Need help on Sustainability Project on India's Mens Rights

[Pacman7331]

I have a sustainability capstone, that has turned into a feminist and women gender's studies class (just like every class at ASU). In the course is a rabid feminist bitch who is against me and a female teacher with a chivalrous pretentious prick mass of male peers.

I have the task of producing issues regarding the Men's Rights Movement in India, after being casted out and laughed at for bringing up the topic and whitewashed as talking about a country where men are overprivleged and oppressive of women etc. etc. all the jargon and chivalry observed...

Anyhow I need ya'lls help to identify Men's rights issues and equity issues that pertain to men in India and SPECIFICALLY New Delhi. I also specifically need issues that are related to urban farming, and sustainability, these would be employment, food, shelter, water access, health, can also be policy issues and laws as well, really anything but the closer to the land and farming the better...

They are trying to shut me out of the class and paint the word loser across my forehead (as i'm sure you all have experienced when bringing up MRM topics) So I need ya'lls help in finding facts and issues that the MRM over in India deals with, again if they are associated with urban farming thats the best, but anything will do. I need the most official looking bullshit you can find, because these fuckers are gonna reject EVERYTHING I put on the table as: "not credible" no matter what.

I know about these two sites:

http://www.saveindianfamily.org
http://www.confidareindia.com

And I've read at least one peer review article where it cites how male migrant workers are often left on the streets in slums to sleep, and have no shelters.

ANY help would be GREATLY appreciated.

Again this is me doing MRA work officially for a CLASS at ASU in sustainability!

I need to put it to the mam big time!
This is my last and capstone class at ASU I want to leave with a bang for the MRM!

[CaptDMO]

You can start by getting your distractors to agree, define (and defend) what exactly is "credible" source, and what is not.
BEFORE you slap them in the face with their own positions.
HINT:
Wikipedia is NOT a "credible" source. Nor is anything even remotely associated with General Electric/AOL (ie. MSNBC/Huffington Post)
Nor is "Latest university studies indicate..."
Nor is ANY "source" historically associated with "Jurno-List", or it's current manifestations. 

The India Times seems to be the largest circulation  "news" source there, but I have no idea if it "caters" to any particular demographic or not (like the NY, and London, Times unquestionably do) Consider a daily news feed from them.

You might ALSO point out that, as students, by definition they are still "learning", so how do they claim "authority" in the foundation of their "instinctive" and "emotional" (aka-UNintellectual) dismissals? You might also demonstrate that absent peer reviewed theses, subsequently recognized by Internationally recognized institutions, "professorship" by NO means makes the teacher an intellectual authority on the subject either, but THAT'S probably dangerous ice to skate on.
(Got me thrown out of an Anthro-sociology of Architecture course once)     

Off the top of my head, I'd say The Independant Institute, (but their "foreign" expertise tends to be in Central/South American issues) and maybe a chat with the nice folks at appropriate Embassies in India (you'd be supprised how easy/helpful they can be to simply call up and chat with-research the "staff" first)
Knowledge from the nice folk at Foreign Affairs can be gleaned/extrapolated, with a grain of salt, through the (clearly Liberal professional Academic thesis-defense)bullshit/fluff.

BE ADVISED: None of the sources I've suggested are pro/con YOUR (I imagine) position as far as I know. They're mostly "Just the facts maam...". The ones I tinkled on have all PROVED to fall between sophist, and outright intentionally disingenuous.

(That was um..."civil", wasn't it?)   

[Captain Courageous]

Sorry for the delay in responding Pac.

FACEBOOK is awash with MRA's from India. I have them befriending me every single day. May I recommend a few? PM me.

Get on FB and start posting MRA stuff. They'll find you. BTW, some great articles and posters will be provided to you. These guys are eager to interact.

[Pacman7331]

Nah, I got off facebook a while back. I'll have to find some other way of researching the topic...

Someone suggested looking at death rates for men, death rates I think will help, as well as suicide rates.


http://www.malestudies.org/pdf/kumar.pdf

Thank god for Male Studies...

[Pacman7331]

Zachary Morris
SOS 494
Professor Rimjhim


   Gender warfare and discrimination degrades public harmony and undermines the very seed of society at all levels, which is the harmonious relationship between opposing genders.
   India has had a unique receptivity to the men's rights movement, unlike other nations whose media often instinctively responds with estrangement, outrage, ridicule and accusation to men's rights activism. India's men's rights movement has somewhere around thirty thousand members today, and help lines in many major cities across India. It has rapidly grown in the past decade, and is a nascent uprising against human rights violations and gender discrimination (Kumar, 2011).    
   "The Indian Judicial system is already dysfunctional with more than 30 million pending court cases. Breakdown of age old family system due to harmful state policies made under feminist pressure can lead to increase in crime rates and mental health problems... One of the aims of men's rights movement in India is to make the Government establish a National Commission for Men and a separate Ministry for improvement of condition of males. Another area of interest is establishment of Male Studies courses and departments in Indian Universities" (Kumar, 2011).   While the constitution of India is written stating that nobody can be discriminated on the basis of gender, laws which violate that limitation holding that only men can be perpetrators of rape and women only victims, dowry laws, sexual offenses, and laws protect "the modesty of women" whereas nothing is mentioned of "the modesty of men" (Sharma, 2013)
   Gender dynamics in India are old and ancient and passed down through cultural stories. Men in India are often in the past and present seen as protectors of women, obligated to give up their lives to help women if necessary. "Protector day" is celebrated every year in India.  An Indian cultural story of King Shantanu in the epic Mahābhārata tells of how the king does a wrong for breaking a promise never to question his wife's actions even when murdering her own children (Desphande, 2013). 
   "A dowry is the money, goods, or estate that a woman brings to a marriage.[1] (A dowry consisting mainly of linen and clothing, or the contents of a hope chest is called a trousseau.) Dowry contrasts with bride price, which is paid by the groom or his family to the bride's parents, and with dower, which is property given to the bride herself by the groom at the time of marriage" (Dowry, 2013)"
    Dowries were progressively outlawed in India in the 20th century (The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, 2013, however misuse of anti-dowry laws by women, in lieu of Section 498a of the Indian Penal Code have been a problem in India. "According to this law, if a woman goes to police and complains of mental and physical harassment by her husband and his parents, siblings and relatives, then all the accused are presumed to be guilty until proven innocent and are jailed without evidence or investigation"  (Kumar, 2011). While then nonetheless more than 90% of the accused are found to be not guilty. (Kumar, 2011).
   The Dowry death law Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, "considers any unnatural death of a woman within 7 years of marriage as dowry death - meaning it assumes the husband and his relatives as guilty for her death and they are put behind bars immediately (Desphande, 2013).
   According to Nagendar Sharma reporting for the Hindustian Times, "Only men can be booked for rape" regardless of the fact that men can also be raped violently by women (Sharma, 2013) (Cuspis, 2013) (National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, 2010). "The government is also expected to propose enhanced jail terms for those found guilty of outraging the modesty of women and using obscene gestures or words against them" (Sharma, 2013). Women's organizations have lobbied to the exclusion of men under the protection under the law (Sharma, 2013). The minimum penalty for rape under this law is 20 years and the death penalty if the matter is more serious (Cuspis, 2013).
   Misandry and false statistics is also a problem in India where Indian feminists report numbers of victimizations of women that strongly diverges with the National Crime Records Bureau (Kumar, 2011).   
   Indian courts rarely recognize the role of the father in the upbringing of children, when partners therefore divorce and custody battles over the children follow, there are instances where fathers are only allowed to see their own children once a month for 30-60 minutes (Kumar, 2011).
   Parental abduction of children is also a problem for Indian men living in the US, Canada or Europe who have their children taken away from them back to India, US, Canadian or European court orders are usually countered by false charges of dowry harassment. (Kumar, 2011).
   Male victims of domestic abuse and suicide rarely get support or protection, police often refuse to take complaints, men often tolerate abuse under fear of a dowry harassment false accusation, which also imprisons his family of origin. Male suicides are on the rise where eighteen thousand compared with eleven thousand women commit suicide due to "family problems". The suicides of married men and women are much higher, but again here higher for men (Kumar, 2011).
   "According to the National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs - 62,433 married men and a total of 87,839 men committed suicide in 2011 -- and this figure is increasing every year. The same bureau report shows that 92% of all crime happens against men and the society is still not even considering issues of men as a topic worth attention" (Desphande, 2013).   
(Kumar, 2011)

   "Slap your alcoholic or wife-beating husband in public and get a cash reward of Rs 1,000 per whack -- up to a maximum of Rs 10,000" this was or is an 'incentive scheme' an Andhra Pradesh minister is offering harassed wives in his constituency (Radhakrishna, 2011). The more beating the more money, indeed it appears "the more a culture embraces special treatment of women, the more draconian they invariably become against men." (Elam, 2012).
   " 'Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both", reads Section 509 of the Indian Penal Code... Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code prescribes a maximum sentence of two years in prison to a person convicted for outraging the modesty of a woman" (Challa, 2010).
   Misandry in the media denigrating men, encouraging slapping kicking and punching men as laudable acceptable and humorous behavior is also common in India (Challa, 2010).
   Women are given their own private travel compartments, and ticket lines, for public transport such as busses and trains usually seating in the front half, men cannot sit in these seats and if they do they are sometimes beaten by women (Sharma, 2013) (Women only passenger car, 2013) (Men are beaten, 2010). There has been at least one instance of a man being physically thrown off a moving train "by a constable for boarding the ladies compartment" who was then taken to a hospital to recover (PTI, 2010), the rampant hostility towards men shown in the cited videos allude to the fact that these incidents are not uncommon (Men Beaten, 2010).
   Like in the west in India there is also gender discrimination in the form of price fixing for entry into clubs whereas women are given free admission and men must pay higher prices for entry (Sharma, 2013).
   Public outrage of victimization of women does not stop short of calling for the victimization of men like public beating and castration (Sharma, 2013). When famous women cry rape and then recant, public outage is only afforded to the accused and never the false accuser (Sharma, 2013).
   As you can see here there is an exhaustion of men's inequity issues in India. How is this a sustainability problem? As my thesis stated, gender warfare and discrimination degrades public harmony and undermines the very seed of society itself at all levels, which is: the relationship between male and female.  In Matthew 12:25 it says: "Every kingdom divided against itself is headed for destruction, and no city or house divided against itself will stand" (Holman Christian Standard Bible, 2003). Many of these issues carry health, policy, social or cultural, equity, discrimination, implications which thus put undue stress on institutions which seek the elevation of women over men, instead of equality on behalf of both by government policy and city infrastructures. This wastes resources, time, money, and efficiency, degrades the quality of life, both public and private. What these above examples illuminate is an extreme sort of cultural prejudice against males in India. This I would suggest is also mirrored in the lack of coverage of these mentioned issues in the literature assigned to this course; in so far I've seen (although one suggested male migrant workers lack sufficient housing in New Delhi) which carries a heavy gynocentric feminist party line of rhetoric. India's prejudice causes needless conflict and reduces efficiency of society and can even bring it to a crisis undermining business as usual, fostering political corruption as tribal or power politics pervade rather than the service of all by a just unbiased government mediator which is it's responsibility. Legitimacy of government is also undermined in times of oppression of a class or group or even individual. Government oppression causes crime rates to increase and the criminal justice system to be stagnated as suggested by the research. Non-representation and support of collective and individual citizens, who are kept oppressed rather than served by government will not further governmental power or effectiveness but in fact plant the seed of it's own dissolution and disunity. 
   The possible absence of this information in our assigned reading for this class mainly consisting of peer reviewed articles does not prove the incredibility of these men's issues as critics of the opposing narrative may suggest, and in fact suggests the contrary: the incredibility of these sources of information on the issues of men's rights and equity if not the topic of gender itself. Owing to the fact that this information illuminates an extreme bias, and power conflict sponsored by government policy itself: the standard of legitimacy in any society, suggests such interests may run quite deep nationally if not internationally.
   Whether you believe my research or not, it's critical that it be recognized the destructiveness of gender discrimination in government policy. Inequality in society cannot be remedied by creating greater inequality on one side of the scale to correct it. Such simple-minded strategies do pay no respect to the complexity of social issues, notwithstanding the patriarchy theory offered and popularized by the now dominant feminist establishment.
   All laws must be made gender neutral and audited off the books for gender-neutral enforcement. That is there may be biases acculturated at one level or another in India, however where it concerns government jurisdiction such biases must be not written or accounted for in government policy or attempted to be corrected. Doing so violates the non-partisan purpose of government: which is to serve all not lend particular advantages to any group or individual. It is up to NGOs to invest their own interests in ameliorating what they see to be particular inequality. Writing inequality into government policy to correct for inequality will not in fact correct it, but only exacerbate and twist it into an even more monstrous kind of inequality, increasing crime, violence and conflict in society. Universal equality is not an appropriate abstraction to apply to human affairs, men and women can only be equal under the law, any attempt to force equality through affirmative action, violation of individual or collective rights creates discrimination and conflict at an even deeper level, in the long run it will not produce fruitful results, and it has shown to be quite destructive so far and getting worse.
   Two wrongs don't make a right. You can change a government policy overnight but a culture and people especially to the likes of India: one of the most ancient civilizations, cannot be changed suddenly, but only reformed by gentle gradual unceasing influence over long periods of time. Private advantages of women can be sold through NGOs, businesses, private organizations etc. but government must shrug off any unequal special pandering to any particular interests men or women. If not, there will be never ending power struggle and dehumanization as you have already seen. As of now we live in a global society that has tried these measures and the crisis and problems that exist today as headlines on the news are the result. Politics cannot be a football game one team versus another; that is not a civilization that is a brawl.
   More research will be done on how these gender issues affect more mundane sustainability issues such as water, waste, food, resources, urban farming, and closing the urban loop etc.
















References
   
Challa, U.  (2010) The modesty of man. A Voice for Men. Retrieved from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-governance-feminism/the-modesty-of-man/

Cuspis, D. (2013) Indian government: men don't matter. A Voice for Men. Retrieved from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/indian-government-men-dont-matter/

Desphande. A. (2013) Misandry in India. A Voice for Men. Retrieved from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/misandry-in-india/

Dowry (2013) Wikipedia. Retrived from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowry

Elam, P. (2012) Reaching out to India. A Voice for Men. Retrieved from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/reaching-out-to-india/

Holman Christian Standard Bible, (2003) Holman Bible Publishers, 127 Ninth Avenue North, Nashville, Tennessee 37234. ISBN: 1-58640-108-4.

Kumar. A (2011) Men's movement in India: story of Save Indian Family movement. Bangalore, India. Foundation for Male Studies. 333 Mamaroneck Avenue - 444 White Plains, NY 10605. Retrieved from: http://www.malestudies.org/pdf/kumar.pdf

Men are beaten up by women in train, India- travelling in women compartments - Shame (2010) YouTube. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxJRxFMjDUk

Men Beaten off Womans train in Deli India emanzipation in indien (2010) YouTube. Retrieved from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XcPFz_wzu4k

National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (2010) Centers for Disease Control. 4770 Buford Hwy, NE
MS F-63
Atlanta, GA 30341-3717. Retrived from: http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/nisvs/

PTI (2010) Constable 'throw' passenger out of moving train. The Times of India. Retrived from: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-15/kolkata/28244162_1_constable-ladies-compartment-train

Radhakrishna, G. S. (2011) Slap hubby, win Rs 1000 - minister starts scheme for harassed wives. The Telegraph. Retrived from: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110926/jsp/nation/story_14554827.jsp

Sharma, A. (2013) A passage from India. A Voice For Men. Retrieved from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/a-passage-from-india/

The Dowry Prohibition Act , 1961 (2013) The Anti dowry Movement. Retrieved from:  http://www.antidowry.org/dp-act-1961.html

Women only passenger car (2013) Wikipedia. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-only_passenger_car

Any suggestions?

[neoteny]

Not bad, not bad.

1) "the very seed of society at all levels": although very PC sounding, "fabric of society" is better here, I think. Furthermore, what kind of "levels" are referenced? Economic classes?

2) "As you can see here there is an exhaustion of men's inequity issues in India." I'm not sure I understand this sentence. Maybe you wanted to say "surfeit" instead of "exhaustion"?

[Pacman7331]

well i sortave look at in in a occult way, male and female being metaphors of all phenomena. Also, male and female are the seed of human life. As a human being you will either be in relationship to a male or female. Employers, merchants, buisnesses, industries, institutions, government, customers, family memers, society itself, is made up of either a male or a female, will be dealing with males or females, therefore this is the seed of the human collective, it is the building block of any human society, it is the unit of totality... its is more basic than racial or cultural differnces... internal conflict at this level will therefore penetrate all sectors or levels of society.

[Pacman7331]

Doing my final draft of my paper for this class... it's never gonna be good enough... here is my work so far:

There are seven layers of city structures immersed in the New Dehli region, before New Delhi was constructed. The old regions of the city contrast disharmoniously with the newer regions in response to the British construction of New Delhi, deliberate segregation ensued. Pakistani refugees also emigrated into New Dehli in 1947. In 1950's government built housing estates for it's employees which are segregated from the other working population, in a hierarchical manner. 1975 - 1977 hundreds of thousands of families were relocated to resettlement colonies from slum areas. Areas of the city written in the Delhi Master Plan are sectioned off for urban agriculture, while unauthorized settlements are sometimes demolished. Today New Delhi has many various urban centers. Wealthy and powerful people often reside in urban centers whereas the the lower status people reside on the fringes and urban periphery. The poorer populations are usually residing in the older sections of the city. The underprivileged are usually of a low caste status and still subject to social ostracism. (V. Dupont, 2004, p. 169).
   In recent decades there has been a movement of "upper-classes to move to the outskirts of the metropolis, in farmhouses and posh residential complexes that have developed south of the Delhi Territory and attracted well-off families in search of a better living environment" (V. Dupont, 2004, p. 163).
   The possibility of reaching an inclusive multi-stakeholder agreement between various parties may be challenging due to social balkanization. While due process, redress of complaints, and the respect of basic individual rights of all in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations can assist in reducing social balkanization by establishing and equitable standard uniting all members of society. Rights of the individual that cannot be voted away are needed for minority and individual protection that institutions may not infringe on natural law and will of human beings though the collective society. "Group rights have historically been used both to infringe upon and to facilitate individual rights and the concept remains controversial" (Bisaz, C., 2012, p. 7-12). Groups are made up of individuals therefore the notion of gaining rights by forming a party is illusory and contrary to natural law. A person is not legally obligated to be regulated unless consenting through recognized legal contract, therefore only institutions can regulate their own affairs, without infringing on natural and human rights. Groups can only have legally binding authority created by the consent of the will of individuals within it. Collectives require the legal consent and contract of individuals in order for them be a subject to collective authority, and cannot be coerced otherwise without individual human rights being violated (article 20, 12, and 29,UDHR). Group rights exceeding these limitations, can result in a form of authoritarian control and oppression against individual freedom and equality under the law, while furthermore such arbitrary rules not represented by individuals results in a loss of faith and moral to the rule of law or order of society, therefore initiates the process of undermining it . "Much of the recent political discourse on individual rights in the People's Republic of China, particularly with respect to due process rights and rule of law, has focused on how protection of individual rights actually makes social control by the government more effective. For example, it has been argued that the people are less likely to violate the law if they believe that the legal system is likely to punish them if they actually violated the law and not punish them if they did not violate the law. By contrast, if the legal system is arbitrary then an individual has no incentive to actually follow the law (Individual and group rights, 2012).
   "India has an extensive system of affirmative action quotas or reservations intended to redress historical inequalities of opportunity, especially the legacy of caste system" (Individual and group rights, 2012). This sort of strategy of using discrimination to correct discrimination is philosophically flawed as practicing that which it opposes. Equality under the law is violated by affirmative action and thus those in party to them is then working not as a solution to discrimination but a exacerbating force, of that very same exclusion. Special rights or privileges violate the universal standard of equality under the law, as suggested in the Universal Declaration of Human rights Article 1 and 7 (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948) and the philosophy of the rule of law in general. Equality under the law is a system of order, which when violated breeds disorder, mistrust of authority, secret agreements, flattery, cruelty, inhumanity and corruption in general. "Make everyone equal under the law" (Mei Yaochen, 1002-1060 Sun Tzu, The Art of War).
   Gender inequity is a complex controversial and three dimensional equation. Gender is at the root of human experience and society itself and is universal, therefore any sustainable development plan should therefore employ universal gender neutral policies allow equal opportunity and justice and reserve these organizations the right to make judgments on behalf of criterion irrelevant to gender only pertaining to the ability of that person to meet the responsibilities required. This means policy and law apply to both women and men boys and girls, whereas specification of gender is therefore irrelevant and superficial to the meaning of any law or policy.
   Gender warfare and discrimination degrades public harmony and undermines the very seed of society at all levels: "The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State." (Article 16-3, UDHR), the family is the harmonious relationship between opposing genders of which humans are born out of nature and natural law.    Gender warfare and discrimination degrades public harmony and undermines the very seed of society itself, which affects society at all levels for it being based on standards of social behavior between individuals which is strongly and firstly influenced by family upbringing. Ancient wisdom suggests: "Every kingdom divided against itself is headed for destruction, and no city or house divided against itself will stand" (Holman Christian Standard Bible, 2003). Disunity and conflict, can lead to social problems. Fatherlessness for example increases chances of: suicide, rape, homelessness, behavioral disorders, high school dropouts, chemical abuse, juvenile crime (Getting Men Involved,1997)  Gender issues carry health, policy, social or cultural, equity, discrimination, implications and relevancy which puts stress on institutions which use complex inequitable standards that discriminate on the basis of gender instead of simply chartering equality on behalf of both within government policy and non-government public institutions. Inequity of social policy between genders unnecessarily complicates matters, wastes resources, time, money, and efficiency, degrades the quality of life, both public and private by planting the seed of social strive in society. Not only women but men as well are discriminated against according to the situation in India. In India there are separate men's and women's movements and advocacy groups, and as with any social balkanization of men and women. While many journals have now included women's issues, they have tended to ignore those of men when discussing gender. Men however do suffer from discrimination in general as well as in India as examples below will provide.
(Kumar, 2011).

   Public outrage of victimization of women does not stop short of calling for the victimization of men like public beating and castration (Sharma, 2013). When famous women cry rape and then recant, public outage is only afforded to the accused and never the false accuser (Sharma, 2013).
   Women are given their own private travel compartments, and ticket lines, for public transport such as busses and trains usually seating in the front half, men cannot sit in these seats and if they do they are sometimes beaten by women (Sharma, 2013) (Women only passenger car, 2013) (Men are beaten, 2010). There has been at least one instance of a man being physically thrown off a moving train "by a constable for boarding the ladies compartment" who was then taken to a hospital to recover (PTI, 2010), the rampant hostility towards men shown in the cited videos allude to the fact that these incidents are not uncommon (Men Beaten, 2010).
   "Slap your alcoholic or wife-beating husband in public and get a cash reward of Rs 1,000 per whack -- up to a maximum of Rs 10,000" this was or is an 'incentive scheme' an Andhra Pradesh minister is offering harassed wives in his constituency (Radhakrishna, 2011). The more beating the more money, indeed it appears "the more a culture embraces special treatment of women, the more draconian they invariably become against men." (Elam, 2012).
   Male migrant workers seeking work opportunities have "extremely precarious" residential opportunities. "Thus, at night many of them are found sleeping under the verandas in bazaars, on pavements and other open grounds, or in night shelters run by the municipality for homeless people" (V. Dupont, 2004, p. 162).
   While the Constitution of India is written stating that nobody can be discriminated on the basis of gender, laws which violate that limitation holding that only men can be perpetrators of rape and women only victims, dowry laws, sexual offenses, and laws further protect "the modesty of women" (Sharma, 2013).
   These examples are included to simply dispel any illusion of the inequity between genders that exist on both sides rather than. Gender inequality is a complex and three dimensional equation and should be treated with care. Both men's and women's advocacy groups should be consulted by institutions for awareness of these protean issues.
   Prejudice causes needless conflict and reduces efficiency of society and can even bring it to a crisis undermining business as usual, fostering political corruption as tribal or power politics pervade rather than the service of all by a just unbiased government mediator which is it's responsibility. Legitimacy of government is also undermined in times of oppression of a class or group or even individual. Government oppression causes crime rates to increase and the criminal justice system to be stagnated as suggested by the research. Non-representation and support of collective and individual citizens, who are kept oppressed rather than served by government will not further governmental power or effectiveness but in fact plant the seed of it's own dissolution and disunity.
    Inequality in society cannot be remedied by creating greater inequality on one side of the scale to correct it. Such simple-minded strategies do pay no respect to the complexity of social issues. All laws must be made gender neutral and audited. That is there maybe biases and inequalities in culture at one level or another in India, but government has no legal jurisdiction over culture, attempting to correct for perceived cultural matters with special privileges and statues within institution of government or otherwise, contradicts the rule of law and equality and increases instances of discrimination. NGOs can invest their private interests in ameliorating what they see to be particular inequality, while writing inequality into government policy to correct for inequality will not in fact correct it, but only exacerbate and twist it into an even more monstrous kind of inequality, increasing crime, violence and conflict in society (Horn, 2013) (Kumar, 2011)
   Universal equality is not an appropriate abstraction to apply to human affairs, men and women can only be equal under the law, natural law creates each individual unique, any attempt to force equality through actions based on outcomes do not penetrate to the root cause and simultaneously violate individual rights and equality under the law creating discrimination and conflict at an even more artificial level.
   Gender dynamics in India are old and ancient and passed down through cultural stories. Men in India are often in the past and present seen as protectors of women, obligated to give up their lives to help women if necessary. "Protector day" is celebrated every year in India.  An Indian cultural story of King Shantanu in the epic Mahābhārata tells of how the king does a wrong for breaking a promise never to question his wife's actions even when murdering her own children (Desphande, 2013). 
   Again gender inequity is a complex and three dimensional equation, it cannot be remedied through practicing discrimination in effort to remove that same discrimination, as that is a logical contradiction. Making this argument and recommendation is difficult given the paucity of studies by NGOs or government institutions on the discrimination agains men genders face rather than just women. Given however the climate of discrimination against men and the women's and men's movement within India, it is reasonable to suggest a all inclusive response on behalf of institutions through gender neutral policies for the reasons stated above. India's men's rights movement has somewhere around thirty thousand members today, and help lines in many major cities across India. It has rapidly grown in the past decade, and is a nascent uprising against human rights violations and gender discrimination (Kumar, 2011).