The Canadian Constitution is a cautionary tale. It was rewritten in 1982 and explicitly forbids discrimination based on gender or race. Feminists and non-white groups protested that they would have to stop their good work of redressing historical injustice.
So escape clauses were added allowing discrimination, but only against men & boys and also against whites.
Discrimination is now enshrined in our constitution. That would likely be the result in the US as well.
See: Original US Supreem Court citation of Affirmative Action.
Apparently this now means it's OK to discriminate AGAINST unprotected groups of folk by virtue of of "failings" of "oppressed" folk. Somehow this is justified by the obvious Desparate Impact
in equality of outcome. Uncommitted women, minority, non-tax payers, and THEIR children, children hardest hit...
We call it "diversity", except there doesnt seem to be any room for "awareness" of Athletic Straight White Males, of ANY age, in the National Conversation
. Apparently the concept of Democracy has been disgarded as inconvieniant, ironically, most so by those who register
as teem "Democrat".
"Democrats" demand special(a la Communism), UNMERITED consideration for minority stakeholders.
"Liberals" demand more gub'mint intervention.
"Progressives" protest and obstruct economic growth, and desperately cling to disingenuous "interpretations" of the near and distant past.
"Feminists" cite equality
, with additional "Justifiable Homicide"
considerations, only with the same "special considerations" for the hysterical
(vagina centric or other) that the detested "Chivalry" once assured.
Note: Hysterical does NOT mean "funny", DESPITE ignorant common "usage".