Can you find the rape? I can't.

[Mr. Nickle]

You guys are not going to believe this one.
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1097949382383_48?hub=Canada

Vancouver police search for sex assault con man
CTV.ca News Staff
Vancouver police say it's one of the most bizarre scams they've ever heard of. They're looking for a man who convinces women to re-enact sex crimes for him.
The man, reportedly a smooth talker, tells the women he's involved in a major police investigation into sexual assaults and he says he needs the women to help him solve the case.
"What he does is befriend these women, says he needs them to re-enact the crime so he could figure out how they're going to go about solving it," said Vancouver Police's Sarah Bloor.
At least four women have been raped so far, but police say there could me more. The man's victims say he gained their trust through his charming personality. They also say he was handsome and well-dressed.
The man arranges to meet the women at a downtown hotel through a mutual acquaintance and stages a re-enactment for the women to participate in.
He reportedly tells his victims that if they give convincing performances, they could be offered lucrative careers with the man's international security company.
Police say some of the victims agreed to take part in the re-enactments out of a sense of "civic duty."
Vancouver investigators believe they know who the man is, but they need a little more information before they can lay any charges.

So he lies to these women who willingly meet him and have sex with him but when they find out he's lying it's suddenly rape? WTF? Better build more prisons.

The police aren't laying charges because this guy didn't rape anybody. The only thing he's guilty of is being handsome, charming and a smooth-talker.

I can just imagine the look on the officer's face.

"I want to report a rape."
"Did he have a weapon?"
"No"
"Did he threaten you in any way?"
"No"
"You had sex with him willingly?"
"Yes, but then I found out he lied to me"
"Ummm. That ain't rape - that's you being a stupid bitch."

What really pisses me off is that they refer to him as a rapist in this article. If I were him I'd be talking to a lawyer about a hefty lawsuit againt these shitheads.

[typhonblue]

Hehe... what a great, bizzare line.

BTW, no one agrees to sex out of "civic duty": these ladies wanted to get laid, but they also don't want the shame of wanting to get laid.

At some point the powers that be have to realize they can't protect women from their own stupidity. And that getting schlepped by a handsome guy is a reward in and of itself.

[neonsamurai]

What!?!?! :shock:

You mean lying to women and sleeping with them is a crime?!?!? Oh man oh man oh man. Am I in trouble now?!?!?!

Lady: "...So you own a Fortune 500 company?"

Neonsamurai: "Well two actually. I just don't know where I have the time for them though really, what with all the work I do helping orphans."

Lady: "You help orphans too?"

Neonsamurai: "And blind children. I often take them for cruises on my yacht. Poor kids. I spend so much time helping them have a better life, and running those three global corporations, that I feel so lonely and unloved."

Lady: "Oh you poor thing!"

Neonsamurai: "Maybe you and I could snuggle up together and I could tell you all about it over a glass of champagne."

Lady: "That's an extra £20. If you want penetrative sex as well that's £60."

Neonsamurai: "Erm... Will you take a cheque?"

[FP]

Hehe... what a great, bizzare line.

BTW, no one agrees to sex out of "civic duty": these ladies wanted to get laid, but they also don't want the shame of wanting to get laid.

At some point the powers that be have to realize they can't protect women from their own stupidity. And that getting schlepped by a handsome guy is a reward in and of itself.

I know, "civic duty" ?? Wait, lemme guess because theres the "war on terror" going on, its her civic duty to help out any good looking snake charmer in a uniform?

At best they could maybe get the guy on some hopped up sexual assault charge but no way is it rape. The only thing I could convict him of besides being an asshat is impersonating a police officer if he outright said he was a policeman.

[nyet]

Unless he lied about being a cop, lying ain't illegal. Neither is lyin to someone to get in their pants.

[Assault]

Well that's Canada for you. We are treated like children more and more each day by our officials. Women should find this attitude insulting, but for some reason many don't seem to. I would be insulted if my gender were treated like they couldn't be trusted to make intelligent decisions.

Even our courts have gotten into the act. I've read cases where judges ordered men to say only nice things about thier ex-wives!  :roll:

[Galt]

Feminists play both sides against the middle.  If it works in their favor, they will turn a blind eye to being treated like a child - as long as they're the victim - but try to deny them something by saying the same thing.  You'll be treated to vicious snapping, snarling and maybe foam-mouthed biting until you quit.

That's the whole thing with feminism - they are simultaneously ultimate and perpetual victims of the patriarchy and men, but on the other hand they are superior to men, they can do anything men can do but a lot better.  Hear me roar and all that stuff.

It only works because of the big mass of chivalristic men.  In both directions.

[Galt]

Women should certainly have equal opportunities - so now it's time that they get equal responsibilities.  Like the responsbility that they bear the consequences of their decisions without the protection that is not offered to men, for starters.  That's not going to go over quite as well with the NOW crowd.

[D]

Feminists play both sides against the middle.  If it works in their favor, they will turn a blind eye to being treated like a child - as long as they're the victim - but try to deny them something by saying the same thing.  You'll be treated to vicious snapping, snarling and maybe foam-mouthed biting until you quit.

That's the whole thing with feminism - they are simultaneously ultimate and perpetual victims of the patriarchy and men, but on the other hand they are superior to men, they can do anything men can do but a lot better.  Hear me roar and all that stuff.

It only works because of the big mass of chivalristic men.  In both directions.

Why do you think women weren't allowd to get loans in the first place.  They play it both ways, it's been this way since the dawn of time and that's why things are the way it is.

I'm sorry , Evil if that's a generalization, but it seems very inherently true.

Not all women are like this of course, but rarely do they get the voice.  

When someone offers you a scapegoat every single time,  "you're a helpless woman" people will take it.

Unlike men who have to take it like a man.

[D]

Well that's Canada for you. We are treated like children more and more each day by our officials. Women should find this attitude insulting, but for some reason many don't seem to. I would be insulted if my gender were treated like they couldn't be trusted to make intelligent decisions.

Even our courts have gotten into the act. I've read cases where judges ordered men to say only nice things about thier ex-wives!  :roll:

Not to pry into your personal life, but I would like to ask you a question

Knowing that you are a guard do you deal with men shoved in jail for the typical feminist BS often?  And if so, do you sympathize with those guys behind bars knowing first hand that so much of it is bullshit?

Don't feel as though you have to answer the open forum,  but if there's no problem with it, I'd like to know your perspective on it.

[Galt]

<<Why do you think women weren't allowd to get loans in the first place. They play it both ways, it's been this way since the dawn of time and that's why things are the way it is.>>

That's actually a big kick with feminists these days - the old married women's laws.  The other way of looking at it is that men were completely and fully responsible for all debts of the wife.  She was responsible for diddly squat.  So in that situation, why shouldn't they have had a law that the husband had to know about loans or contract obligations (i.e. co-sign)?

But they've twisted that far further today into "women couldn't own property" - which is complete and utter BS.  That is a mischaracterization of the laws regarding married women entering into loans and contracts (which the husband was fully responsible for in the old days).  Feminists are great at mischaracterization and dissemination.  Women have owned property under English common law (i.e. England, Canada, US etc.) since the Domesday book (women are listed as property owners) almost a thousand years ago.  I guess before that, you owned the property if you were bigger or had more guys behind you than the current guy on the property.

[FP]

Well that's Canada for you. We are treated like children more and more each day by our officials. Women should find this attitude insulting, but for some reason many don't seem to. I would be insulted if my gender were treated like they couldn't be trusted to make intelligent decisions.

Even our courts have gotten into the act. I've read cases where judges ordered men to say only nice things about thier ex-wives!  :roll:

"Say something nice about your ex or I'll hold you in contempt!"

"Okay. You honor, my wife gave good head. Something her new lover attested to on the porno they made on our wedding bed. She could try out for Penthouse Pet of the Year videos."

[Assault]

Well that's Canada for you. We are treated like children more and more each day by our officials. Women should find this attitude insulting, but for some reason many don't seem to. I would be insulted if my gender were treated like they couldn't be trusted to make intelligent decisions.

Even our courts have gotten into the act. I've read cases where judges ordered men to say only nice things about thier ex-wives!  :roll:

"Say something nice about your ex or I'll hold you in contempt!"

"Okay. You honor, my wife gave good head. Something her new lover attested to on the porno they made on our wedding bed. She could try out for Penthouse Pet of the Year videos."

LMAO!!! This sounds suspiciously close to MY divorce experience in the family court!!! :lol:

[Assault]

Not to pry into your personal life, but I would like to ask you a question

Knowing that you are a guard do you deal with men shoved in jail for the typical feminist BS often?  And if so, do you sympathize with those guys behind bars knowing first hand that so much of it is bullshit?

Don't feel as though you have to answer the open forum,  but if there's no problem with it, I'd like to know your perspective on it.

Pry away...I don't care.

I'm a Federal Correctional officer, therefore the inmates I see are in for serious crimes such as murder, rape, etc. So, what I'm saying is that chances are these guys are guilty as sin and deserve to be there. On the other hand there are definate cases where a women was involved in some way and recieved a totally different outcome due to her gender.

The one that comes to mind is Paul Bernardo and Karla Holmoka. They were killing and raping teenage girls and commiting the most atrocious acts of torture and degredation on these girls.

Bernardo was given the full punishment under our laws, but Karla played the victim card and was given a few years in prison. She can be seen on videotapes helping Bernardo kill/rape thier victims. One of those victims was her own freaking SISTER! :shock:

I read a book about Holmolka and you can see the difference in the way both were treated....even in the media. There were parts where the feminist psychologist was coaching Holmoka and telling her what to say to be prtrayed as a victim. It was disgusting.

A person who could better answer your original question would be my friend who works in the Provincial jail as an officer. He sees "average joe's" come in for less serious crimes. I've talked to him about this before and his concensus was that yes, he did hear alot of stories about men's lives being destroyed by a vengfull woman.

[LSBeene]

Unless the guy TOLD the women he was a cop, then he's just some asswipe.

But don't tell me he got 4 completely different women to f*ck him, and that he should go to jail.

Does that mean that dominatrix's should go to jail?  Think it through: the guy asked and maybe paid for it, but it was degrading, maybe a rape act, and painful ....

No way he should be in jail, but had he done this to a woman I know he'd definately deserve some male on male "wall to wall counseling".

Steven