This case is a major clusterfuck.
Kopin accepted his one year suspension. Then Sclove started to raise hell about her having to go to school while her 'rapist' is on campus, too (due to a year overlap, would have Kopin returned this September). Then on April 26, Klopin made
a statement through his lawyer that he withdraws from Brown permanently and "does not intend to engage in a public debate on this issue". Then -- apparently on May 11 and 22 -- Sclove lodged a complaint with the US Dept. of Education Office of Civil Rights that Brown University violated her Title IX rights with regard to how it conducted the sexual misconduct investigation. That
prompted Kopin's lawyers to send a long letter on June 11 to the same Dept. of Ed. Office of Civil Rights in which they attack Sclove's (often changing) version of events ... basically saying that Scove is full of shit, she's mining public outrage against Kopin and sympathy for herself by aggressively lying about what happened ("misconstrue [the] situation" in Kopin's mom's words) and if Brown U. made a mistake in the sexual misconduct investigation, then it was about failing to provide Kopin with a "truly fair and impartial hearing", which would have concluded -- according to Kopin's lawyers' belief -- that he violated no Brown policies.
Scove self-identifies as a "social justice activist". It seems to me that she's trying to jump-start her career in that field (and possibly score some coinage from Brown) by turning herself into the "poster victim of campus sexual misconduct" (both by a male
and by the school). She even managed to get Sen. Kristen Gillibrand's support -- and the backing of a crusading Senator isn't something to sneeze at.