Men SHOULD be afforded anonymity in rape trials

Started by mens_issues, Jun 09, 2013, 07:24 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

AnubisRox

For a well written and objective article they sure didn't allow many comments. Hmmm, maybe because it was actually objective???
ell she turned me into a NEWT!! A newt?! Er..., well I got better.

neoteny

The ones I've seen were reasonably supportive. I think in this case quality is more important than quantity.

I wanted to write something about how unfortunate it is that such a piece gets published in a tabloid... then I've looked up the Daily Mail on Wikipedia and apparently it is the only daily in the UK where there are more women readers (at 53%) than men. So actually it is good that such a piece got published in that paper.
The spreading of information about the [quantum] system through the [classical] environment is ultimately responsible for the emergence of "objective reality." 

Wojciech Hubert Zurek: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical

Captain Courageous

The Daily Mail's Peter Lloyd was recently touted on AM for his articles supporting mens issues. They recently posted an article of his concerning the gender gap where sentencing is concerned.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2338427/This-time-sisterhood-Women-need-angry-rape-liars-like-Linsey-Attridge--shes-abusing-says-Peter-Lloyd.html#ixzz2Vs4KRzDu


Go Up