 2nd edition of her seminal book.  Google the terms (without quotes) foster boys percent and look through the first ten results.  Only one of the ten results actually shows the word boys in bold type in the snippet.  The rest show the word kids in bold type, an alternative search term that was obviously set by someone at Google and not specified in my search query.  To prove this is the case, just search foster girls percent and you'll see that kids is not a substitute term for girls.  Only the word girls is in bold type in those results, not kids. 

The only motivation I see for this subtle but nefarious search algorithm is that Google has a feminist agenda (like Wikipedia) and feels that searching for anything regarding boys' issues or topics is verboten.  Girls must always be included even when trying to do something just for boys.  (eg, Big Brothers organization is now Big Brothers/Big Sisters, Boys Clubs of America is now Boys & Girls Clubs, YMCA is now officially called the Y). 

I first noticed this Google algorithm when searching for martial arts classes for my son to see if there are any classes just for boys.  It was like looking for a needle in a haystack, combing through the hundreds of results that only mentioned kids karate, which I think is Google's objective.  They wouldn't be so brazen as to not give any results with the search term boy, so they'll just bury those results with the gender neutral term and make the information harder to find.  As a side note, I noticed that below a certain age, you can find plenty of sports classes just for girls, but almost none just for boys.

Today's news story about Rick Santorum vs Google has a quote that is now clearly disingenuous: "Google's search results are a reflection of the content and information that is available on the Web," says spokesman Gabriel Stricker.  The Google spokesman says it is not their problem to fix the pornographic search results that come up with Rick Santorum's name, results that were rigged by a gay activist, but Google will clearly go out of their way to rig results themselves to obfuscate any searches for boys topics.
The Invisible Man is an 1897 sci-fi novella by H.G. Wells.  The protagonist cannot become visible again, becoming mentally unstable as a result.

Men's Rights Activist

I no longer use Google.  I'm not sure it's any better, but I now use Bing.
Life, Liberty, & Pursuit of Happiness are fundamental rights for all (including males), & not contingent on gender feminist approval or denial. Consider my "Independence" from all tyrannical gender feminist ideology "Declared" - Here & Now!

Peter

#2
Sep 25, 2011, 12:18 AM Last Edit: Sep 28, 2011, 12:37 AM by Peter
You can also use

https://ixquick.com/
https://duckduckgo.com/                      
https://duckduckgo.com/html/                    No  javascript
https://ssl.scroogle.org/


Some explanations:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Ixquick
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Duckduckgo



Also note the https:// in all the links. That mean that you are not sharing your secrets with your ISP and others on the route.

Is is even possible with Google, https://encrypted.google.com/ , but it may be somewhat pointless, as Google is the main privacy violator anyway.




See also:

https://ssd.eff.org/
BM-NByw7VE2PwjfTtsVdeE5ipuqx1AqkEv1

dr e

Thanks for these Peter.  Great to try an alternative to google.   Google is simply getting too big and too powerful and are not looking user friendly.... :rolle:
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

CG9603

There is also Scroogle  www.scroogle.org

See also Starting Page
"A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both."
-- General Dwight D.  Eisenhower. 

"Be bold and courageous.  When you look back on your life, you'll regret the things you didn't do more than the ones you did."
-- Unknown.

Bobby

I have always blindly used google; but like two weeks ago, I was investigating something that would probably be considered ¨controversial¨( I can´t even remember now what it was; if it comes to me I will post). I just couldn´t get anything worthwhile on the topic. Then out of frustration, I remembered to try bing and all of the first page was good; I knew there had to be information out there. I am suspicious of google too.
A different approach to different times; Independent

Everytime you feel trapped in a feminst dystopia, just repeat this mantra to yourself: "there are 3.1 billion women on earth"; SIGE

Go Up