Yay! More laws changed to appease women

[Renegade]

Airports To Modify Patdowns On Women
Airport Screeners Will No Longer Touch Females Between The Breasts

POSTED: 9:36 pm EST December 22, 2004
UPDATED: 11:29 pm EST December 22, 2004

WASHINGTON -- Just in time for the Christmas holiday travel rush, the government has modified patdown search procedures for female passengers.

Effective Thursday, airport security screeners can no longer touch female passengers between their breasts. Screeners are to pat down the perimeter of the chest, backsides and abdomen of women unless detection equipment picks up the possibility that they're hiding explosives.

The new rules are in response to numerous complaints from women about the intrusiveness of the searches.

"This reduces some of the anxiety that some passengers have expressed," Transportation Security Administration spokesman Mark Hatfield told the Associated Press, adding that the change does not weaken security efforts.


Roughly 2 million passengers a week are patted down. Some are searched this way after setting off metal detectors twice; others are chosen by computer.

The government directed airport screeners to carry out more frequent, more thorough searches for explosives. That policy was instituted Sept. 22, after 90 people were killed in two plane crashes in Russia believed to have been caused by Chechen women who carried explosives on board.

Original Link:
http://www.channelcincinnati.com/travelgetaways/4019333/detail.html


Does this mean that, as a man, I can tell them no "patting" in my groin area because it is "intrusive"? Of course not. I am a male! I have all the power and freedom in the world...to do exactly what society tells me to do and not complain about it......

caused by Chechen women who carried explosives on board.

So, even when they have *reason* to search women thorougly, the female privelege gets its way again.  :roll:

[daksdaddy]

I saw this on the news last night. :shock:

It really struck me.

With all the news recently, regarding women and violence you'd think it would be quite the opposite. But i digress "Dan Lynch's" theories become more convincing all the time (re: elite's), if the pilots quarters were fortified, and everyone was allowed to carry personal protection, would "terrorism" continue to be a factor? I doubt it. The more we are subjected to security by the government, the more we lose in personal freedom's. It's a fact. Are we really be protected? Nope. We are being indoctrinated into fear and helplessness. This really has to stop, and soon.

[dr e]

Um, note to terrorists:

If you want to hide some C4 or something akin to that just bring your GF with >38D and slap that stuff tween the cracks and you are gauranteed entry into US airlines.  

How stupid can we get?

[daksdaddy]

How stupid can we get?

It would seem that even with current computational power and speed, that question can't be answered within the next 67 years. :lol:

In other words, it seems immeasurable.

[Stallywood]

I was following this for the last couple of weeks.(On the Dan Abrams show on Fox) I saw the first show where the TSA guy stood up against an idiot woman to defend the patdowns. I was hoping theTSA would not fold, but they did. So it seems a womans complaints are worse than the threat of sucide bombers.
Stally

[daksdaddy]

I was hoping theTSA would not fold, but they did. So it seems a womans complaints are worse than the threat of sucide bombers.

Why do you suppose suicide bombers exist? What are they opposed to, You and Me? Nope. They are doing it for freedom from oppression.
I don't agree with the tactic, but that doesn't make the facts any less severe.
Taken in context with "Dan Lynch's" theory's and conclusions. This type off oppression will only increase the likelyhood and frequency of "suicide bomber" and terrorist type actions.

Take a good look. "Big Brother" is watching. That my friends is the problem.

[The Gonzman]

I've got an idea.

We'll have all female flights for those women who object to being searched.  Female pilots, flight attendents, and passengers.  No, no man will fondle your boobs to see if that fake one is really a wad of C4.

But neither will they frisk your fellow traveller's boobs

No Cell phones (jammed) and a double locked door into the flight cabin to prevent hijacking.

So when your seatmate whips that explosive out of her bra, and sets it off, or decompresses the cabin by firing the zip gun she secreted in her feminine orifice, only such women will die.

Sounds good to me.

[D]

Amazing how a little bit of bitching goes a long way.  Looks like men will be immobalized while women can travel freely.  

Interesting.   And a police state at that.

[Asian Lover]

This new policy will last until another plane goes down.

[Sir Jessy of Anti]

How stupid can we get?

It would seem that even with current computational power and speed, that question can't be answered within the next 67 years. :lol:

In other words, it seems immeasurable.

42

[The Gonzman]

How stupid can we get?

Please don't even ask that question.  You know it will be answered.  And nobody is going to like the answer.

[Stallywood]

BTW, as I understood it, the women were being searched by women and men by men, unless the same sex TSA employee wasnt available. So this is just a case of women bitching to bitch.
Stally

[LST]

I beg to disagree !
Somehow it has become accepted that if someone of the same sex touches you or looks at you naked then it "doesn't count".

?_?

And for the boob-searching thing, of course no one bothered to pass the same rule for men. Because you are just a stupid male and you don't deserve privacy, it's just a filthy disgusting penis.
The same logic that makes it possible for female reporters to be allowed into male locker rooms.

[Stallywood]

I beg to disagree !
Somehow it has become accepted that if someone of the same sex touches you or looks at you naked then it "doesn't count".

?_?

And for the boob-searching thing, of course no one bothered to pass the same rule for men. Because you are just a stupid male and you don't deserve privacy, it's just a filthy disgusting penis.
The same logic that makes it possible for female reporters to be allowed into male locker rooms.

While I still believe women just want to bitch, I also believe you are correct. So my point 20% and yours 80%.  

Stally