Is rape that big a deal?

Started by Gabriel, Jun 18, 2004, 11:00 AM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

Sir Jessy of Anti

Quote from: "Mr. Nickle"
Phebe, you have out-contorted yourself this time. You have ducked, dodged and weaved so much you're making people dizzy. You've backed yourself into so many corners with contradictory statements on this thread that you've had to resort to your old "men rape, men make war - that's what they do" trick. You know that one - the one I warned everyone about when you landed here in your trollmobile.

http://www.standyourground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=35699

I'm just surprised it took you this long to use it.


Indeed Phebe, consider this warning one, breaking of the rules - no negative universal sexist generalizations of the opposite sex.
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Pat Kibbon

Quote from: "Phebe"
.

...The fact that you happen to be turned on is what I think you are actually talking about, and that is hardly our fault.

So men get turned on, and some of them decide that's somehow OUR fault...



It's not the sheep's fault that its presence arouses the wolf's predatory nature....

On the other hand, it's not really the wolf's fault either.
"We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paper work is overwhelming."

Pat Kibbon

Quote from: "Phebe"

You may have noticed that the women participants in this discussion (and in almost every discussion of sexual issues) tend to be concerned with avoiding unwanted sexual advances from men and seem to be intimidated by them, while the men tend to be concerned with gaining opportunity to make sexual advances.

Again, why would a woman want to remain vulnerable to emotional damage and intimidated by man's sexual advances when she dosen't have to be?


You are saying we should just give it up willingly and not bother to call it rape. Seems a somewhat simplistic point of view! Disease, pregnancy, being married, being in love with someone else, being grossed out by the rapist, not wanting to be controlled, those all come quickly to mind as reasons not to accept rape.

The reason we feel intimidated is that we may lose. Nothing good about getting taken advantage of in such significant ways.



Phebe, you seem to be the only participant in this discussion standing for a contrary point of view and I admire your courage in doing so.  Your participation prevents this discussion from degenerating into an amen choir.  I also appreciate that the board administrators have allowed this debate.



What I am saying is that I, as a man, have not been socially constructed to experiencee it as "rape' if a woman were to force herself on me sexually.  I would be more likely to enjoy the experience.  In the actual case where the woman attempted to rape me I merely experienced amusement.  Curcumstances  prevented me from enjoying it as a sexual experience.

But, I absolutely never experienced a sence of being, "...Out of control, threatened, contaminated with disease and impregnation, degraded, humiliated, injured, terrified, betrayed, unable to trust the world or life or (wo)men, powerless...."

I do not bear the burden of those feelings.  I have not been socially constructed to do so.



Nor do I bear the burden of the issue women have with 'control of their bodies' where sexuality is concerned...
Quote
...Control over her own body. That's what we're discussing, right? Whether men have a right to use women's bodies for their own pleasure whether we like it or not. If she hints, looks worried, tries to get up, says no but is ignored, etc., etc. it may be "overpersuasion" rather than rape, but she has still lost control of what happens: THAT is why she's mad, of course!...
You could use my body all night if you wanted and the issue of whether or not I had "lost control over my body" would be irrelevant to me.



Those feelings are alien to me in connection with the prospect of a woman raping me because I have not been socially constructed to experience them.



An unspoken assumption of Feminist social construction theory is that since gender characteristics are socially constructed they can therefore be socially re-constructed in whatever way we deem appropriate.  I was curious as to why women would not want to relieve themselves of the burden of feeling...
Quote
...Out of control, threatened, contaminated with disease and impregnation, degraded, humiliated, injured, terrified, betrayed, unable to trust the world or life or men, powerless....
...by applying the simple expedience of social re-construction.  It worked for me.



I am not saying that you should 'not bother to CALL it rape'; I am saying that you need not EXPERIENCE it as rape.  I am not saying that you SHOULD do this, that is your decision.  I was wondering why you would not choose to;  maybe you just never thought of it.




Quote
I had the same experience you did, and threw him off and left. So I won and he lost and I felt good ever since about that. As you did! But you were bigger; I was lucky. It was probably easier for you and chancier for me, so of course women feel anxious. (Though talk about a clear no --- there was no way that guy was getting anything but major, major trouble and injury and loud shrieks in the dorm and trips to the police station if he hadn’t given up when I threw him off. What a total idiot! He just plain wasn’t going to take anything I didn’t want to give. I’d have died first.)


Actually, your did not have the same experience as I.  There were similar events but you experienced them in an entirely different way.




Quote
A man is someone who has the capability to rape; everyone else is a woman.



A very unpleasant...
...but true...
Quote
...slogan. But at least you aren't one of these men who somehow think women can rape. This always seemed ridiculous to me.




You are correct.  Adult women do not rape adult men.  The statement is not only true, it is a defining characteristic that distinguishes men from women.  You could use that statement to explain to an alien how to tell the difference between a man and a woman.
"We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paper work is overwhelming."

Bagu

Women do rape men. Why do you think they can't? Ok legally speaking they can't but it does happen in real life.

Sir Jessy of Anti

Quote
Adult women do not rape adult men. The statement is not only true, it is a defining characteristic that distinguishes men from women. You could use that statement to explain to an alien how to tell the difference between a man and a woman.


When women rape, they tend to do so by taking advantage of those weaker and smaller than them, like children and young adults.  Also they tend to use manipulation more than force.   This is generally why you won't see an adult woman rape a man, though that HAS happened.
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Double Jeopardy

What you said makes perfect sense, Jessy, women take advantage of weaker subjects, children and they do rape men. This is such a slippery slope that a very large majority of women seem to quickly dismiss just as Phebe has. They minimize the wrong doings of women who rape and always slide the tables of blame and damnation over to men as the foundation of all that entails rape, molestation and overpowering another persons will. I call that femisms love child, indoctrination with a punch that huts everyone, only feminists care very little because even when it hurts women when the backlash comes, they make sure their higher ground of moral entitlement has a solid foundation. Look at the laws, the sociological damage this mindset has done to our society, women looking for harsher sentencing for rape than other tragic offenses which hurt society just as bad. It makes me ill when I think about it.

Renegade

Quote
It's not the sheep's fault that its presence arouses the wolf's predatory nature....

On the other hand, it's not really the wolf's fault either.


This is something that I would like to expand upon to help shed some light. When a woman wants a baby, it is seen as that: she wants to produce offspring, or her "biological clock is ticking". When a man wants to copulate, it is seen as "having sex", something which he is doing strictly for enjoyment, like going to a theme park or going to a movie. Even when society *does* acknowledge that male sexual behaviour can be or *is* biological or instinctually driven, when a male actually acts on it, BAM! it is viewed completely as his free-willed decision completely based on his desires as a "person".

Picture this. You have an apple on your head and someone is going to fire an arrow from a bow and try to peg the apple. You are new to this and whenever the bow is drawn, you instinctively flinch. The person is getting annoyed, but you cant help it; your body is reacting instinctively. That is what is happening with human males. Males are *biologically* programmed to feel aroused or stimulated when certain stimuli presents itself.

*Yet* society views this as being strictly free-willed decision-making on the males part: they are blamed completely for being  a"predatory wolf" and therefore society does *nothing* to educate men about "restraining" their urges in order to avoid getting manipulated. Instead society *enforces* mens sexual urges and exploits it. Society continually informs males that "sex" with a woman is the greatest thing in the world and they should seek it out regsardless of consequences. When a situation goes bad, the male is reprimanded and scolded.

Thats my observation.

R
"A man chooses. A slave obeys." What if a man 'chooses' to obey, because he is met with scorn, shame and ridicule and rendered a social outcasts if he does not?

Phebe

Anyway, nice trolling. You even got me to do my first post!

I'm not trolling, oldfellow. But that was an interesting post and I wish you would do more!  :)

Pheeb - do you really think that the world is a nasty brutal place because of the violent and competitive nature of males OR is the violent and competitive nature of males the result of the world being a nasty brutal place? If women were in charge, would we all just share??

The former, and yes.

I like the 80/20 rule: women who dress provocatively are trying to attract the attention of a small group (20%) of the men they encounter.

Nice. I like it too.

Phebe

An unspoken assumption of Feminist social construction theory is that since gender characteristics are socially constructed they can therefore be socially re-constructed in whatever way we deem appropriate. ...

I am not saying that you should 'not bother to CALL it rape'; I am saying that you need not EXPERIENCE it as rape. I am not saying that you SHOULD do this, that is your decision. I was wondering why you would not choose to; maybe you just never thought of it.


A true intellectual. Very impressive argument.  :)


It's not the sheep's fault that its presence arouses the wolf's predatory nature....

On the other hand, it's not really the wolf's fault either.


Pat: yes, I agree that's the bottom line. We are arguing about nonoptional conditions, at least to some extent.

Sir Jessy of Anti

Quote from: "Double Jeopardy"
What you said makes perfect sense, Jessy, women take advantage of weaker subjects, children and they do rape men. This is such a slippery slope that a very large majority of women seem to quickly dismiss just as Phebe has.


It also makes sense from a feminist perspective.   If rape is a crime of 'power and violence'  (hint: not sex) as they claim, then it would follow that the pecking order goes from the most physically powerful to the most vulnerable.
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Gabriel

Quote from: "Renegade"

*Yet* society views this as being strictly free-willed decision-making on the males part: they are blamed completely for being  a"predatory wolf" and therefore society does *nothing* to educate men about "restraining" their urges in order to avoid getting manipulated. Instead society *enforces* mens sexual urges and exploits it. Society continually informs males that "sex" with a woman is the greatest thing in the world and they should seek it out regsardless of consequences. When a situation goes bad, the male is reprimanded and scolded.


Good observation, I would like to elaborate. Men's respond to stimuli, so women dress in sexual manners to trigger that sexual response (or casually slip sexuality into conversations), it has been observed that when a man has been sexually aroused, even slightly, he is less rational and makes poor decisions, this can be overcome to a point. This is what marketing executives take advantage of.
There is a reason why females dress a certain way, they are trying to stimulate the male sexual response.
To deal with the rape issue, people should be holding females responsible for:
a. putting themselves in bad situations
b. triggering the male sexual response.

Females wish to be able to tease men at their whim, turning men on and then not following through. They get annoyed when some men respond to their dress, but not others. Men should have psychic powers to be able to discern who the female wishes to talk with.

Although males should be held responsible for a rape, the culture should not be encouraging females to tease men, dress in provocatively, and putting women in stupid situations.
Nor should it be convicting men of rape if a women does not make her desire not to have sex clear to the man. In face, the prosecutors in the Kobe Bryant case are trying to make the claim that whether or not the women consented is irrelevant:

Quote
The issue of consent has emerged as a key battleground between attorneys in the case. The defense wants jurors told they can convict the Los Angeles Lakers star only if prosecutors prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she did not consent to sex -- and that Bryant knew it.

"The jury has to be told that if someone consents, that's not submission against her will," argued defense attorney Hal Haddon, who said it is the first time a Colorado judge has had to consider the issue.

Prosecutors said they are required to prove only that Bryant's actions were enough to cause the woman to submit to sex against her will, making the consent question moot.

"By proving the elements (of sexual assault), you necessarily disprove consent," said Matt Holman, an assistant state attorney general helping with the case.

Scott Robinson, a Denver defense attorney who is following the case, said prosecutors were taking an "extreme position" in suggesting her consent does not matter. "It seems anathema to our traditional view of what constitutes rape," he said.


http://www.usatoday.com/sports/basketball/nba/2004-06-22-kobe-bryant-case_x.htm?POE=SPOISVA&POE=click-refer

kind of a messy post, but I'm too busy to clean it up currently.

Pat Kibbon

Quote from: "Phebe"

A true intellectual. Very impressive argument.  :)


Thank-you, Phebe.
"We can lick gravity, but sometimes the paper work is overwhelming."

InternetDevil

Quote from: "Phebe"
Pheeb - do you really think that the world is a nasty brutal place because of the violent and competitive nature of males OR is the violent and competitive nature of males the result of the world being a nasty brutal place? If women were in charge, would we all just share??

The former, and yes.


That is where we disagree 100%.  How come are victims of child abuse, Vietnam vets and others who suffered alot have crime rates 30 times greater then those nonabused, while men have rates only 6 times higher then women?  As of 1860 in UK, women committed 60% of murder.

Given your level of sophistication on social issues, I would be surprised if you do not know criminology.

Renegade

Quote
do you really think that the world is a nasty brutal place because of the violent and competitive nature of males


Well, considering that no one gets to *choose* being male or female and IF violence and competitiveness is part of being male, then they are still not at fault, even if this is the case. A man did not *choose* to be a man, so the violent/competitive aspect was forced upon him without any say so.

R
"A man chooses. A slave obeys." What if a man 'chooses' to obey, because he is met with scorn, shame and ridicule and rendered a social outcasts if he does not?

Sir Jessy of Anti

I'm wondering if women do often socialize and expect men to be competitive and agressive, as these qualities seem to benefit women as much as men?
"The man who speaks to you of sacrifice, speaks of slaves and masters. And intends to be the master." -- Ayn Rand<br /><br />

Go Up