qoute; "Dan Lynch
You are implying more tribalism not a dissent from any innate virtue. An Us against Them zero sum. The battle of the sexes rages on.
This battle was designed by elites in places to sit back and watch the whole dumb show. Even if men win, they lose. Even if women win, they lose. Don't you see that by now?"
You still don't get that the strategy isn't a final goal. It is just a tool to break the ranks of feminists and instill masculinity in men!
Forget the Elite-Conspiracy thing. If you stop the problems the Elite supposedly creates - you stop them -
if there is a conspiracy!
Chivalry has always been a cheap shot if you are not in a superior position where you can grant the privilege. Outside that, chivalry is the 'cheap whimps' way of advancing his genes, no matter the cost for everyone else. It is probably also a 'legal way' of advancing genes in a jungle environment with a chimpansee-like lifestyle. BUT it isn't so in a civilization created by men.
Men upholding the values of an orderly society and preserving their male values shall not have to bear being attacked insidiously by cheap shots. Before socialism/feminism/political correctness that wasn't a real problem because that kind of chivalrous males weren't valued by women, they knew the difference from help and courtesy coming from real men.
Besides that, real men could then deal with 'chivalry' on the spot when exposed to it.
Without being an independant male with a proper selfesteem that kind of chivalry is simple subjugation and metrosexuality.
Stay tuned to the internet, and you will get the rest of story!