Raped During a Porn Shoot? Now I've Heard it All...

Started by SouthernGuy, Aug 10, 2004, 05:30 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

SouthernGuy

http://www.adultfyi.com/read.aspx?ID=5172

"Corina Taylor Says She Was Anally Raped

...that's why she left the business

Taylor aid she was told the scene was going to be a vaginal cream pie. Taylor said during the course of the scene the male talent started sticking his fingers up her ass. "I didn't say anything," she said. "Then he started slipping the head of his dick in. I was like, no, I don't do anal. Then they stopped and started the camera."

Taylor said the final posiion in the scene was the spoon position. She and the male talent were on a couch. "Then he stuck the entire head and half his dick in my ass again," Taylor goes on to say. "The camera got stopped again. I gave ten different excuses why I didn't want to do anal. There were other guys on the set and they were going, well, the cock's already in your ass. Finally I just took it.

"She's really cute, but for as many scenes that I've done I should have have that boxcover and it should have said Corina Taylor's first anal," Taylor continues. "I was laying there getting raped up my ass, literally. I told them no but finally took it because they weren't going to quit.

So she's fukking some guy in a porn and he talks her into anal, which she isn't sure about according to her. Not only is this little cum guzzling attention whore now saying she was raped, she's pissed she didn't get the cover for the porn and the word's  "Corina Taylor's first anal".

Talk about somebody WANTING to be a victim. I have now seen it all gentlemen, what some women will do for sympathy is amazing...

SG

Assault

Wow....her parents and friends must be so proud.

I can't believe the victim mentalityof our culture sometimes. Take some *&$%^ responsibility for yourselves people. :x
Feminism is the product of female selfishness, compounded by male chivalry.

- Peter Zohrab -

mr niceguy

Still --- if she wants to draw the line at anal she should be allowed to do so. Otherwise it IS rape. It's scumbags like the male talent she's describing that have tarnished porn's once-lofty reputation. Who wants to watch a porn scene where the actress is miserable and in pain anyway?

Stallywood

Quote from: "mr niceguy"
Still --- if she wants to draw the line at anal she should be allowed to do so. Otherwise it IS rape. It's scumbags like the male talent she's describing that have tarnished porn's once-lofty reputation. Who wants to watch a porn scene where the actress is miserable and in pain anyway?


I have to agree with this view.
Stally
Gentleman is a man who consciously serves women. I prefer the golden rule.

Behind every great man, is a
parasite.

Women who say men won't commit, usually aren't worth committing to.

dr e

I suppose they will have plenty of evidence to bring to court.   :yes:

It's all on tape.
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

mr niceguy

Quote from: "Dr Evil"
I suppose they will have plenty of evidence to bring to court.   :yes:

It's all on tape.
Not according to her, if they stopped the camera every time she started to voice her objections. Besides, I'd guess that anything that could remotely help her case was already edited out and maybe even destroyed.

dr e

I doubt it would take much of an expert to take a look at the raw footage that was shot and get some ideas about the nature of that encounter.  

I'd be curious to hear where you see her responsibility in this Mr Niceguy?
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

Quasimodo

Quote
There were other guys on the set and they were going, well, the cock's already in your ass. Finally I just took it.

Sorry, but this sounds like they used persuasion more than physical force or intimidation. She could have always flatly refused -- even if it meant not getting paid, although there's no indication that this was the case. This sounds a lot like the old fem definition of rape being giving in to sex when you'd rather not.
axine Waters on the 2004 March for Women:
"I have to march because my mother could not have an abortion." ! ! !

mr niceguy

Dr. Evil, I'm inferring that if the cameras were turned off, there might not be any raw footage of the crucial moments. Also I'm guessing that if any of the cameras were on, it would then be a simple matter to destroy the evidence before any authorities could seize it.

Not knowing anything about this performer other than what's posted above, I'd say her responsibilities include reading and understanding her contract; not signing anything that prevents her from negotiating or setting limits; being clear about setting those limits; and of course being willing to walk away from the industry if she's unable to deal with the emotional wreckage that often goes hand-in-hand with trading one's sexuality for money.

My reading of this situation is that she was "persuaded" to give in to the anal invasion the same way a falsely accused person might be "persuaded" to give a confession, if they're outnumbered and feel alone, their wishes are not being respected or even heard, and they are tired of fighting and just want their current predicament to end, albeit temporarily. The pressure to "go along" can be overwhelming in certain situations in life, for either gender.

I can also see why she, having lost the battle during the shoot, might want to think of ways to win the larger war, such as suing, getting her typical porn-star recognition on the box cover, or whatever else.

I think it's worth asking why all the men in the room persisted with the anal sex even though she had made it clear that she didn't do anal.

neoteny

Quote from: "mr niceguy"
[...] The pressure to "go along" can be overwhelming in certain situations in life, for either gender. [...]


So true, and that is why we assume that an adult who is in full control of his/her mental and physical faculties is employing his/her free will when him/her agrees to something while not being under a direct physical threat (ie. no gun held to head, neither the threat of a loved one being hurt).

As Kate Fillion has pithily said: "Unwanted sex isn't rape; unavoidable sex is."
The spreading of information about the [quantum] system through the [classical] environment is ultimately responsible for the emergence of "objective reality." 

Wojciech Hubert Zurek: Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical

mr niceguy

Quote from: "neoteny"
...that is why we assume that an adult who is in full control of his/her mental and physical faculties is employing his/her free will when him/her agrees to something while not being under a direct physical threat (ie. no gun held to head, neither the threat of a loved one being hurt).

As Kate Fillion has pithily said: "Unwanted sex isn't rape; unavoidable sex is."
I consider the standard for rape to be the utterance of the word "No" --- which she says happened in this case --- not necessarily the threat of death. In her words, the threat was that "they weren't going to quit". That seems like a logical conclusion if indeed she had already given them 10 different reasons why she wouldn't do anal; I'd imagine that they were all good reasons --- I'd probably have 100 reasons for not wanting someone's dick up my ass. Their contention that "well, the cock's already in your ass" seems odd, as if the cock had just stumbled into her ass by accident and couldn't be dislodged.

I guess we could all call her a heroine if she had jumped up with her little fists flying against all those men, and then run out of the room screaming, never to return to the room or the industry again. Bear in mind, though, that this is the bizarro world where sex equals work, and in a workplace there is an obligation on the part of management to provide safe conditions for employees, not an obligation on the part of employees to fight off assaults by fellow employees.

dr e

So saying no is the default?  How about if this porn star had approached a male actor during the shoot and had mounted him and he said "No I  don't want you to do this."  They continue their endeavors to a conclusion.  The next day he charges her with rape.  Would you agree with this charge that she is guilty of rape?  If yes, should she be sentenced in a similar manner to other rapists?
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

mr niceguy

Quote from: "Quasimodo"
She could have always flatly refused -- even if it meant not getting paid, although there's no indication that this was the case.
I finally got around to reading the entire link, and I see her claim that complaining afterwards has led to punitive actions being taken against her, including not getting paid for her work that day --- even though she did in fact finish the scene.

I also see that she had planned to do anal sex scenes in the future, but had not done any yet and was not prepared to do so at that time --- which of course is her perogative.

mr niceguy

Quote from: "Dr Evil"
So saying no is the default?  How about if this porn star had approached a male actor during the shoot and had mounted him and he said "No I  don't want you to do this."  They continue their endeavors to a conclusion.  The next day he charges her with rape.  Would you agree with this charge that she is guilty of rape?  If yes, should she be sentenced in a similar manner to other rapists?
Yes, yes, and yes. Why? Is he saying that's what she did?... Or are you introducing a straw man argument?

dr e

I am trying to understand just how and what you believe.  It's hard to imagine how you could think she should be sentenced in a similar manner to other rapists.  That is like saying that a guy doing 65 in a 55 mph zone should have the same fine as someone going 120.  Two completely different circumstances which deserve different approaches.

If one goes along with this idea that "no" is enough to charge rape I think there are numerous problems.  It seems tailor made to fit in with the "powerless women as victims" theme that contradicts the "women can better anything a man can do" themes.  

Let's take another hypothetical.  A group of young men are angry at another young man.  The group plots to beat the crap out of the guy.  One of the group in the planning session says to them that he doesn't think this is a good idea and he is not going to participate.  He says "no" to the plan.   They give him a rash of crap and strongarm him to go along with the group.  He conceeds.  They go to beat up the guy and end up killing him.  When it goes to court this man tells the judge that he had said "no" to this but was strongarmed into going along with them.  Should he be convicted like the rest or should he be given special treatment?
Contact dr e  Lifeboats for the ladies and children, icy waters for the men.  Women have rights and men have responsibilties.

Go Up